PFD report

Pamela June Conway · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Aug 2016•North Wales (East and Central)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of a finalised care pathway for patients presenting with an infected prosthesis
  2. Failure of patient flow within the Maelor Hospital causing delays in the Emergency Department
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain safe hospital patient flow
  3. Delays in transferring patients from ambulances and releasing ambulance resources for other calls
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a finalised care pathway for patients presenting with an infected prosthesis

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence at the inquest indicated that discussions were taking place between different departments within BCUHB with a view to agreeing a protocol to establish an appropriate care pathway for patients presenting to the hospital with an infected prosthesis, however nothing had been finalised regarding the same. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of patient flow within the Maelor Hospital causing delays in the Emergency Department

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence at the inquest indicated that the problem of “patient flow” within the Maelor Hospital continues to result in delays within the Emergency Department and it is of considerable concern to me that such problems have been the subject of previous regulation 28 reports and are also within the scope of a number of ongoing inquests. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain safe hospital patient flow.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in transferring patients from ambulances and releasing ambulance resources for other calls

Wider context from the report

“1. That notwithstanding changes which have been made by both BCUHB and WAST, there remain wholly unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls as a result of which the risk of future deaths continues. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in administering antibiotics after knee aspiration

Wider context from the report

“2. Furthermore evidence indicated that although it was always intended that antibiotics would be administered once the patient's knee had been aspirated, there was a delay of almost two hours between this procedure and the administration of antibiotics (a delay which was explained by being due to “normal hospital procedures”). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide required medication promptly when clinically needed; Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Scrutinize the two working action plans through the Assistant Director of Nursing and Hospital Medical Director.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 August 2016.
  2. 2

    Monitor progress on the two working action plans through the Quality and Safety Group.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 August 2016.
  3. 3

    Scrutinise action monitoring and agreed timescales through the Trust’s Quality, Patient Experience and Safety Committee.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 August 2016.
  4. 4

    Monitor organisational lessons and agreed actions through a senior-staff Task and Finish Group led by the Director of Quality, Safety and Patient Experience.

    Stated by Welsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 August 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Scrutinize the two working action plans through the Assistant Director of Nursing and Hospital Medical Director.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Therefore please find enclosed two working action plans relating to this case. The action plans will be scrutinized by the Assistant Director or Nursing as well as the Hospital Medical Director and will be monitored by the at the Quality and Safety Group to ensure timely progress.”

Source location

2016-0309-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 26 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor progress on the two working action plans through the Quality and Safety Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Therefore please find enclosed two working action plans relating to this case. The action plans will be scrutinized by the Assistant Director or Nursing as well as the Hospital Medical Director and will be monitored by the at the Quality and Safety Group to ensure timely progress.”

Source location

2016-0309-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 26 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Scrutinise action monitoring and agreed timescales through the Trust’s Quality, Patient Experience and Safety Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can assure you that as a consequence of this case we have learned lessons as an organisation which are being monitored through a Task and Finish Group of senior staff, led by the Director of Quality, Safety and Patient Experience. I would also like to assure you that the monitoring of the actions and agreed timescales will be scrutinised through the Trust’s Quality, Patient Experience and Safety Committee.”

Source location

2016-0309-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 26 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor organisational lessons and agreed actions through a senior-staff Task and Finish Group led by the Director of Quality, Safety and Patient Experience.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can assure you that as a consequence of this case we have learned lessons as an organisation which are being monitored through a Task and Finish Group of senior staff, led by the Director of Quality, Safety and Patient Experience. I would also like to assure you that the monitoring of the actions and agreed timescales will be scrutinised through the Trust’s Quality, Patient Experience and Safety Committee.”

Source location

2016-0309-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 26 August 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026