PFD report

Dorothy Margaret Hoyberg · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Jan 2026•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to maintain welfare calls at least every 30 minutes
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to conduct required welfare checks on people in distress
  2. Insufficient ambulance service capacity causing delays in ambulance responses
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance attendancePart of recurring concern: Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Action

    Publish the 2025/26 Urgent and Emergency Care Plan to improve ambulance response times and patient flow.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 January 2026.
  2. Action

    Publish the 10 Year Health Plan for England, setting a trajectory towards prevention and reduced urgent-care demand.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 January 2026.
  3. Action

    Continue coordinating with commissioners, integrated care boards, providers and ambulance services to deliver urgent and emergency care improvement plans.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 January 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain welfare calls at least every 30 minutes

Wider context from the report

“On 19 June 2025 London Ambulance Service (LAS) were operating at REAP Level 4 (extreme pressure) and by 9am that day, targets were being breached. Multiple attempts were made to find an ambulance resource for Dorothy but LAS were unable to meet targets for Category 3 patients and were struggling to meet targets for Category 2 patients. Welfare calls were made to Dorothy until 12:25 at which point the demand on LAS was so high that there was no capacity to make any further welfare calls. Ideally welfare calls should have been made at least every 30 minutes but it was necessary for LAS to prioritise demand and deploy clinicians where they were most needed. Demand outstripped capacity. An ambulance should have reached Dorothy within two hours but it took five and half. I heard evidence that this is a pan-London problem, and it does not appear to be restricted to London. The demand on ambulance services is increasing and the number of patients requiring their services is increasing. Ambulance services are under extreme pressure and this is causing a systems challenge and long delays for patients. LAS are currently operating at REAP Level 4. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to conduct required welfare checks on people in distress.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient ambulance service capacity causing delays in ambulance responses

Wider context from the report

“On 19 June 2025 London Ambulance Service (LAS) were operating at REAP Level 4 (extreme pressure) and by 9am that day, targets were being breached. Multiple attempts were made to find an ambulance resource for Dorothy but LAS were unable to meet targets for Category 3 patients and were struggling to meet targets for Category 2 patients. Welfare calls were made to Dorothy until 12:25 at which point the demand on LAS was so high that there was no capacity to make any further welfare calls. Ideally welfare calls should have been made at least every 30 minutes but it was necessary for LAS to prioritise demand and deploy clinicians where they were most needed. Demand outstripped capacity. An ambulance should have reached Dorothy within two hours but it took five and half. I heard evidence that this is a pan-London problem, and it does not appear to be restricted to London. The demand on ambulance services is increasing and the number of patients requiring their services is increasing. Ambulance services are under extreme pressure and this is causing a systems challenge and long delays for patients. LAS are currently operating at REAP Level 4. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance attendance; Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the 2025/26 Urgent and Emergency Care Plan to improve ambulance response times and patient flow.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To prioritise and improve the quality and timeliness of patient care, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England published the 2025/26 Urgent and Emergency Care Plan (June 2025) and the 10 Year Health Plan for England: Fit for the Future (July 2025). The Urgent and Emergency Care Plan commits to reducing mean ambulance response times for Category 2 patients by over 14%, to 30 minutes and improving the clinical validation of Category 3 and 4 calls. To achieve this, we recognise we will need to make improvements to patient flow through the whole system, and the plan outlines a set of priority actions to support systems to maximise patient flow, including:”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the 10 Year Health Plan for England, setting a trajectory towards prevention and reduced urgent-care demand.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To prioritise and improve the quality and timeliness of patient care, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England published the 2025/26 Urgent and Emergency Care Plan (June 2025) and the 10 Year Health Plan for England: Fit for the Future (July 2025). The Urgent and Emergency Care Plan commits to reducing mean ambulance response times for Category 2 patients by over 14%, to 30 minutes and improving the clinical validation of Category 3 and 4 calls. To achieve this, we recognise we will need to make improvements to patient flow through the whole system, and the plan outlines a set of priority actions to support systems to maximise patient flow, including:”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue coordinating with commissioners, integrated care boards, providers and ambulance services to deliver urgent and emergency care improvement plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England actions NHS England continues to work closely with commissioners, Integrated Care Boards, acute providers, and ambulance services, including London Ambulance Service, to support delivery of stretching but achievable plans aligned with operational priorities. The risks associated with community waits for ambulances have been discussed at national forums to support shared understanding and coordinated action across urgent and emergency care pathways on measures such as implementing the 45-minute maximum handover requirement; expanding urgent community care provision; reducing length of stay; and supporting timely patient discharge. These measures are designed to maintain patient flow, reduce emergency department crowding and facilitate prompt ambulance handovers.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement dedicated clinical support linked to dispatch to identify incidents requiring prioritisation of clinical resources.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The LAS maintains a performance recovery plan, which is regularly updated in response to changes in the demand profile and system pressures. This includes the implementation of dedicated clinical support linked to dispatch to identify incidents where allocation of a clinical resource may need to be prioritised.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 3 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce hospital handover-delay mitigation by directing crews to hospitals with greater capacity and cohorting patients when necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“London Ambulance Service Trust Actions The LAS has introduced multiple processes to mitigate the issue of hospital handover delay for example: directing crews conveying patients towards hospitals with greater capacity and cohorting patients at hospitals (two or three staff taking responsibility for additional patients, so that other crews can become available for calls more quickly) where necessary. The Trust is currently in the middle of its five-year strategy (2023-2028). This strategy aims to forge closer links between Primary and Acute care sectors and Local Authorities, ensuring the right care is provided at the right time, including the development and referral to alternative care pathways avoiding the need to convey to hospital when appropriate.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Allocate national capital funding for urgent treatment centres, same-day emergency care expansion and new ambulances.

Verbatim wording from the response

“More than £370 million of capital funding has been allocated nationally to support implementation, including £250 million of capital budget to continue the expansion of co-located urgent treatment centres and same day emergency care, and £75 million capital funding for new ambulances. The 10 Year Plan for England also sets out a clear trajectory towards shifting from treatment to prevention, reducing overall demand for urgent care.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide national growth funding to ambulance services to support activity and service improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In 2025/26, all ambulance services received national growth funding to support activity levels and incentivise service improvement. Performance improvements have been observed in LAS, between January 2025 and January 2026:”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain and regularly update the performance recovery plan in response to demand and system pressures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The LAS maintains a performance recovery plan, which is regularly updated in response to changes in the demand profile and system pressures. This includes the implementation of dedicated clinical support linked to dispatch to identify incidents where allocation of a clinical resource may need to be prioritised.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 3 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and refer patients to alternative care pathways, where appropriate, to avoid conveyance to hospital.

Verbatim wording from the response

“London Ambulance Service Trust Actions The LAS has introduced multiple processes to mitigate the issue of hospital handover delay for example: directing crews conveying patients towards hospitals with greater capacity and cohorting patients at hospitals (two or three staff taking responsibility for additional patients, so that other crews can become available for calls more quickly) where necessary. The Trust is currently in the middle of its five-year strategy (2023-2028). This strategy aims to forge closer links between Primary and Acute care sectors and Local Authorities, ensuring the right care is provided at the right time, including the development and referral to alternative care pathways avoiding the need to convey to hospital when appropriate.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Add the Regulation 28 report to the next quarterly engagement meeting agenda for discussion and follow-up.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 January 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add the Regulation 28 report to the next quarterly engagement meeting agenda for discussion and follow-up.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Care Quality Commission Actions The Care quality Commission (CQC) are sorry to hear of the death of Ms Hoyberg. CQC have added discussion of this Regulation 28 report to the agenda for the next quarterly engagement meeting with the trust for discussion and follow up of any action taken by the trust.”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 3 · response
Published 21 January 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026