PFD report

Ethel Cross · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Nov 2013•Blackpool and the Fylde

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Unavailability of alarms for high-risk patients requiring monitoring during mobilisation
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable movement-alert systems for patients at high risk of fallsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable patient observation arrangements
  2. Presence of wheeled chairs in areas accessible to elderly patients at significant risk of falls
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of falls risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable stability controls for wheeled furniture in patient-care areas
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of alarms for high-risk patients requiring monitoring during mobilisation

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the evidence I heard that although at high risk of falls, and someone who would need one to one assistance from staff when mobilising, Ethel Cross was not provided with an alarm that in the event of her moving when staff are not nearby could alert members of the medical staff to such movement allowing the staff to attend to her. All such alarms on the ward were in use and such alarms are rarely not deployed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable movement-alert systems for patients at high risk of falls; Unreliable patient observation arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Presence of wheeled chairs in areas accessible to elderly patients at significant risk of falls

Wider context from the report

“During the Inquiry, I received evidence that chairs utilised by staff which have wheels attached to them had been present on ward 4 and that Ethel Cross had sat on one of these chairs which slipped and she suffered a fracture. I heard evidence that these chairs have been removed from two wards – including ward 4 - on which elderly patients at significant risk of falls may be cared for. I am concerned that such chairs may continue to be present on other wards within the Trust where such patients may have access to them and similar incidents may occur. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of falls risks; Unreliable stability controls for wheeled furniture in patient-care areas.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.