PFD report

Carol Lynne Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Aug 2014•West Yorkshire (Eastern)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to routinely administer chemical thromboprophylaxis to conservatively treated lower-limb injury patients in immobilising casts considered at low risk of venous thromboembolism
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism
  2. Failure to undertake formal venous thromboembolism risk assessments for patients with conservatively treated lower-limb injuries in immobilising casts
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely administer chemical thromboprophylaxis to conservatively treated lower-limb injury patients in immobilising casts considered at low risk of venous thromboembolism

Wider context from the report

“1. I understand that at the time it was not standard practice in either the Orthopaedic Department or the Emergency Department at Harrogate District Hospital to routinely administer Chemical Thrombo Prophylaxis to patients with conservatively treated lower limb injuries immobilising cast considered to be at low risk of venous thromboembolism. 2. Nor was it standard practice in the Trust for a formal venous thromboembolism risk assessment to be undertaken in this patient group. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to undertake formal venous thromboembolism risk assessments for patients with conservatively treated lower-limb injuries in immobilising casts

Wider context from the report

“1. I understand that at the time it was not standard practice in either the Orthopaedic Department or the Emergency Department at Harrogate District Hospital to routinely administer Chemical Thrombo Prophylaxis to patients with conservatively treated lower limb injuries immobilising cast considered to be at low risk of venous thromboembolism. 2. Nor was it standard practice in the Trust for a formal venous thromboembolism risk assessment to be undertaken in this patient group. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.