PFD report

Jane Lesley Bruce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Oct 2021•Leicester City and South Leicestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to take wound photographs for continuity and reference
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate district nursing wound care
  2. Lack of continuity in community nursing staff assessing wounds
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide continuity of care staffingPart of recurring concern: Failure to provide continuity of patient care
  3. Unavailability of electronic records to District Nurses during home visits
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to take wound photographs for continuity and reference

Wider context from the report

“Ms Bruce was care for in the community by several different District Nurses. This meant that it was not the same nurse who was always seeing the wound. No photographs were taken for continuity / reference to and the electronic records could not be accessed by the District Nurses while they were in Ms Bruce’s home. This meant that all information that could have been available was not. This meant that Ms Bruce’s change in condition was not fully appreciated. Leicestershire Partnership Trust have learned from this and District Nurse now have work mobile phones so that they can take photographic evidence of wounds as well as IT technology that means they can access the electronic records while they are with the patient. In addition, they also have a ‘sepsis’ bag containing equipment to record the blood pressure, oxygen saturation levels and temperature. Although this lesson has been learned and changes made to prevent future deaths locally, the concern is that the practice that was in place at the time of Ms Bruce’s death may be practice elsewhere. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate district nursing wound care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of continuity in community nursing staff assessing wounds

Wider context from the report

“Ms Bruce was care for in the community by several different District Nurses. This meant that it was not the same nurse who was always seeing the wound. No photographs were taken for continuity / reference to and the electronic records could not be accessed by the District Nurses while they were in Ms Bruce’s home. This meant that all information that could have been available was not. This meant that Ms Bruce’s change in condition was not fully appreciated. Leicestershire Partnership Trust have learned from this and District Nurse now have work mobile phones so that they can take photographic evidence of wounds as well as IT technology that means they can access the electronic records while they are with the patient. In addition, they also have a ‘sepsis’ bag containing equipment to record the blood pressure, oxygen saturation levels and temperature. Although this lesson has been learned and changes made to prevent future deaths locally, the concern is that the practice that was in place at the time of Ms Bruce’s death may be practice elsewhere. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide continuity of care staffing; Failure to provide continuity of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of electronic records to District Nurses during home visits

Wider context from the report

“Ms Bruce was care for in the community by several different District Nurses. This meant that it was not the same nurse who was always seeing the wound. No photographs were taken for continuity / reference to and the electronic records could not be accessed by the District Nurses while they were in Ms Bruce’s home. This meant that all information that could have been available was not. This meant that Ms Bruce’s change in condition was not fully appreciated. Leicestershire Partnership Trust have learned from this and District Nurse now have work mobile phones so that they can take photographic evidence of wounds as well as IT technology that means they can access the electronic records while they are with the patient. In addition, they also have a ‘sepsis’ bag containing equipment to record the blood pressure, oxygen saturation levels and temperature. Although this lesson has been learned and changes made to prevent future deaths locally, the concern is that the practice that was in place at the time of Ms Bruce’s death may be practice elsewhere. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.