PFD report

Judith Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Nov 2025•Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of the Close Observation Risk Assessment to clearly distinguish fall-related scoring factors
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable patient observation arrangements
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Revise the Enhanced Care Risk Assessment Form to distinguish previous community falls from inpatient falls during the current admission.

    Stated by North West Anglia NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 November 2025.
  2. Action

    Review the relevant Policy and Form within the next few months and take the coroner’s comments into account.

    Stated by North West Anglia NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 November 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the Close Observation Risk Assessment to clearly distinguish fall-related scoring factors

Wider context from the report

“The Inquest heard evidence about the Trust's use of the 'Close Observation Risk Assessment' (p1903 Medical Records Bundle). This requires scores to be attributed to several factors including 'inpatient falls during this admission' and 'previous falls'. The overlap between these two factors and what they actually refer to is unclear and confusing. This creates a risk that the overall score may be calculated incorrectly resulting in insufficient levels of observation, increased risk of falls and death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable patient observation arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the Enhanced Care Risk Assessment Form to distinguish previous community falls from inpatient falls during the current admission.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Mrs Hughes died over five years ago on 7th October 2020. Policies and Forms are, of course, subjected to regular review. As was mentioned at the inquest the relevant Form had already been revised in 2022 (a copy of the Policy which contains this is enclosed) following a routine review of the Policy.”

Source location

Response from North West Anglia Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 11 November 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the relevant Policy and Form within the next few months and take the coroner’s comments into account.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The relevant Policy and Form are due to be reviewed again in the next few months and we will ensure that your comments are taken into account in this process.”

Source location

Response from North West Anglia Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 11 November 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026