PFD report

Richard Boateng · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Sep 2021•South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
13

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of practical guidance for police conveyance of patients to hospital when ambulances are unavailable
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency access to hospital care
  2. Lack of guidance for surgeries on managing non-clinical judgments about appointment urgency
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable GP appointment triage for determining clinical urgency
  3. Failure to update and clarify ambulance-service guidance for crews and control staff
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.10

  1. Action

    Update policies OP14 and OP23 to incorporate case learning and step-by-step processes for frontline and control-room handling of vulnerable missing-person calls.

    Stated by London Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  2. Action

    Issue staff bulletins requiring frontline and control-room staff to search, verify, escalate vulnerable missing-person cases to police, and document actions.

    Stated by London Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  3. Action

    Communicate the finalized policy updates through staff bulletins, intranet, email, digital applications, and related staff communication channels.

    Stated by London Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    Existing policies were already compliant with national guidance, although a more specific step-by-step process was considered beneficial.

    Stated by London Ambulance Service NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of practical guidance for police conveyance of patients to hospital when ambulances are unavailable

Wider context from the report

“(3) College of Policing. Due to the Covid pandemic, no ambulances were available when police attended to Richard. The Metropolitan Police Service had a policy that permitted conveying patients to hospital in an emergency if no ambulances were available. However, the policy included no practical guidance as to how that could be achieved mitigating the risks. I heard that the Metropolitan Police Service is updating the guidance. However, I am concerned that other forces across the country may also lack such practical guidance, which is of particular concern due to ongoing pandemic and the demands that may continue of ambulance services. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency access to hospital care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance for surgeries on managing non-clinical judgments about appointment urgency

Wider context from the report

“(1) NHS England. A call to the GP surgery the day before Richard’s death was taken by a receptionist who arranged a routine appointment. She was not a clinician and only had on the job training. The surgery has since introduced a system called Klinik which is safer. It prompts questions and uses an algorithm to alert any urgent or emergency calls that are then flagged. All calls are also reviewed by clinicians. However, I am concerned that other surgeries may employ non-clinicians who may be required to make judgments as to the urgency of appointments, and there is no guidance available to surgeries as to how to mitigate the risks of this. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable GP appointment triage for determining clinical urgency.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to update and clarify ambulance-service guidance for crews and control staff

Wider context from the report

“(2) London Ambulance Service. The GP called LAS concerned about Richard’s welfare. LAS attended his home address. Richard was not there. The LAS paramedic advised his sister to call the police. The LAS quality manager accepted in evidence that it would have been better to have taken her number and to pass it on to the police to make contact. I was told that national guidance on this issue was published in the summer. To date, neither guidance to crews nor to control had been updated to make the LAS guidance clearer to those applying it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update policies OP14 and OP23 to incorporate case learning and step-by-step processes for frontline and control-room handling of vulnerable missing-person calls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We gave evidence at the inquest that national guidance for dealing with missing/absconded patients was issued to ambulance Trusts in April 2021. Although our policies OP14 and OP23 are already compliant with that guidance, it was accepted in evidence that it would be beneficial to update them to include a specific step by step process to be actioned by control room in conjunction with frontline staff.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue staff bulletins requiring frontline and control-room staff to search, verify, escalate vulnerable missing-person cases to police, and document actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Pending finalisation of the updates to those policies we have developed bulletins for the above cohorts of staff, which have been issued.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate the finalized policy updates through staff bulletins, intranet, email, digital applications, and related staff communication channels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“When the new policies are released, this will be communicated in the same ways”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Convert OP14 into a unified, hyperlinked live online document accessible to staff on scene through tablets.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work was already underway to make OP14 a unified document that would be a single ‘point of truth’ for information when staff have a specific policy or clinical question, with hyperlinks to relevant information and documents. This means that it will be a ‘live’ document online which can be updated quickly. It can be accessed by staff via their tablets when on scene.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide the updated policies to new starters and embed them in training for new entrants to relevant teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“as the staff bulletins, as set out above. New starters will also be provided with them and the policies will be embedded in training for new entrants to the relevant teams at LAS.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Digital First Primary Care guidance for implementing online consultations, including clinical safety, risk management, incident reporting, and limits on online triage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our Digital First Primary Care (DFPC) guidance for the implementation of Online Consultations puts a lot of focus on safety, though not specifically on the role of non-clinical staff: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/online-consultations-implementation-toolkit-v1.1-updated.pdf. This provides guidance on:”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide care-navigation training materials and funding to support receptionist-led information gathering and emergency-symptom identification.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that ‘Care Navigation’ as undertaken by receptionists, was fully supported in the NHS GP Forward View, with further training material and funding provided to support its implementation: https://www.england.nhs.uk/blog/plotting-the-right-path-with-care-navigators/.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a training programme with Health Education England for clinical and non-clinical staff supporting care navigation and emergency-symptom identification.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have developed a training pack for administrative staff which is intended to help support them with information gathering, care navigation and identifying emergency symptoms. The training pack is attached.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use developed Authorised Professional Practice to guide officers’ dynamic risk assessments and decisions when transporting patients without an ambulance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“That said, there will be instances when this may be necessary, and in those scenarios I would expect officers to conduct a dynamic risk assessment at the scene. The College has developed Authorised Professional Practice (APP) to aid decision making National Decision Model (college.police.uk); this practical guidance guides officers through a process of considering the information, assessing the risks, considering policy and available powers, identifying options and finally taking action. In the absence of an ambulance and taking account of the prevailing circumstances (in particular the risk to the patient), I consider that the APP already provides appropriate guidance.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-College-of-Policing_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Escalate the issue to the NPCC First Aid Forum for consideration of practical advice that can be offered to forces.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a matter of course, all coroner reports and requests related to the provision of first aid by police officers are reviewed by the NPCC First Aid Forum as a standing agenda item. My staff have spoken with the forum chair and have agreed to escalate this issue to the Forum for consideration as to what practical advice can be offered to forces.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-College-of-Policing_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing policies were already compliant with national guidance, although a more specific step-by-step process was considered beneficial.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We gave evidence at the inquest that national guidance for dealing with missing/absconded patients was issued to ambulance Trusts in April 2021. Although our policies OP14 and OP23 are already compliant with that guidance, it was accepted in evidence that it would be beneficial to update them to include a specific step by step process to be actioned by control room in conjunction with frontline staff.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-London-Ambulance-Service_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Each individual GP practice is responsible for ensuring its staff are suitably trained and experienced for delegated tasks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is the responsibility of each individual GP practice to ensure all staff are suitably trained and experienced to undertake the tasks that they are delegated.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Transportation of casualties to hospital falls outside the First Aid Learning Programme’s scope and first-aider responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College licences the First Aid Learning Programme (FALP) used by Home Office Forces, including the Metropolitan Police Service. The programme is endorsed by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). The College is responsible for ensuring appropriate quality assurance processes are in place to guide forces in the implementation of the HSE guidelines relating to the provision of first aid. However, transportation of casualties to hospital are not within the scope of the responsibility of a first aider (and therefore the FALP).”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-College-of-Policing_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing Authorised Professional Practice and dynamic risk assessment already provide appropriate guidance when officers transport casualties without an ambulance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“That said, there will be instances when this may be necessary, and in those scenarios I would expect officers to conduct a dynamic risk assessment at the scene. The College has developed Authorised Professional Practice (APP) to aid decision making National Decision Model (college.police.uk); this practical guidance guides officers through a process of considering the information, assessing the risks, considering policy and available powers, identifying options and finally taking action. In the absence of an ambulance and taking account of the prevailing circumstances (in particular the risk to the patient), I consider that the APP already provides appropriate guidance.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-College-of-Policing_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The College does not issue specific transport guidance because police conveyance carries inherent risks, liabilities and risks of normalising the practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The transportation of casualties in police vehicles carries inherent risks to the casualty, requiring skills and responsibilities significantly above those of a first aider, and significant liabilities to the officers themselves. For these reasons officers of police transporting casualties should be kept to the absolute minimum and there is concern that development of College issued guidance would not only ‘normalise’ such practices but add to an unrealistic expectation being placed on officers at the scene.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-College-of-Policing_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Provide a digital total-triage hard log, clinical safety risk-assessment template, and assurance guidance for practices and commissioners.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  2. 2

    Operate a clinical safety officer forum to discuss digital risks and collaboratively identify preventative measures.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.
  3. 3

    Continue working with forces, the NPCC and other agencies to raise standards of practice in caring for people who come to police attention.

    Stated by College of PolicingStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide a digital total-triage hard log, clinical safety risk-assessment template, and assurance guidance for practices and commissioners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that a significant increase in remote triaging, as used in general practice during the Covid-19 pandemic, has introduced a number of digital triage platforms and processes which can further support care navigation, including management of ‘red flag’ symptoms.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a clinical safety officer forum to discuss digital risks and collaboratively identify preventative measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHSEI also have a clinical safety officer forum where we discuss risks and issues, and collaboratively look at preventative measures.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with forces, the NPCC and other agencies to raise standards of practice in caring for people who come to police attention.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College is committed to continuing our work with forces, the NPCC and other agencies to raise standards of practice in the care of people who come to police attention. We would like to thank you for bringing the circumstances of Mr Boateng’s death to our attention so that we can ensure that our immediate and future work is informed by the events that culminated in his death.”

Source location

2021-0335-Response-from-College-of-Policing_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026