PFD report

James Colin Day · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Feb 2024•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Difficult access to mental health support for service personnel with severe PTSD during service and following discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge
  2. Failure to provide adequate mental health support for service personnel with severe PTSD during service and following discharge
  3. Failure to recognise the significance of service-related traumatic events on the mental health of service personnel with severe PTSD
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Improve the overall level of support provided to Service Personnel and Veterans.

    Stated by Ministry of DefenceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 February 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Existing mental health services mean there is no immediate need to change MOD policies.

    Stated by Ministry of DefenceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Difficult access to mental health support for service personnel with severe PTSD during service and following discharge

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that James Day had served his country as a member of the armed services. He had been deployed to Afghanistan as part of his service where he had witnessed traumatic events that had led to him developing post-traumatic stress disorder. He needed support to help him deal with the trauma. However that had not been provided in such a way whilst he was serving to allow him to deal with his PTSD. He had subsequently left the army and had continued to struggle to cope with his PTSD. He used alcohol and prescribed medication to try and cope with the severe symptoms of his PTSD. The inquest heard that support for service personnel with severe PTSD such as Mr Day whilst they were still serving and following discharge was patchy, difficult to access and did not appear to recognise how significant the impact of events they had witnessed whilst serving could be on their mental health. The inquest heard that better mental health support whilst serving and following discharge may have avoided Mr Day having to turn to self-medication to try and have respite from his PTSD symptoms. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide adequate mental health support for service personnel with severe PTSD during service and following discharge

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that James Day had served his country as a member of the armed services. He had been deployed to Afghanistan as part of his service where he had witnessed traumatic events that had led to him developing post-traumatic stress disorder. He needed support to help him deal with the trauma. However that had not been provided in such a way whilst he was serving to allow him to deal with his PTSD. He had subsequently left the army and had continued to struggle to cope with his PTSD. He used alcohol and prescribed medication to try and cope with the severe symptoms of his PTSD. The inquest heard that support for service personnel with severe PTSD such as Mr Day whilst they were still serving and following discharge was patchy, difficult to access and did not appear to recognise how significant the impact of events they had witnessed whilst serving could be on their mental health. The inquest heard that better mental health support whilst serving and following discharge may have avoided Mr Day having to turn to self-medication to try and have respite from his PTSD symptoms. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise the significance of service-related traumatic events on the mental health of service personnel with severe PTSD

Wider context from the report

“The inquest heard evidence that James Day had served his country as a member of the armed services. He had been deployed to Afghanistan as part of his service where he had witnessed traumatic events that had led to him developing post-traumatic stress disorder. He needed support to help him deal with the trauma. However that had not been provided in such a way whilst he was serving to allow him to deal with his PTSD. He had subsequently left the army and had continued to struggle to cope with his PTSD. He used alcohol and prescribed medication to try and cope with the severe symptoms of his PTSD. The inquest heard that support for service personnel with severe PTSD such as Mr Day whilst they were still serving and following discharge was patchy, difficult to access and did not appear to recognise how significant the impact of events they had witnessed whilst serving could be on their mental health. The inquest heard that better mental health support whilst serving and following discharge may have avoided Mr Day having to turn to self-medication to try and have respite from his PTSD symptoms. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve the overall level of support provided to Service Personnel and Veterans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Considering this, and the suite of mental health services that do exist for the Armed Forces community, I do not feel there is an immediate need to change MOD policies in response to your Regulation 28 Report. However, that is not to assume everything is perfect, and I am committed to improving the overall level of support given to both Service Personnel and Veterans. I can assure you, and Mr Day’s family, that if there are any significant improvements that can be identified, steps will be taken to implement them.”

Source location

Response from Ministry of Defence
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing mental health services mean there is no immediate need to change MOD policies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Considering this, and the suite of mental health services that do exist for the Armed Forces community, I do not feel there is an immediate need to change MOD policies in response to your Regulation 28 Report. However, that is not to assume everything is perfect, and I am committed to improving the overall level of support given to both Service Personnel and Veterans. I can assure you, and Mr Day’s family, that if there are any significant improvements that can be identified, steps will be taken to implement them.”

Source location

Response from Ministry of Defence
Page 2 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The report may reflect an incomplete understanding of MOD medical history and support because MOD was not an interested person.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the specific case of Mr Day, I am concerned that the Ministry of Defence (MOD) were not considered an Interested Person at the inquest. This means your Regulation 28 Report may be based on an incomplete understanding of Mr Day’s medical history and the support that was provided to him by the MOD. I have asked the Head of the Defence Inquests Unit (DIU) to provide you separately with the details of the support Mr Day did receive.”

Source location

Response from Ministry of Defence
Page 1 · response
Published 14 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026