Howard Winter · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Feb 2018•South Wales Central

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to escalate neck or back pain findings to a doctor for reassessment, investigation and diagnosis
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior cliniciansPart of recurring concern: Failure to reliably communicate clinically significant patient observations to medical staff

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board

    Conduct two Health Board-wide audits of NEWS score completion and escalation.

  2. Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board

    Progress improvement work in priority clinical areas identified through the NEWS audit.

  3. Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board

    Monitor NEWS improvement work through quarterly quality reports to the Quality and Risk Safety Committee.

  4. Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board

    Maintain a Health Board Clinical Lead for RRAILS to oversee rapid-response acute-illness learning work.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate neck or back pain findings to a doctor for reassessment, investigation and diagnosis

Wider context from the report

“████████ gave evidence at the Inquest that on the 26.8.17 an auxiliary nurse had recorded in the nursing notes – “pain in neck/back – unable to score”. There was no evidence – written or otherwise, to demonstrate an escalation of this finding to a doctor for re-assessment, investigation & diagnosis. ████████ evidence to the Inquest was that this ought to have occurred. Whilst this apparent absence of escalation may not necessarily have affected the outcome for Mr Winter, were it to be repeated now, or in the future, the outcome for the patient involved could be potentially causative of/contribute towards death/adverse outcome. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians; Failure to reliably communicate clinically significant patient observations to medical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct two Health Board-wide audits of NEWS score completion and escalation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Two audits have been undertaken across the Health Board to measure how the NEWS scores are completed and escalated.”

Source location

2018-0040-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 7 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Progress improvement work in priority clinical areas identified through the NEWS audit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The audit has identified the need for further education and training as well as raising awareness amongst nursing and medical staff in relation to accurate documentation and escalation. The audit has also identified priority clinical areas for improvement work which will be progressed.”

Source location

2018-0040-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 7 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor NEWS improvement work through quarterly quality reports to the Quality and Risk Safety Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Monitoring of the improvement work is undertaken via the quarterly quality report to the Quality & Risk Safety Committee.”

Source location

2018-0040-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 7 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain a Health Board Clinical Lead for RRAILS to oversee rapid-response acute-illness learning work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We have a University Health Board Clinical Lead for the RRAILS (Rapid Response to Acute illness Learning Set) who is a Consultant Anaesthetist and also the National Lead overseeing this important piece of work.”

Source location

2018-0040-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 7 June 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026