PFD report

David Glyn Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Jun 2015•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to maintain an effective swab counting control during surgical procedures
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable surgical counting controls
  2. Failure to maintain complete, dated, signed and attributable handwritten medical and nursing notes
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
  3. Failure to review or discontinue repeat prescriptions when medicines are no longer needed or when required monitoring is missed
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable review and monitoring of repeat prescriptionsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe medication prescribing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain an effective swab counting control during surgical procedures

Wider context from the report

“4. There did not seem to be in place any, or any satisfactory, swab count policy, such that none of the nurses during any of the three heart procedures, noticed that there was a discrepancy.(UHSM) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable surgical counting controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain complete, dated, signed and attributable handwritten medical and nursing notes

Wider context from the report

“2. The quality of the handwritten notes (both medical and nursing) was nothing short of very poor. They were frequently undated, unsigned and there was no indication in block letters as to who was completing the notes, his/her professional status etc.(For UHSM) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review or discontinue repeat prescriptions when medicines are no longer needed or when required monitoring is missed

Wider context from the report

“1.Before he was admitted to hospital his G.P. was prescribing warfarin and this continued over many months despite the fact that he failed on three occasions to attend the anti- coagulation clinic. There is apparently no system to prevent this happening. I have noted in many inquests that people who have “repeat prescriptions” continue to get all the drugs prescribed even if they are no longer needed or wanted, thus potentially placing the patient at considerable health risk but also costing the NHS a vast amount of money for unwanted and unused drugs.(For the Secretary of State) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable review and monitoring of repeat prescriptions; Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to recognise and act on clinically significant radiology findings

Wider context from the report

“3. Even though a “specialist radiologist” looked at the X-Rays, and noted that they appeared to show a foreign body within the thorax of the patient, this was not read or seen by any of the treating doctors, or if it was seen it was not in any way acted upon. (This was of course an image of the rogue swab which was left in the body.) (UHSM) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.