PFD report

Emma Jane SIMKIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Oct 2022•Lincolnshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to consider primary evidence from families alongside patients’ accounts when assessing masked mental illness
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably communicate with and listen to families of mental health patients
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Present masking at the next AMHP Forum to disseminate the coroner’s concerns and explore discussion and good-practice issues with AMHPs.

    Stated by Lincolnshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2022.
  2. Action

    Review policies to consider adding and strengthening references to masking where appropriate.

    Stated by Lincolnshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2022.
  3. Action

    Complete mandatory suicide and risk training for AMHPs, emphasising assessment of all case factors including family views.

    Stated by Lincolnshire County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Masking was not relevant to this case because the AMHPs did not see the deceased.

    Stated by Lincolnshire County CouncilDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider primary evidence from families alongside patients’ accounts when assessing masked mental illness

Wider context from the report

“Families are repeatedly advising their perception is that loved ones are successfully "masking" their mental illnesses in front of professionals who are perceived to accept at face value what they are told rather than looking at other primary evidence more often than not from the families themselves. which in turn leads the families to believe they are being ignored and lives lost. Can you reassure me that policies are in place that focus upon how to identify "masking" and adequate training to the appropriate professionals is up to date and consider if policies are in need of review. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably communicate with and listen to families of mental health patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present masking at the next AMHP Forum to disseminate the coroner’s concerns and explore discussion and good-practice issues with AMHPs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst there is no specific policy about masking due to the comprehensive nature of the code, the ongoing mandatory training and the robust measures in place to ensure that AMHPs remain competent to practice, it is the Council’s intention to review its policies with a view to adding in and strengthening its general policies to incorporate references where appropriate to masking. The Council also intends to put on the agenda of the next AMHP Forum the topic of "Masking" so that it can appraise all the AMHPs of the coroner’s general concerns about masking and to ensure that discussion and good practice issues can be explored with the AMHP group as a whole on that day. The Next AMHP forum is due to take place on Tuesday 10th January 2023 between 9.30 and 1.30pm.”

Source location

Response from Lincolnshire County Council
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review policies to consider adding and strengthening references to masking where appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst there is no specific policy about masking due to the comprehensive nature of the code, the ongoing mandatory training and the robust measures in place to ensure that AMHPs remain competent to practice, it is the Council’s intention to review its policies with a view to adding in and strengthening its general policies to incorporate references where appropriate to masking. The Council also intends to put on the agenda of the next AMHP Forum the topic of "Masking" so that it can appraise all the AMHPs of the coroner’s general concerns about masking and to ensure that discussion and good practice issues can be explored with the AMHP group as a whole on that day. The Next AMHP forum is due to take place on Tuesday 10th January 2023 between 9.30 and 1.30pm.”

Source location

Response from Lincolnshire County Council
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete mandatory suicide and risk training for AMHPs, emphasising assessment of all case factors including family views.

Verbatim wording from the response

“AMHPs must demonstrate competence in the application of knowledge of mental disorders, including the implications for patients, their relatives and their carers (2008 Regulations, para 3(c)). AMHP training highlights that those self-reporting mental health conditions may be motivated by factors such as a desire not to receive any further mental health support. For example, in 2021 AMHPs undertaking assessments on behalf of Lincolnshire County Council completed mandatory suicide and risk training which outlined specifically that whilst the person’s views were an important part of the assessment process, the evidence for risk in suicide should be based on a review of all the factors of the case, including the views of the family. AMHPs must demonstrate that they are competent in recognizing, assessing and managing risk effectively in the context of their role (2008 Regulations, para 4(f)),”

Source location

Response from Lincolnshire County Council
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Masking was not relevant to this case because the AMHPs did not see the deceased.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Lincolnshire County Council’s only involvement in this case was through its provision of Approved Mental Health Professionals. (AMHP). The Council did not attend the inquest, was not an interested party but did provide two statements from two AMHPs who were not required to give evidence. The AMHPs did not see the deceased at any point during their involvement. The issue therefore of “Masking” (hiding or suppressing symptoms of a mental health condition) was not relevant to the AMHP’s on the specific facts of this particular inquest. We further understand there is a no criticism of the local authority in this case.”

Source location

Response from Lincolnshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A separate masking policy is not currently considered necessary because statutory guidance, mandatory training and competency controls address the issue.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Council does not have a separate masking policy. However the AMHP is required to act in accordance with the Mental Health Act 1983 and in particular in accordance with the Mental Health Act 1983: Code of Practice. This Code of Practice is statutory guidance on how the AMHPs should carry out their functions under the Act. Furthermore, the council is required to test the competencies of the AMHPs it is responsible for approving in accordance with the Mental Health (Approved Mental Health Professionals (Approval) (England) Regulations 2008 as detailed in schedule 2.”

Source location

Response from Lincolnshire County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Introduce and implement the Lincolnshire suicide prevention strategy for 2020–2023.

    Stated by Lincolnshire County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce and implement the Lincolnshire suicide prevention strategy for 2020–2023.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Recognising the tragic impact of suicide on families, friends, and communities, in 2020, Lincolnshire introduced its suicide prevention strategy 2020-2023 which is supported by 26 different organisations across Lincolnshire. Its vision is to make Lincolnshire a place where suicide is not considered as an option and people continue to have hope. The Director of Public Health (DPH) is formally responsible for the development of a local Suicide Prevention Strategy and Action Plan through co-production with partners across Lincolnshire. The governance arrangements for the development and implementation of this strategy and action plan, including monitoring performance, lays with Lincolnshire Safeguarding Adults Board (LSAB) and Lincolnshire Safeguarding Children Partnership (LSCP), with assurance provided to the Lincolnshire Health and Well-being Board.”

Source location

Response from Lincolnshire County Council
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026