PFD report

Antony Michael Rogivska · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Jul 2019•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Road traffic collision hazard at the junctions of Cooper Lane and Carr House Road and the Cooper Lane and Carr House Lane mini-roundabout
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Implement revised signing and lining, including textured lining and rumble strips, at the Carr House Lane and Cooper Lane mini-roundabout.

    Stated by Calderdale Council HighwaysStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 September 2019.
  2. Action

    Review the mini-roundabout and wider traffic flows, including whether additional land is needed, to assess an improvement scheme.

    Stated by Calderdale Council HighwaysStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 September 2019.
  3. Action

    Issue a project brief for a further improvement scheme at the Carr House Lane and Cooper Lane mini-roundabout.

    Stated by Calderdale Council HighwaysStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 September 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The Carr House Road and Cooper Lane junction layout was not considered contributory to collisions, so no further action was planned.

    Stated by Calderdale Council HighwaysDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Road traffic collision hazard at the junctions of Cooper Lane and Carr House Road and the Cooper Lane and Carr House Lane mini-roundabout

Wider context from the report

“(1) There is a history of road traffic collisions involving both vehicles and property at the junctions of Cooper Lane and Carr House Road and at the mini-roundabout at the crossroads formed by Cooper Lane and Carr House Lane. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement revised signing and lining, including textured lining and rumble strips, at the Carr House Lane and Cooper Lane mini-roundabout.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following a review of this junction a revised package of signing and lining was implemented during financial year 2017/18. This includes more robust, textured lining and rumble strips on each arm with the aim of ensuring that drivers approach at a safe speed and give way to vehicles already on the roundabout.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale Council
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the mini-roundabout and wider traffic flows, including whether additional land is needed, to assess an improvement scheme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The number of reported injury collisions at this junction reduced to 2 slight injuries during 2018 which suggests that the intervention has had some impact. However we are aware that there continue to be incidents at this location and as a result a project brief was issued in May this year (attached) with a view to implementing an improvement scheme as part of the Council’s Local Transport Plan programme for 2020/21. Whilst our previous review was limited to the immediate extents of the junction within the highway boundary this new review will consider whether there is a need for additional land to be taken from neighbouring properties and will also consider potential changes to traffic flows across a wider area.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale Council
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a project brief for a further improvement scheme at the Carr House Lane and Cooper Lane mini-roundabout.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The number of reported injury collisions at this junction reduced to 2 slight injuries during 2018 which suggests that the intervention has had some impact. However we are aware that there continue to be incidents at this location and as a result a project brief was issued in May this year (attached) with a view to implementing an improvement scheme as part of the Council’s Local Transport Plan programme for 2020/21. Whilst our previous review was limited to the immediate extents of the junction within the highway boundary this new review will consider whether there is a need for additional land to be taken from neighbouring properties and will also consider potential changes to traffic flows across a wider area.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale Council
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Carr House Road and Cooper Lane junction layout was not considered contributory to collisions, so no further action was planned.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To date there are no recorded collisions during 2019. Having reviewed the circumstances set out within the records Calderdale Council Highways have concluded that the layout of the junction is not a contributory factor in these collisions and therefore no further action is planned.”

Source location

Response from Calderdale Council
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026