PFD report

Daniel Brendan Byrne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Dec 2015•Milton Keynes

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
20

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of healthcare staff to fully participate in suicide and self-harm risk assessment for new prisoners
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systemsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk
  2. Failure to identify or properly assess suicide and self-harm risk in newly arrived prisoners
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systemsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.13

  1. Action

    Develop and complete Trust-wide e-learning on assessing and managing self-harm and suicide risk for HMP Woodhill staff.

    Stated by Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 December 2015.
  2. Action

    Audit and continue monitoring record-keeping for staff attending ACCT reviews to ensure risk information is recorded and shared.

    Stated by Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 December 2015.
  3. Action

    Introduce a next-day secondary health screen for self-harm risk after the initial reception assessment.

    Stated by Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 December 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    NOMS holds policy responsibility for suicide prevention and self-harm management.

    Stated by Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of healthcare staff to fully participate in suicide and self-harm risk assessment for new prisoners

Wider context from the report

“In the Independent Investigation Report from the Prison and Probation Ombudsman, the author refers to previous deaths at Woodhill and says: “ Mr Byrne’s was the seventh self inflicted death at Woodhill since 2013 and there have been two since. We are concerned that many of the same issues have been repeated in a number of their investigations including this one. In six cases investigated in 2013 and 2014 we found that staff had failed to identify or properly assess the risk of suicide and self harm in newly arrived prisoners.” My concern is that during the evidence from the Nursing Staff, it appears that they did not participate fully in the health screen at reception of the first review of Mr Byrne’s ACCT. There needs to be a review of healthcare staff’s role in carrying out a full and adequate risk assessment of suicide and self-harm whenever a new prisoner is seen and assessed by healthcare. Consideration should also be given to the introduction of a formal risk assessment tool. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes; Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify or properly assess suicide and self-harm risk in newly arrived prisoners

Wider context from the report

“In the Independent Investigation Report from the Prison and Probation Ombudsman, the author refers to previous deaths at Woodhill and says: “ Mr Byrne’s was the seventh self inflicted death at Woodhill since 2013 and there have been two since. We are concerned that many of the same issues have been repeated in a number of their investigations including this one. In six cases investigated in 2013 and 2014 we found that staff had failed to identify or properly assess the risk of suicide and self harm in newly arrived prisoners.” My concern is that during the evidence from the Nursing Staff, it appears that they did not participate fully in the health screen at reception of the first review of Mr Byrne’s ACCT. There needs to be a review of healthcare staff’s role in carrying out a full and adequate risk assessment of suicide and self-harm whenever a new prisoner is seen and assessed by healthcare. Consideration should also be given to the introduction of a formal risk assessment tool. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and complete Trust-wide e-learning on assessing and managing self-harm and suicide risk for HMP Woodhill staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have gone further and in the last year CNWL has been developing a new on-line e-learning training package, developed by our mental health staff, which will better equip staff in assessing the risk of self-harm and suicide. We have been concerned to raise the awareness of all staff but particularly those undertaking reception screening about both the risk of suicide and appropriate risk management processes. This package has been trialled across the Trust’s Offender Care services and all CNWL staff in HMP Woodhill will have completed this training by the end of February 2016. Once its effectiveness has been audited, the tool will be shared with NOMS and NHS England for use in prison healthcare services outside of the Trust.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit and continue monitoring record-keeping for staff attending ACCT reviews to ensure risk information is recorded and shared.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We continue to work closely with NOMS, and all of the changes noted above have been discussed with them. We continue to provide support for ACCT training processes and support the prison in managing the prison-led ACCT process. CNWL staff actively check each day that relevant information has been appropriately shared and that we review ACCTs at each planned review meeting. We have audited our record keeping for staff attending ACCT reviews to ensure that risk related information is both appropriately recorded and shared. This monitoring will be on-going in HMP Woodhill and in our other services. We have discussed with the Prison Governor and the NOMS the use of ‘safer cells’ (where all ligature points have been removed) but we understand that there are no safer cells within HMP Woodhill at this time.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a next-day secondary health screen for self-harm risk after the initial reception assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From January 2016, CNWL has increased the number of experienced Mental Health trained nursing staff into the First Night Centre. The role of these staff is to support the system as a whole in assessing which of the men arriving within HMP Woodhill may pose a risk to themselves and ensuring that this risk is properly managed. NHS England has agreed additional funding for 2015-16 to increase staff capacity. In addition to the initial risk assessment on the first night, which includes a comprehensive risk assessment identifying self-harm and suicide indicators, there is now a secondary health screen carried out the next day that also screens for risks of self-harm. Further to this, a member of the Mental Health team is present at the First Night Centre (FNC) and carries out a risk assessment on all the men that arrived in the prison on the day before.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen the reception screening tool with detailed mental-health, self-harm and suicide-risk questions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While there is no nationally recognised best-practice ‘tool’ or best practice guidance, beyond the process identified in the PSIs identified above, the reception screening tool has been strengthened and more detailed questioning around mental health, risk of self-harm and suicide has been added. CNWL staff undertaking the reception screening role have been trained in its use, with all staff due to complete training by March 2016. Agency staff, where used, will also be fully trained.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train reception-screening staff, including agency staff where used, to apply the strengthened screening tool.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While there is no nationally recognised best-practice ‘tool’ or best practice guidance, beyond the process identified in the PSIs identified above, the reception screening tool has been strengthened and more detailed questioning around mental health, risk of self-harm and suicide has been added. CNWL staff undertaking the reception screening role have been trained in its use, with all staff due to complete training by March 2016. Agency staff, where used, will also be fully trained.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase experienced mental-health nursing capacity in the First Night Centre to support risk assessment and management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From January 2016, CNWL has increased the number of experienced Mental Health trained nursing staff into the First Night Centre. The role of these staff is to support the system as a whole in assessing which of the men arriving within HMP Woodhill may pose a risk to themselves and ensuring that this risk is properly managed. NHS England has agreed additional funding for 2015-16 to increase staff capacity. In addition to the initial risk assessment on the first night, which includes a comprehensive risk assessment identifying self-harm and suicide indicators, there is now a secondary health screen carried out the next day that also screens for risks of self-harm. Further to this, a member of the Mental Health team is present at the First Night Centre (FNC) and carries out a risk assessment on all the men that arrived in the prison on the day before.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Check daily information-sharing and review ACCT records at each planned review meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We continue to work closely with NOMS, and all of the changes noted above have been discussed with them. We continue to provide support for ACCT training processes and support the prison in managing the prison-led ACCT process. CNWL staff actively check each day that relevant information has been appropriately shared and that we review ACCTs at each planned review meeting. We have audited our record keeping for staff attending ACCT reviews to ensure that risk related information is both appropriately recorded and shared. This monitoring will be on-going in HMP Woodhill and in our other services. We have discussed with the Prison Governor and the NOMS the use of ‘safer cells’ (where all ligature points have been removed) but we understand that there are no safer cells within HMP Woodhill at this time.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide daily Mental Health team risk assessments for prisoners arriving at the First Night Centre.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From January 2016, CNWL has increased the number of experienced Mental Health trained nursing staff into the First Night Centre. The role of these staff is to support the system as a whole in assessing which of the men arriving within HMP Woodhill may pose a risk to themselves and ensuring that this risk is properly managed. NHS England has agreed additional funding for 2015-16 to increase staff capacity. In addition to the initial risk assessment on the first night, which includes a comprehensive risk assessment identifying self-harm and suicide indicators, there is now a secondary health screen carried out the next day that also screens for risks of self-harm. Further to this, a member of the Mental Health team is present at the First Night Centre (FNC) and carries out a risk assessment on all the men that arrived in the prison on the day before.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide ongoing support for prison ACCT training and prison-led ACCT management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We continue to work closely with NOMS, and all of the changes noted above have been discussed with them. We continue to provide support for ACCT training processes and support the prison in managing the prison-led ACCT process. CNWL staff actively check each day that relevant information has been appropriately shared and that we review ACCTs at each planned review meeting. We have audited our record keeping for staff attending ACCT reviews to ensure that risk related information is both appropriately recorded and shared. This monitoring will be on-going in HMP Woodhill and in our other services. We have discussed with the Prison Governor and the NOMS the use of ‘safer cells’ (where all ligature points have been removed) but we understand that there are no safer cells within HMP Woodhill at this time.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct an independent review of healthcare services, including mental health and substance misuse provision, alongside the safer custody review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to the recent deaths in custody at HMP Woodhill, reviews of all aspects of safer custody, and of healthcare services have been commissioned. These reviews are being conducted by staff who are not based in the prison, and the results will inform future developments.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response2
Page 1 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a comprehensive independent review of safer custody procedures and prison-wide factors affecting prisoner wellbeing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You have identified that the PPO has made repeat recommendations and that there is need for a comprehensive review of the safer custody procedures.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response2
Page 1 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain a dedicated mental health team member on the First Night Centre to interview new prisoners and update identified risk factors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. A dedicated mental health team member is now in place on the FNC Monday to Friday with plans to extend across weekends. All new prisoners will be interviewed by a member of this team. They will review the contents of the ECRA prior to prisoner interview and will also sign for the documents enclosed being present and having been read.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response2
Page 3 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the Entry to Custody Risk Assessment process through staged reception and first-night screening, including multi-agency review and incorporation into local policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You may be interested to know that in order to address the issues with reception screening that were identified in the case of Daniel Byrne a new tool is being introduced.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response2
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NOMS holds policy responsibility for suicide prevention and self-harm management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You stated that “there needs to be a review of the healthcare staff’s role in carrying out a full and adequate risk assessment of suicide and self-harm whenever a new prisoner is seen and assessed by healthcare”. In addition, that “consideration should be given to the introduction of a formal risk assessment tool”. We note that you raised similar concerns in Regulation 28 reports in 2014 and have considered the NOMS responses of 12 June and 31 October 2014. We note that the Equality, Rights and Decency Group of NOMS has policy responsibility for suicide prevention and self-harm management and will not repeat the description of the policy frameworks set out in the responses. We do however operate under the national frameworks set out in Prison Service Instructions (PSI) 74/2011 Early Days in”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The prison leads the ACCT process and is responsible for regularly assessing prisoners’ risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It was also recognised that whilst those with complex Mental Health needs are ‘managed well’ there is very little resource available for those inmates who are primarily being supported by GPs. This will be picked up in the benchmarking exercise. There were a number of other recommendations including the need to regularly review and focus on the ACCT process recognising the importance of the prison risk assessing regularly and the quality and organisation of the process.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No nationally recognised best-practice risk-assessment tool exists beyond the processes specified in Prison Service Instructions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While there is no nationally recognised best-practice ‘tool’ or best practice guidance, beyond the process identified in the PSIs identified above, the reception screening tool has been strengthened and more detailed questioning around mental health, risk of self-harm and suicide has been added. CNWL staff undertaking the reception screening role have been trained in its use, with all staff due to complete training by March 2016. Agency staff, where used, will also be fully trained.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Bring specialist expertise from other prison services into HMP Woodhill to support safety improvements.

    Stated by Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 December 2015.
  2. 2

    Amend the Mental Health referral process, including electronic referral alerts and weekly multidisciplinary review.

    Stated by Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 December 2015.
  3. 3

    Increase the Mental Health team to four Care Co-ordinators.

    Stated by Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 December 2015.
  4. 4

    Complete an independent review of healthcare provision and recent custody deaths at HMP Woodhill.

    Stated by Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 December 2015.
  5. 5

    Communicate review findings to relevant service providers and consult with them to agree approaches for remedying weaknesses and improving services.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 December 2015.
  6. 6

    Implement the Record, Respond and Reduce violence-reduction initiative as a performance measure.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 December 2015.
  7. 7

    Provide the coroner with updates on future developments resulting from the reviews.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 December 2015.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    Completion of the Mental Health Assessment Unit depends on NHS England approving funding.

    Stated by Central and North West London NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  2. 2

    The healthcare provider is responsible for undertaking the review of healthcare services.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Bring specialist expertise from other prison services into HMP Woodhill to support safety improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“CNWL provides healthcare in a number of prisons because we have a passion for equivalence of care for those detained. Our motto is “caring not judging”. I tell you this only to stress that we are deeply committed to understanding and addressing any issues to improve safety for those in our care. We are open to, and have actively sought external support, have brought expertise in from our other prisons to HMP Woodhill, are ensuring that resource is available as required, to keep the men safe and we are working with Governor and the prison regime to drive improvements.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the Mental Health referral process, including electronic referral alerts and weekly multidisciplinary review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have significantly amended the process of referral to the Mental Health team. The Mental Health team is also now substantially increased and has four Care Co-ordinators compared to one at the time of Mr Byrne’s death. A template has been introduced into the electronic clinical records system alerting the Mental Health team to a new referral. All referrals are now reviewed weekly by the Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist and the multi-disciplinary team.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase the Mental Health team to four Care Co-ordinators.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have significantly amended the process of referral to the Mental Health team. The Mental Health team is also now substantially increased and has four Care Co-ordinators compared to one at the time of Mr Byrne’s death. A template has been introduced into the electronic clinical records system alerting the Mental Health team to a new referral. All referrals are now reviewed weekly by the Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist and the multi-disciplinary team.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete an independent review of healthcare provision and recent custody deaths at HMP Woodhill.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I must say at the outset of my response, that the number of self-inflicted deaths within HMP Woodhill since July 2013 is both tragic and of deep concern. We are clear that, in conjunction with NOMS, we can and must do more to ensure that no further, preventable, deaths occur. Since 2013, when CNWL started providing healthcare at HMP Woodhill, we have worked hard with NOMS to enhance the safety of the men for whom we care. In view of our own concerns about the number of deaths, we had pro-actively approached NHS England commissioners to conduct a fully independent review of healthcare provided by CNWL in the prison. We extended and formalised this request after the death of Mr Byrne in 2015. This review has now been completed and will formally report back at the end of March.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate review findings to relevant service providers and consult with them to agree approaches for remedying weaknesses and improving services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Any findings will be communicated to the relevant service provider, and consultation will take place in order to agree an approach to remedy any weaknesses and improve services.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response2
Page 1 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the Record, Respond and Reduce violence-reduction initiative as a performance measure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“▪ Violence Reduction – Record, Respond and Reduce (a new initiative that has been introduced to tackle violence which is now a performance measure)”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response2
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide the coroner with updates on future developments resulting from the reviews.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HM Coroner will be provided with updates on all future developments resulting from the review.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response2
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Completion of the Mental Health Assessment Unit depends on NHS England approving funding.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The newly-built Mental Health Assessment Unit is due for completion, subject to NHS England funding approval, in March 2016 (NHS England are considering the business case at present). CNWL proposed the building and staffing of this unit to NHS England health commissioners in July 2015, which would provide fourteen beds”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The healthcare provider is responsible for undertaking the review of healthcare services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A review by a team of NOMS staff will focus on all areas within the prison and the work of partner agencies which have an impact on the wellbeing of prisoners. The healthcare provider, Central North West London Trust, will undertake a review of healthcare services in conjunction with this, and the findings of the two reviews will be brought together into one final report.”

Source location

Daniel-Byrne-Response2
Page 1 · response
Published 14 December 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026