PFD report

Michael Kevin Amesbury · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Jul 2023•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure of inter-trust referral systems to provide timely electronic transfer of clinical information, images and notes
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care servicesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care
  2. Delays in cardiology clinic assessment due to insufficient clinician or appointment-slot availability
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely cardiology assessmentPart of recurring concern: Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care
  3. Insufficient trans-oesophageal echocardiogram resources
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of echocardiography services to provide timely diagnostic assessment and follow-up
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Discuss with information officers and the Digital Delivery Executive how to develop the referral-platform proposal into a funded project.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  2. Action

    Explore extending referral-platform benefits to other Greater Manchester services.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 July 2023.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of inter-trust referral systems to provide timely electronic transfer of clinical information, images and notes

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard evidence that Mr Amesbury needed to be referred from secondary to tertiary services within Greater Manchester. The inquest heard evidence that the speed and quality of that referral was impacted by the way in which information was shared between clinicians in different trusts within Greater Manchester. The use of different systems and reliance on postal services and lack of a clear, effective electronic system of referrals including transfer of images /notes meant there were delays in assessing patients which led to a delay in formulating a treatment plan in tertiary services; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services; Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in cardiology clinic assessment due to insufficient clinician or appointment-slot availability

Wider context from the report

“2. The evidence also indicated that there were delays in patients who had been identified as requiring cardiology input being seen in cardiology clinics due to availability of clinicians/appointment slots inquest. This was exacerbated where there was a need for trans-oesophageal echocardiogram due to resource issues. The inquest heard that this type of echocardiogram could be key in understanding the cardiac issues of a patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely cardiology assessment; Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient trans-oesophageal echocardiogram resources

Wider context from the report

“2. The evidence also indicated that there were delays in patients who had been identified as requiring cardiology input being seen in cardiology clinics due to availability of clinicians/appointment slots inquest. This was exacerbated where there was a need for trans-oesophageal echocardiogram due to resource issues. The inquest heard that this type of echocardiogram could be key in understanding the cardiac issues of a patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of echocardiography services to provide timely diagnostic assessment and follow-up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss with information officers and the Digital Delivery Executive how to develop the referral-platform proposal into a funded project.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work to resolve this aligns closely with the GM digital strategy, the opportunities that the ICB brings for visibility, spread and scale. GM ICB commits to exploring and as appropriate, implementing this across other GM services. We will be progressing this with chief information officers across the integrated care system for an outline discussion to consider how this could be worked up into a funded project within the strategy delivery plan.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore extending referral-platform benefits to other Greater Manchester services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“exploring. Attached as appendix 1 is a briefing note which outlines how a secondary to tertiary referral platform (Patient Pass) has been used to excellent effect in Renal, Neurosurge████████ Northern Care Alliance (NCA). There are significant benefits for outcomes re safety and productivity. We are looking at how we can bring the benefits of this type of technology to other services.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Cascade learning from this and similar cases to professionals through relevant governance and learning forums.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  2. 2

    Present the learning to the Greater Manchester System Quality Group for consideration in commissioned services.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  3. 3

    Monitor key learning points and recommendations to ensure they become embedded in practice.

    Stated by NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 July 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Cascade learning from this and similar cases to professionals through relevant governance and learning forums.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Shared learning from this and similar cases at Greater Manchester and borough level will be cascaded to professionals through relevant governance and learning forums to ensure that learning is incorporated into their services.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present the learning to the Greater Manchester System Quality Group for consideration in commissioned services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Actions taken or being taken to share learning across Greater Manchester:”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor key learning points and recommendations to ensure they become embedded in practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In conclusion, key learning points and recommendations will be monitored to ensure they are embedded within practice. NHS GM is committed to improving outcomes for the population of Greater Manchester.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026