PFD report

Lee Garfield DANIEL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Jan 2018•Isle of Wight

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of double yellow lines preventing lawful parking on the 20 metre portion of Coach Lane
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road markings for road-user safety
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The council considers the existing junction layout compliant with highway standards and good practice, so it will not change the parking restrictions.

    Stated by Isle of Wight CouncilExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of double yellow lines preventing lawful parking on the 20 metre portion of Coach Lane

Wider context from the report

“1. I have concerns about the road markings in Coach Lane, Brading. Had there been double yellow lines at the portion of the road where there were several legally parked vehicles (denoted on the attached map in the 20 metre boxed area), there would have been no necessity for Mr DANIEL to cross over onto the wrong side of the road, thereby affecting his visibility to any vehicle seeking to turn right across Coach Lane into Park Road. The extension of double yellow lines at that 20 metre portion of Coach Lane where cars can currently be lawfully parked can only enhance the safety of that stretch of road for the road users travelling in each direction. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road markings for road-user safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The council considers the existing junction layout compliant with highway standards and good practice, so it will not change the parking restrictions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Isle of Wight Council do not plan to implement any changes to the parking restrictions at the junction of Coach Lane and Park Road, Brading. We consider that the current layout is compliant with highway standards and general good practice.”

Source location

Lee-Daniel-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 12 January 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The council disputes that the highway condition or layout contributed to the incident or that the recommended parking restrictions would enhance road safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1.1 The council noted the content of the report including the “summary” which concluded that “there is nothing to indicate that the highway condition or layout contributed to this incident”. On that basis it was determined that no review was necessary in respect of existing network controls in this location.”

Source location

Lee-Daniel-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 12 January 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026