Amanda Susan Harris · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Jun 2015•North London

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to ensure doctor assessment before discharge from the Minor Injuries Unit
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  2. Failure to assess injury-related immobility and its effects when arranging fracture clinic appointments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable care and follow-up for identified fractures
  3. Failure to consider anticoagulant therapy
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe anticoagulant management
No response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is included in the published responses for this report.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure doctor assessment before discharge from the Minor Injuries Unit

Wider context from the report

“That Mrs Harris was not seen by a doctor before leaving the Minor Injuries Unit, that anticoagulant therapy was not considered and that when fixing an appointment for the fracture clinic the potential immobility from the injury and the effects of that immobility were not assessed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess injury-related immobility and its effects when arranging fracture clinic appointments

Wider context from the report

“That Mrs Harris was not seen by a doctor before leaving the Minor Injuries Unit, that anticoagulant therapy was not considered and that when fixing an appointment for the fracture clinic the potential immobility from the injury and the effects of that immobility were not assessed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable care and follow-up for identified fractures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider anticoagulant therapy

Wider context from the report

“That Mrs Harris was not seen by a doctor before leaving the Minor Injuries Unit, that anticoagulant therapy was not considered and that when fixing an appointment for the fracture clinic the potential immobility from the injury and the effects of that immobility were not assessed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe anticoagulant management.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.