PFD report

Adam Joseph Brunskill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Mar 2021•Black Country

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to ensure new employees have the required roofing experience, qualification and health and safety training
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe work-at-height operations
  2. Lack of designated on-site supervision and practical on-the-job training oversight
  3. Lack of a clear designated structured training programme for new and unqualified employees
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Implement a structured Pro-Clad training programme for new and unqualified employees.

    Stated by Wayne ClareyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 November 2021.
  2. Action

    Designate two supervisors to oversee worker training and safety.

    Stated by Wayne ClareyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 November 2021.
  3. Action

    Appraise workers daily, recommend further qualifications, and arrange workplace testing by outside agencies.

    Stated by Wayne ClareyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 November 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    Existing supervisory training and deputising arrangements were considered appropriate for the subcontractor’s team.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure new employees have the required roofing experience, qualification and health and safety training

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Coroner heard at inquest that Adam had been employed by Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding to work on a roof with no prior experience of working on a roof and no CSCS card nor had he completed a mandatory one-day Health & Safety course; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe work-at-height operations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of designated on-site supervision and practical on-the-job training oversight

Wider context from the report

“(2) On day 13/7/20 and 14/7/20 there was no evidence of a designated supervisor responsible for Adam on site and/or responsible for Adam’s practical on the job training; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear designated structured training programme for new and unqualified employees

Wider context from the report

“(3) The Coroner did hear in evidence that one of the Principal Contractors who provided regular work to Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding would undertake to train any future unqualified employees of Wayne Clarey and provide access to an accredited training qualification and training matrix. The Coroner also heard that Mr Clarey had legal responsibilities under the Health & Safety at Work Act and the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. However, there was no evidence of any clear designated structured training programme in place by Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding for new and/or unqualified employees; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clearly identifiable supervisory arrangements for new and unqualified employees

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Coroner did hear in evidence that one of the Principal Contractors who provided regular work to Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding would undertake to train any future unqualified employees of Wayne Clarey and provide access to an accredited training qualification and training matrix. The Coroner also heard that Mr Clarey had legal responsibilities under the Health & Safety at Work Act and the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. However, there was no evidence of any clearly identifiable supervisor and/or supervisory arrangements in place by Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding for new and/or unqualified employees; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an employee appraisal system

Wider context from the report

“(5) The Coroner did hear in evidence that one of the Principal Contractors who provided regular work to Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding would undertake to train any future unqualified employees of Wayne Clarey and provide access to an accredited training qualification and training matrix. The Coroner also heard that Mr Clarey had legal responsibilities under the Health & Safety at Work Act and the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. However, there was no evidence of any appraisal system in place by Wayne Clarey Roofing and Cladding. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable staff appraisal and performance-review processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a structured Pro-Clad training programme for new and unqualified employees.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Since the inquest, Wayne Clarey Roofing has been using a clear designated structured training programme for new and/or unqualified employees. It is the Pro-Clad training structure. It was stated at the inquest by ████████ that ████████ is an employee of Pro-Clad as 99% of his work is carried out for Pro-Clad.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Wayne-Clarey-Roofing-Cladding-Ltd_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Designate two supervisors to oversee worker training and safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The 2 supervisors are ████████ and ████████. This was confirmed in the inquest by both men.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Wayne-Clarey-Roofing-Cladding-Ltd_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appraise workers daily, recommend further qualifications, and arrange workplace testing by outside agencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. ████████ appraises the workers on a daily basis and recommends them for further qualification which is tested by outside agencies whilst they are at work.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Wayne-Clarey-Roofing-Cladding-Ltd_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing supervisory training and deputising arrangements were considered appropriate for the subcontractor’s team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████ and one of his workers had SSSTS, which is an appropriate level of supervisory training for them, for a team of four, including deputising cover if ████████ was not on site.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Health-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a designated supervisor was not considered to have caused the death because physical fall prevention should have prevented it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Similarly, whilst we do not believe that lack of a designated supervisor led to Adam’s death, as it should have been prevented by physically stopping a fall from the roof to the floor below, we agree with the Coroner in this matter as well that future deaths may be prevented by improvements in supervision.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Health-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Principal Contractor’s training-matrix system, including appraisals and training-needs analysis, was considered sufficient for subcontractors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In their revised Contract For Services document, Proclad state that their training matrix system will be available to subcontractors. As Wayne Clarey Roofing & Cladding Ltd continue to work full time for Proclad, and they fully use their systems, this will include appraisals and training needs analysis.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Health-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 4 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of training was not considered the main cause of the accident; failure to prevent the fall was the material safety issue.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is important to make clear HSE’s view that regardless of his experience or inexperience, Adam Brunskill’s death should have been prevented, not by training, but by the risk assessor recognising the fragile nature of the rooflights during their risk assessment, and by the consequent management of that risk. This could have been by means of avoiding the risk with collective means or personal means, by barriers or coverings, and by netting below to minimise the consequences of a fall through the fragile surfaces. The fall from roof to floor should not have been possible.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Health-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing Principal Contractor training support and training-matrix arrangements, extended to subcontractors, were considered sufficient for identified training needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In their revised Contract For Services document, Proclad state that they are happy to provide support to subcontractors in facilitating training for workers, and to grant access to their training matrix systems. Wayne Clarey Roofing & Cladding Ltd will use this arrangement.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Health-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing training, supervision and external assessment arrangements are treated as sufficient for future trainees and experienced workers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“When questioned about future trainees ████████ stated that he would never put himself in the position of having a new trainee as he could not, in all conscience, take on anyone again because of the accidental death of Adam. Therefore he restricts ourselves to the hypothetical situation of a new trainee skilled being placed on an induction course under supervision. ████████ would insist that any trainee would have to have the mandatory card and undertake the health and safety course. Also, as 99.9% of his work is with Pro-Clad, he would ensure that he would make himself available to use their training and also set out a full training schedule with checks by both himself and Pro-Clad. In relation to new workers with experience, again he would make sure that he adopted the Pro-Clad training structure.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Wayne-Clarey-Roofing-Cladding-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The Principal Contractor is responsible for ensuring roof workers are prevented from falling through fragile roofing to the floor below.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Principal Contractor is responsible for ensuring roof workers are prevented from falling through fragile roofing to the floor below.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The dutyholder responsible for ensuring that roof workers are prevented from falling through the fragile roof to the floor below is the Principal Contractor.”

Source location

2021-0384-Response-from-Health-Safety-Executive_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 18 November 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026