PFD report

Marian DAY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Sep 2020•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to record a clear anticoagulant prescription plan for all staff to follow
  2. Multiple charts and documents permitting muddled or omitted anticoagulant prescribing
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe anticoagulant management
  3. Lack of senior review of patients for anticoagulant management
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient carePart of recurring concern: Unsafe anticoagulant management
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Audit compliance with documentation requirements for the immediate warfarin safety actions.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 November 2020.
  2. Action

    Require senior-doctor discussion and full documentation before changing an existing warfarin plan.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 November 2020.
  3. Action

    Disseminate guidance reminding staff to amend both charts when withholding warfarin doses.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 November 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The expert panel concluded that changing the entire warfarin prescription process would be unlikely to prevent future deaths and could increase prescribing errors.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record a clear anticoagulant prescription plan for all staff to follow

Wider context from the report

“Whilst there has been a detailed Serious Incident review of the circumstances of Mrs Day’s death conducted by the Trust, it remains unclear as to how and why these prescription errors occurred. It is my view that a similar prescription error could occur again, as there remains a number of different charts and documents that allow for muddled prescribing of, or omission of, anticoagulants, when there are complex medical conditions and concern re likely bleeding. Whilst the development of an electronic prescribing system may increase the probability of more clarity in prescription of anticoagulants, this is not in place currently. In addition, this alone in my view will not ensure oversight of anticoagulant management, unless other measures are taken to ensure senior review of patients, and a clear prescription plan recorded for all staff to follow. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Multiple charts and documents permitting muddled or omitted anticoagulant prescribing

Wider context from the report

“Whilst there has been a detailed Serious Incident review of the circumstances of Mrs Day’s death conducted by the Trust, it remains unclear as to how and why these prescription errors occurred. It is my view that a similar prescription error could occur again, as there remains a number of different charts and documents that allow for muddled prescribing of, or omission of, anticoagulants, when there are complex medical conditions and concern re likely bleeding. Whilst the development of an electronic prescribing system may increase the probability of more clarity in prescription of anticoagulants, this is not in place currently. In addition, this alone in my view will not ensure oversight of anticoagulant management, unless other measures are taken to ensure senior review of patients, and a clear prescription plan recorded for all staff to follow. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe anticoagulant management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of senior review of patients for anticoagulant management

Wider context from the report

“Whilst there has been a detailed Serious Incident review of the circumstances of Mrs Day’s death conducted by the Trust, it remains unclear as to how and why these prescription errors occurred. It is my view that a similar prescription error could occur again, as there remains a number of different charts and documents that allow for muddled prescribing of, or omission of, anticoagulants, when there are complex medical conditions and concern re likely bleeding. Whilst the development of an electronic prescribing system may increase the probability of more clarity in prescription of anticoagulants, this is not in place currently. In addition, this alone in my view will not ensure oversight of anticoagulant management, unless other measures are taken to ensure senior review of patients, and a clear prescription plan recorded for all staff to follow. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care; Unsafe anticoagulant management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit compliance with documentation requirements for the immediate warfarin safety actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. Pharmacy to audit documentation compliance for the immediate further actions described above. December 2020 Assistant Chief Pharmacist and Medication Safety Officer to Conduct”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 4 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require senior-doctor discussion and full documentation before changing an existing warfarin plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Changes to existing warfarin plans to be made only following discussion with senior doctors, and fully documented.”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 3 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate guidance reminding staff to amend both charts when withholding warfarin doses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. Further Education and Awareness:”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 4 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Document decisions to change existing warfarin plans on the yellow dosing chart and in the clinical record when made.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Decisions on changes to existing warfarin plans to be documented on the yellow dosing chart at the time they are made, as well as in the clinical record. This will ensure that all doctors dosing warfarin are aware of the current plan even if they are not part of the treating team.”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 3 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore electronic Nervecentre alerts to inform ward doctors when INR results become available.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Advancement of laboratory technology including electronic results makes most results available earlier in the day. Dosing before the parent team finish their shift is ideal as they will know their patients’ needs. To achieve this we are working towards:”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 4 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include the patient story in junior-doctor training on warfarin prescribing errors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Add this patient story into training for juniors to highlight the potential outcome of warfarin prescribing errors: Training updated November 2020 for inclusion in August 2021 junior doctor induction and going forwards.”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 4 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a multidisciplinary review of the warfarin prescribing, dosing and supporting-documentation process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am responding to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths, issued following the inquest touching the death of Mrs Marian Day. You raised concern about prescription errors that led to Mrs Day receiving two doses of warfarin on consecutive days despite there being a medical plan that it should be withheld. You were concerned that a similar error may occur again in part due to the number of charts involved in the prescribing and dosing of warfarin. In order to address your concerns we have undertaken a multidisciplinary (MDT) review of our warfarin process, prescription and supporting documentation to address these concerns.”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 1 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider adding prompts to warfarin documentation addressing thrombosis and bleeding risks during prescribing decisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Consideration of the benefits of prompts in the warfarin documentation with regard to the risks for thrombosis versus the risks of bleeding to aide prescribing decision making. For discussion at Medicine Safety Group December 2020 [Assistant Chief Pharmacist and Medication Safety Officer to Present]”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 4 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The expert panel concluded that changing the entire warfarin prescription process would be unlikely to prevent future deaths and could increase prescribing errors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“changing the entire process by altering the prescription charts. The differing expertise outlined that if this was conducted then there would be an increased likelihood in prescribing and dosing errors affecting patients. Therefore it was concluded by this expert panel that this would be highly unlikely not to help prevent future deaths. In addition the roll out of EPMA (electronic prescribing) at SFHFT, which includes warfarin prescribing, is expected to pilot in February 2021 and realistically any changes to paper documentation would be highly unlikely to complete Trust governance processes and printing before this time.”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 5 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Paper documentation changes could not realistically complete governance and printing processes before electronic prescribing was piloted.

Verbatim wording from the response

“changing the entire process by altering the prescription charts. The differing expertise outlined that if this was conducted then there would be an increased likelihood in prescribing and dosing errors affecting patients. Therefore it was concluded by this expert panel that this would be highly unlikely not to help prevent future deaths. In addition the roll out of EPMA (electronic prescribing) at SFHFT, which includes warfarin prescribing, is expected to pilot in February 2021 and realistically any changes to paper documentation would be highly unlikely to complete Trust governance processes and printing before this time.”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 5 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Facilitate parent medical teams dosing warfarin before leaving the ward, using nursing prompts once INR results are available.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 November 2020.
  2. 2

    Include the patient story in nurse training on warfarin administration errors.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStatus unclearThe respondent did not make the status of this action clear when they made their response on 30 November 2020.
  3. 3

    Deliver a Trust-wide communication programme raising awareness of warfarin prescribing and administration risks.

    Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 November 2020.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Facilitate parent medical teams dosing warfarin before leaving the ward, using nursing prompts once INR results are available.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Steps to facilitate the parent medical team to dose warfarin whenever possible. Warfarin has traditionally been dosed and administered around 18.00 as it required the results of INR blood tests taken earlier that day.”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 3 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include the patient story in nurse training on warfarin administration errors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Add this patient story into training for nurses to highlight the potential outcome of warfarin administration errors.”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 4 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver a Trust-wide communication programme raising awareness of warfarin prescribing and administration risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Communication programme across the Trust to raise awareness. December 2020.”

Source location

2020-0199-Response-from-Kings-Mill-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
Page 4 · response
Published 30 November 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026