Investigation and inquest
On 12th December 2022 an investigation was commenced into the death of Gerald Roy Cruse. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27 November 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was:
Accident
The cause of death was recorded as:
1a) Pneumonia
1b) Rib fractures, haemopneumothorax
2) Osteoporosis, frailty, ischaemic heart disease, transient ischaemic attack
Circumstances of the death
On 23 November 2022, Gerald Cruse was taken to the Royal United Hospitals Bath by ambulance following a fall at home. He was assessed as being suitable for the Ambulance Cohort Area, which was run by Bristol Ambulance Emergency Medical Services. Mr Cruse was placed in a bed once he became available. He needed to use the toilet so a member of ambulance staff lowered the bed rails and sat Mr Cruse on the edge of the bed before then going to get a wheelchair to transport him to the toilets. Mr Cruse then stood up and fell. He sustained a significant chest injury, including multiple rib fractures, a haemopneumothorax and surgical emphysema. He was cared for on a surgical ward in accordance with the admissions pathway, with input from the older persons medical team. Despite active treatment, his condition deteriorated and he developed pneumonia. Mr Cruse died on 7 December 2022 at the Royal United Hospitals Bath.
Coroner’s concerns
Secretary of State for Health
(1) That over 75% of patients receiving hospital care are 65 and over. There is a conflict and tension between where within the hospital those patients should be receiving their care. A proportion of these patients require admission to a surgical ward due to the elements of their care which require surgical oversight and management, for example, analgesia through an epidural, insertion of a chest drain. However, this group of patients have multiple co-morbidities and complexities due to their age, which would be better managed by a medical team specialising in care of the elderly. Whilst medical teams can review patients, their limited resources mean it may not be as quickly as it needs to be, and they cannot be proactive in following up on the care of these patients. This results in an increasing risk that these patients will not receive the care they need in a timely manner. There is an increasing need for more doctors specialising in the care of older persons and this is a national issue.
(2) There are currently no clear guidelines as to how these patients should best be managed and there remains a serious risk that the care they receive is not holistic.
(3) Patients falling in hospitals and sustaining injuries which lead to their death remains a matter of grave concern.
Bristol Ambulance Emergency Medical Services
(4) The paramedic working within the cohort area did not complete a falls risk assessment in accordance with the JRCALC guidelines following the admission of a patient who had just had a fall at home.
(5) The other two ambulance staff did not seem to understand that Mr Cruse was a falls risk, they did not consider that he was at a greater risk of falls and did not consider that any further action should have been considered or taken.
(6) An investigation took place but the staff did not identify any learning and did not undertake the case study to help them identify such patients in the future. Bristol Ambulance Emergency Medical Services still run some cohort areas alongside South Western Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust, and continue to convey patients to hospital. The evidence given on behalf of this organisation did not provide reassurance that this is a matter which the ambulance service have adequately addressed. There is a real concern that ambulance staff throughout the organisation may not be adequately trained in recognising and dealing with patients who have had a fall or falls.