PFD report

Mary Magdalene Marshall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Mar 2015•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of hospitals to inform General Practitioners of GDH positive results
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted uponPart of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical correspondence from healthcare services to GPs
  2. Lack of awareness of the significance of GDH positive results for future antibiotic prescribing
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Deliver national antimicrobial-resistance workshops and a national C. difficile study day promoting testing and appropriate antibiotic prescribing.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 March 2015.
  2. Action

    Work with partners to develop wider understanding of C. difficile testing and the implications of results, including GDH testing.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 March 2015.
  3. Action

    Explore methods to support local health communities in reporting and sharing patients’ C. difficile status.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 March 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of hospitals to inform General Practitioners of GDH positive results

Wider context from the report

“ii. The evidence indicated that there was a lack of awareness, in general, of the importance of GDH positive results in relation to the future prescription of antibiotics and the risk of the development of Clostridium Difficile infection. Furthermore there is a lack of awareness amongst General Practitioners in relation to GDH positive results. iii. The evidence indicated that there were Hospital Trusts in the North West that did not inform General Practitioners of GDH positive results and it is believed that a similar problem may exist Nationwide. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon; Unreliable clinical correspondence from healthcare services to GPs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of awareness of the significance of GDH positive results for future antibiotic prescribing

Wider context from the report

“ii. The evidence indicated that there was a lack of awareness, in general, of the importance of GDH positive results in relation to the future prescription of antibiotics and the risk of the development of Clostridium Difficile infection. Furthermore there is a lack of awareness amongst General Practitioners in relation to GDH positive results. iii. The evidence indicated that there were Hospital Trusts in the North West that did not inform General Practitioners of GDH positive results and it is believed that a similar problem may exist Nationwide. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver national antimicrobial-resistance workshops and a national C. difficile study day promoting testing and appropriate antibiotic prescribing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Nevertheless, appropriate information relating to a patient’s CDI status is essential for informing the most appropriate care and treatment. Nationally work is already being undertaken to ensure that this is recognised. As part of NHS England’s Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) work programme, work has been undertaken to promote the importance of C. diff testing. This has been achieved in part by the delivery of three national AMR workshops and a national clostridium difficile study day. All materials will be made available on the NHS England Patient Safety Domain webpage”

Source location

2015-0084-Response-by-Department-of-Health1
Page 3 · response
Published 6 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with partners to develop wider understanding of C. difficile testing and the implications of results, including GDH testing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To ensure this work is developed further, and in light of the recommendations made, NHS England will work with partners to continue to explore ways to develop a wider understanding of C. diff testing and the implications of the results, including but not limited to GDH testing.”

Source location

2015-0084-Response-by-Department-of-Health1
Page 3 · response
Published 6 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore methods to support local health communities in reporting and sharing patients’ C. difficile status.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Methods to support local health communities in the reporting and sharing of information in relation to a patient’s CDI status will also be explored. More widely, NHS England is already working on ideas for improving the provision of information between hospitals and primary care upon patient discharge. This will be informed by examples of best practice implemented locally and by consulting with relevant partners and subject matter experts to determine how information should be disseminated.”

Source location

2015-0084-Response-by-Department-of-Health1
Page 3 · response
Published 6 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop hospital-to-primary-care information sharing on patient discharge, informed by local best practice and consultation with relevant partners and experts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Methods to support local health communities in the reporting and sharing of information in relation to a patient’s CDI status will also be explored. More widely, NHS England is already working on ideas for improving the provision of information between hospitals and primary care upon patient discharge. This will be informed by examples of best practice implemented locally and by consulting with relevant partners and subject matter experts to determine how information should be disseminated.”

Source location

2015-0084-Response-by-Department-of-Health1
Page 3 · response
Published 6 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make national workshop and study-day materials available on the NHS England Patient Safety Domain webpage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Nevertheless, appropriate information relating to a patient’s CDI status is essential for informing the most appropriate care and treatment. Nationally work is already being undertaken to ensure that this is recognised. As part of NHS England’s Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) work programme, work has been undertaken to promote the importance of C. diff testing. This has been achieved in part by the delivery of three national AMR workshops and a national clostridium difficile study day. All materials will be made available on the NHS England Patient Safety Domain webpage”

Source location

2015-0084-Response-by-Department-of-Health1
Page 3 · response
Published 6 March 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.3

  1. 1

    Changes to national guidance on treating GDH-positive, toxin-negative patients are not required because robust evidence on best practice is lacking.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.
  2. 2

    The available information does not establish that amoxicillin was inappropriate; it is a reasonable community-care choice with comparatively lower C. difficile risk.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  3. 3

    A GDH-positive result does not by itself indicate vulnerability to developing C. difficile infection because it does not establish toxigenicity.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Changes to national guidance on treating GDH-positive, toxin-negative patients are not required because robust evidence on best practice is lacking.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, the Department of Health’s guidance is purposely cautious with regards to the treatment of GDH positive, toxin negative patients due to the lack of robust evidence regarding best practice. For this reason our expert advisers have recommended that changes to the national guidance are not required.”

Source location

2015-0084-Response-by-Department-of-Health1
Page 3 · response
Published 6 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The available information does not establish that amoxicillin was inappropriate; it is a reasonable community-care choice with comparatively lower C. difficile risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In Mrs Marshall’s case, the absence of the information from a toxin test and other clinical information, makes it difficult to determine whether or not amoxicillin was the most appropriate treatment. It is a reasonable choice of antibiotic to treat a chest infection in community care and, as outlined by NICE, Evidence Summary, Clostridium difficile infection: risk with broad-spectrum antibiotics (2015), it presents a lower risk in relation to C. diff compared to other broad spectrum antibiotics.”

Source location

2015-0084-Response-by-Department-of-Health1
Page 2 · response
Published 6 March 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A GDH-positive result does not by itself indicate vulnerability to developing C. difficile infection because it does not establish toxigenicity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst a GDH positive result may identify the presence of C. diff, it does not identify whether the strain is toxigenic or non-toxigenic and the additional toxin test outlined above is therefore required. In addition, being colonised by C. diff can provide some protection against CDI. Therefore, it is not entirely accurate to say that a GDH positive result indicates vulnerability to the development of C. diff infection.”

Source location

2015-0084-Response-by-Department-of-Health1
Page 2 · response
Published 6 March 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026