PFD report

Ahshiyah Bibi · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Apr 2017•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to act on identified missing blood gas results
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
  2. Lack of Trust-wide review and risk-control development for insulin prescribing errors
  3. Failure of nursing staff to check dispensed insulin doses
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to verify medication and dose before dispensing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to act on identified missing blood gas results

Wider context from the report

“3. ████████ evidence was that although he has investigated the insulin prescribing error and it has been discussed with the individuals involved there has not been a Trust wide review of the risks of this occurring again and consideration of a system to reduce the risk of error. The problem of missing blood gas results was identified by ████████ but not considered for further action within the department or across the Trust. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of Trust-wide review and risk-control development for insulin prescribing errors

Wider context from the report

“3. ████████ evidence was that although he has investigated the insulin prescribing error and it has been discussed with the individuals involved there has not been a Trust wide review of the risks of this occurring again and consideration of a system to reduce the risk of error. The problem of missing blood gas results was identified by ████████ but not considered for further action within the department or across the Trust. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of nursing staff to check dispensed insulin doses

Wider context from the report

“2. At 04:00 a drug error was made in the prescribing and dispensing of Actrapid insulin for hyperkalaemia: Mrs. Bibi was prescribed a 50 unit dose instead of a 10 unit dose, the error was identified when she had received 20 units and the infusion was stopped. The evidence of ████████ who prescribed the insulin was she knew the Trust’s protocol and standard treatment to be a dose of 10 units but made a mistake. It appears from investigations carried out by ████████ that the two members of the nursing staff who dispensed the dose did not check the dose. Professor Hanif, Consultant in Diabetes, gave independent expert evidence that in his view there is a risk of inappropriate prescribing of insulin in the management of hyperkalaemia because clinicians are more commonly called upon to prescribed a 50 unit does for Hyperglycaemia. Therefore in his opinion a system is required to avoid error in cases of hyperkalaemia. ████████ agreed that the fact she more commonly prescribes a 50 unit dose of insulin for hyperglycaemia probably did explain her error. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to verify medication and dose before dispensing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure arterial blood gas results remain available to clinicians

Wider context from the report

“1. When reviewing Mrs. Bibi at 02:14 ████████ did not have the results from an arterial blood gas performed by the nursing team at 01:52 which demonstrated high potassium therefore treatment for high potassium was not commenced until approximately 04:00 when the high potassium had been identified. It was the evidence of ████████ and ████████ that from time to time the hard copy blood gas results do get separated from the records and if the Clinician doesn’t know the test has been undertaken they will have no reason to go and source the results. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon; Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prevent inappropriate insulin prescribing for hyperkalaemia

Wider context from the report

“2. At 04:00 a drug error was made in the prescribing and dispensing of Actrapid insulin for hyperkalaemia: Mrs. Bibi was prescribed a 50 unit dose instead of a 10 unit dose, the error was identified when she had received 20 units and the infusion was stopped. The evidence of ████████ who prescribed the insulin was she knew the Trust’s protocol and standard treatment to be a dose of 10 units but made a mistake. It appears from investigations carried out by ████████ that the two members of the nursing staff who dispensed the dose did not check the dose. Professor Hanif, Consultant in Diabetes, gave independent expert evidence that in his view there is a risk of inappropriate prescribing of insulin in the management of hyperkalaemia because clinicians are more commonly called upon to prescribed a 50 unit does for Hyperglycaemia. Therefore in his opinion a system is required to avoid error in cases of hyperkalaemia. ████████ agreed that the fact she more commonly prescribes a 50 unit dose of insulin for hyperglycaemia probably did explain her error. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.