PFD report

César Cuauhtémoc González Barrón · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Oct 2019•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
12

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised12

  1. Failure to ensure first aider knowledge of ambulance-summoning arrangements
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to emergency communicationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency arrangements for organised public eventsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangements
  2. Failure to provide ambulance crews with correct venue access directions
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure timely ambulance access to care and emergency treatment premisesPart of recurring concern: Unsafe emergency call handling
  3. Lack of designated monitoring of performers’ wellbeing and consciousness
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably monitor participants during organised sporting activities
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure first aider knowledge of ambulance-summoning arrangements

Wider context from the report

“2. The first aider covering the Lucha Libre event had never worked at the Roundhouse before that day, but she did not seek and was not offered any sort of briefing by the Roundhouse staff either before she began her shift or at any time during it. She did not appreciate that there would be non native English (mostly Spanish) speakers working on the event, which might raise language barriers in an emergency. She did not know who the staff were, how to identify them or where they would be positioned. She did not know the procedure for summoning assistance. She did not know the protocol for ringing an ambulance. She did not know who should do this or how she could ensure that it was done. She did not know that the ambulance should be directed to the rear of the building. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to emergency communication; Unreliable emergency arrangements for organised public events; Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide ambulance crews with correct venue access directions

Wider context from the report

“3. In the event, the instructions given to the London Ambulance Service did not include the direction to drive round to the rear entrance and so valuable minutes were lost as the paramedics made their way from front to rear on foot outside the building. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure timely ambulance access to care and emergency treatment premises; Unsafe emergency call handling.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of designated monitoring of performers’ wellbeing and consciousness

Wider context from the report

“1. When Mr González Barrón lost consciousness, there was a delay before it was recognised that this was not part of the performance. He was 51 years old and undergoing very vigorous exertion, but there was nobody at the wrestling match tasked specifically with ensuring that he was well and that, for example, he had not lost consciousness. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably monitor participants during organised sporting activities.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate the nature of an emergency when summoning first aiders

Wider context from the report

“4. When the first aider was summoned urgently, the member of staff who had alerted her said that she was needed for a performer, but did not tell her what had happened. She had no understanding of the nature of the emergency. The member of staff did not wait for her. He did not offer to help carry her equipment. She tried to follow him but did not know where she was going. The first aider did not take the defibrillator with her when she first went to the ring, she said in court because she was not expecting a cardiac arrest. There was a second defibrillator in the venue, but she did not know where it was, she did not ask for it and nobody brought it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective communication during medical emergencies; Unreliable emergency arrangements for organised public events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to guide and assist first aiders responding to emergencies

Wider context from the report

“4. When the first aider was summoned urgently, the member of staff who had alerted her said that she was needed for a performer, but did not tell her what had happened. She had no understanding of the nature of the emergency. The member of staff did not wait for her. He did not offer to help carry her equipment. She tried to follow him but did not know where she was going. The first aider did not take the defibrillator with her when she first went to the ring, she said in court because she was not expecting a cardiac arrest. There was a second defibrillator in the venue, but she did not know where it was, she did not ask for it and nobody brought it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency arrangements for organised public events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure first aider identification of venue staff during emergencies

Wider context from the report

“6. When Mr González Barrón collapsed, the scene was chaotic. No person took charge. There were lots of people in the ring, but the first aider was unable to identify which, if any, were staff, so that she could ask them for assistance, for example, in retrieving her equipment. She was distracted by the noise and comment of those around. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency arrangements for organised public events; Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to initiate CPR when cardiac arrest is identified

Wider context from the report

“5. When the first aider arrived at Mr González Barrón's side, she cut off his face mask. Though she was told immediately by someone she thought to be a doctor that Mr González Barrón was not breathing and had no pulse, she did not start cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). She did hand over her pocket mask and oropharyngeal airways, and she did go to retrieve emergency equipment from the first aid room 15-20 seconds away, but she could not remember in court if she fetched the defibrillator on her first or second return to the first aid room. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide a competent handover to ambulance services

Wider context from the report

“8. The handover to LAS was confused, with mixed messages as to whether the automated external defibrillator had delivered a shock or not. No person took charge of a competent handover to LAS. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of ambulance information systems to transfer safety-critical clinical and operational information; Ineffective communication during medical emergencies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure timely availability of a defibrillator at the emergency location

Wider context from the report

“4. When the first aider was summoned urgently, the member of staff who had alerted her said that she was needed for a performer, but did not tell her what had happened. She had no understanding of the nature of the emergency. The member of staff did not wait for her. He did not offer to help carry her equipment. She tried to follow him but did not know where she was going. The first aider did not take the defibrillator with her when she first went to the ring, she said in court because she was not expecting a cardiac arrest. There was a second defibrillator in the venue, but she did not know where it was, she did not ask for it and nobody brought it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable availability and readiness of defibrillators for emergency response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to brief first aiders on venue emergency arrangements

Wider context from the report

“2. The first aider covering the Lucha Libre event had never worked at the Roundhouse before that day, but she did not seek and was not offered any sort of briefing by the Roundhouse staff either before she began her shift or at any time during it. She did not appreciate that there would be non native English (mostly Spanish) speakers working on the event, which might raise language barriers in an emergency. She did not know who the staff were, how to identify them or where they would be positioned. She did not know the procedure for summoning assistance. She did not know the protocol for ringing an ambulance. She did not know who should do this or how she could ensure that it was done. She did not know that the ambulance should be directed to the rear of the building. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable emergency arrangements for organised public events.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of incident command during emergency response

Wider context from the report

“6. When Mr González Barrón collapsed, the scene was chaotic. No person took charge. There were lots of people in the ring, but the first aider was unable to identify which, if any, were staff, so that she could ask them for assistance, for example, in retrieving her equipment. She was distracted by the noise and comment of those around. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency response leadership and coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ineffective delivery of chest compressions

Wider context from the report

“7. The chest compressions in progress when the London Ambulance Service (LAS) arrived were ineffective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.