Reginald Dixon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 Sep 2017•Black Country

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to accurately triage emergency calls
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency call handling
  2. Insufficient resources for timely emergency response

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust

    Write to the Clinical Commissioning Group about current resourcing provision and include the Preventing Future Death report.

  2. West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust

    Deliver further education and refresher training on head injuries through the NHS Pathways update.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust

    It is unclear whether the call was incorrectly categorised because the caller’s answers may not have supported a Category 2 response.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to accurately triage emergency calls

Wider context from the report

“1. Firstly, evidence emerged during the inquest that the second call received by the WMAS operator at 1921 hours had been incorrectly triaged as Level 3. The evidence of vomiting and drowsiness should have resulted in a Level 2 categorisation and therefore faster response time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe emergency call handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient resources for timely emergency response

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence also emerged during the inquest that there were insufficient resources available and average response times of 29 minutes. This delay posed a risk to patients. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to the Clinical Commissioning Group about current resourcing provision and include the Preventing Future Death report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response - The Trusts Director of Clinical Commissioning and Service Development/Executive Nurse has personally written to the Clinical Commissioning Group over the current resourcing provision and has included within that letter the Preventing Future Death report.”

Source location

2017-0214-Response-by-West-Midlands-Ambulance-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver further education and refresher training on head injuries through the NHS Pathways update.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following this serious incident WMAS have included further education and refresher training around head injuries during the NHS Pathways update due to take place in October/November.”

Source location

2017-0214-Response-by-West-Midlands-Ambulance-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

It is unclear whether the call was incorrectly categorised because the caller’s answers may not have supported a Category 2 response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response - The second 999 call had failed the audit completed against the Pathway system. The audit identified that the call assessor did not fully establish during the call the level of consciousness of the patient, further probing was required, due to the lack of probing on the call it is unclear whether the category 3 response which was generated was appropriate.”

Source location

2017-0214-Response-by-West-Midlands-Ambulance-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 25 September 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026