PFD report

Clifford Irwin Crofts · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Feb 2016•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Delays and restricted access in obtaining urgent CT scans
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely access to clinically indicated CT scanningPart of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely urgent diagnostic investigations
  2. Failure of the process for escalating care within and between disciplines
  3. Lack of accessible guidance on the process for arranging CT scans
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety guidance for CT scanning and reporting
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Action

    Pilot an SBAR-based inpatient referral template on the labour ward, specifying response seniority, review timescales and escalation steps.

    Stated by Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 22 February 2016.
  2. Action

    Provide an online nutritional-care training module covering feeding enterostomies and signpost junior doctors during induction.

    Stated by Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 February 2016.
  3. Action

    Schedule feeding enterostomy procedures on weekdays to enable Nutritional Support Specialist Nurses to provide directed ward training.

    Stated by Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 22 February 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Current contractual restrictions limit the ability to roster doctors for elective work during premium time, constraining implementation of identified safe staffing levels.

    Stated by Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays and restricted access in obtaining urgent CT scans

Wider context from the report

“(3) There were considerable difficulties obtaining a CT scan on Sunday, 21 September 2014. This was partly because it was not actioned at 16.00, when requested. After 17.00 on the weekend the request had to be made by a consultant to an outside provider Medica who read the scans when no-one is available at the hospital. It appears that junior doctors can now request CT scans and that a new arrangement is being put in place to obtain urgent CT scans in cases of suspected peritonitis. The SI report recommends that guidance relating to CT scanning on the trust intranet should be reviewed to clarify the process for arranging investigations and be made available as part of the induction process for junior doctors and on the ward areas, for other staff to access. I was informed this has not yet been actioned. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely access to clinically indicated CT scanning; Failure to provide timely urgent diagnostic investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the process for escalating care within and between disciplines

Wider context from the report

“(2) There were considerable difficulties in escalating Mr Crofts’ care on 20 and 21 September 2014. The SI report recommends that the process by which care is escalated within and between disciplines needs to be reviewed and clarified to ensure that patients receive timely attention. Again, I am not satisfied on the evidence I have heard that this recommendation has been implemented. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of accessible guidance on the process for arranging CT scans

Wider context from the report

“(3) There were considerable difficulties obtaining a CT scan on Sunday, 21 September 2014. This was partly because it was not actioned at 16.00, when requested. After 17.00 on the weekend the request had to be made by a consultant to an outside provider Medica who read the scans when no-one is available at the hospital. It appears that junior doctors can now request CT scans and that a new arrangement is being put in place to obtain urgent CT scans in cases of suspected peritonitis. The SI report recommends that guidance relating to CT scanning on the trust intranet should be reviewed to clarify the process for arranging investigations and be made available as part of the induction process for junior doctors and on the ward areas, for other staff to access. I was informed this has not yet been actioned. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety guidance for CT scanning and reporting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of staff awareness and understanding of enterostomy care policies and guidance

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Trust’s care plan no 94 RIG was not followed. The SI report dated the 20 August 2015 (page 19) recommends that relevant staff members are aware of and understand the policies, guidance and supporting documentation which relate to the care of patients who have undergone enterostomies. I was informed this recommendation had not yet been put into effect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient numbers of doctors at all levels of seniority available at weekends

Wider context from the report

“(4)During the course of evidence it became clear that the delay in attempts to escalate Mr Crofts’ care over the weekend was due in large part to staffing levels. Whilst I heard that staffing levels at weekends have increased since 2014, it was not clear that the number of doctors at all levels of seniority available at weekends is sufficient to provide safe care to in patients at the hospital particularly at times when emergencies arise in A and E. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care; Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow care plans for patients who have undergone enterostomies

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Trust’s care plan no 94 RIG was not followed. The SI report dated the 20 August 2015 (page 19) recommends that relevant staff members are aware of and understand the policies, guidance and supporting documentation which relate to the care of patients who have undergone enterostomies. I was informed this recommendation had not yet been put into effect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pilot an SBAR-based inpatient referral template on the labour ward, specifying response seniority, review timescales and escalation steps.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Difficulties with inter-specialty referral of inpatients have been identified in several SI reports and a pilot scheme has been developed for use on labour ward which utilises a referral template based on SBAR principles. SBAR is a formal communication tool recommended by the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement which consists of standardised prompt questions within four sections (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation), to ensure that staff are sharing concise and focused information. It allows staff to communicate assertively and effectively.”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide an online nutritional-care training module covering feeding enterostomies and signpost junior doctors during induction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A module has been produced for our on line training system for staff (Training Tracker) which covers many aspects of nutritional care including the use and complication of feeding enterostomies. Our junior doctors are signposted to this system and its contents during their induction program prior to commencing clinical duties at the Trust.”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Schedule feeding enterostomy procedures on weekdays to enable Nutritional Support Specialist Nurses to provide directed ward training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• These procedures are not urgent and are no longer undertaken on Fridays (or at weekends). This enables the Nutritional Support Specialist Nurses to provide specific and directed training to ward areas each time one of these patients is present.”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Define minimum safe medical staffing levels for each clinical area and doctor grade through a Medical Director-led workstream.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In contrast to nursing practice, there is no guidance as to what constitutes ‘safe staffing’ for doctors. This is an issue we are trying to address at Ashford and St Peter’s and the Medical Director is leading a work-stream which is attempting to define, for each clinical area and each grade of doctor, the safe minimal level of medical staffing.”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make enterostomy care plans available on the Trust intranet and in wards admitting patients with enterostomies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Care plans detailing the use of enterostomies and their complications are available on the Trust intranet via any workstation in the organisation and will be present in any ward where such a patient is an inpatient.”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide an additional doctor on the emergency medical take from 16:00 to 23:00 every day through adjusted junior-doctor rotas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We have recently adjusted the medical junior doctor rotas such that there is an extra doctor on the emergency medical take from 16:00 to 23:00 every day.”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commence the RIG care plan in radiology and send it with patients to the ward, including device-management and complication guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The RIG care plan is commenced in radiology when the device is inserted and accompanies the patient to the ward area. The care plan has full details of the management of these devices and the complications which may result from their insertion or use.”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove routine Medica-radiologist discussion or direct consultant involvement for specified urgent CT pathways, while retaining radiologist discussion for other out-of-hours scans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Scans for patients on the following pathways no longer require a discussion with the Medica radiologist”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide revised out-of-hours CT-requesting guidance in full and abbreviated forms on the intranet and through junior-doctor induction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• There is a revised guidance document available for doctors who request CT scanning out of hours (Mon – Fri 20:00 to 08:00 and Sat, Sun & Bank holidays 17:00 to 09:00).”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Current contractual restrictions limit the ability to roster doctors for elective work during premium time, constraining implementation of identified safe staffing levels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is likely the implementation of identified safe staffing levels for doctors will require the introduction of the new contracts for both junior doctors and consultants as at present there are significant restrictions on our ability to roster doctors to perform elective work within ‘premium time’ (19:00 to 07:00 weekdays and any time at weekends).”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Provide emergency care consistently across times of day and days of the week in line with the Keogh Standards by the end of 2016/17.

    Stated by Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 February 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide emergency care consistently across times of day and days of the week in line with the Keogh Standards by the end of 2016/17.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Trust is committed to the provision of emergency care which does not vary with time of day or day of week, as described in the Keogh Standards. The timescale for compliance with the 10 Keogh Standards is the end of 2016/17 (financial year).”

Source location

Clifford-CROFTS-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 22 February 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026