PFD report

Mr Charles Knapp · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Jun 2019•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Failure to maintain complete identifying and contact information for responsible carers
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete and unreliable information about carers and care arrangements
  2. Provision of inadequate care to patients
  3. Failure to provide two carers when required for patient care and movement
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain complete identifying and contact information for responsible carers

Wider context from the report

“(iv) Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd failed to supply the court with the full name and contact details of the main carer who was responsible for Mr Knapp’s care and as such the court did not have the benefit of hearing from her. Further, her surname had been redacted from the records which were left at Mr Knapp’s house. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete and unreliable information about carers and care arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provision of inadequate care to patients

Wider context from the report

“The Coroner understands that although Angel Solutions (UK) has now been rated as inadequate following an inspection carried out by the Care Quality Commission in March 2019, it continues to provide care to approximately 8 individuals. The Coroner is concerned that there is a risk that the company will provide inadequate care to those individuals and keep inadequate patient records in respect of them, which gives rise to the risk of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide two carers when required for patient care and movement

Wider context from the report

“(ii) Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd did not always provide Mr Knapp with two carers, despite his care plan requiring two carers to be present in order to move him and otherwise effectively care for him. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain patients’ personal hygiene

Wider context from the report

“(i) Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd omitted to maintain Mr Knapp’s personal hygiene or regularly reposition him, and thereafter omitted to seek medical attention for the pressure sores. These omissions contributed to the development of the pressure sores and to Mr Knapp’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to keep adequate patient records

Wider context from the report

“The Coroner understands that although Angel Solutions (UK) has now been rated as inadequate following an inspection carried out by the Care Quality Commission in March 2019, it continues to provide care to approximately 8 individuals. The Coroner is concerned that there is a risk that the company will provide inadequate care to those individuals and keep inadequate patient records in respect of them, which gives rise to the risk of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to seek medical attention for patients’ pressure sores

Wider context from the report

“(i) Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd omitted to maintain Mr Knapp’s personal hygiene or regularly reposition him, and thereafter omitted to seek medical attention for the pressure sores. These omissions contributed to the development of the pressure sores and to Mr Knapp’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to seek medical attention when a person's condition warrants it; Inadequate management of pressure ulcers; Unreliable escalation by care staff for required medical attention.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to regularly reposition patients

Wider context from the report

“(i) Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd omitted to maintain Mr Knapp’s personal hygiene or regularly reposition him, and thereafter omitted to seek medical attention for the pressure sores. These omissions contributed to the development of the pressure sores and to Mr Knapp’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably reposition patients at required intervals.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain and provide complete patient records

Wider context from the report

“(iii) Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd failed to provide the court with a full set of Mr Knapp’s records, and as such the court did not have the opportunity to review the records for the key period prior to the development of the pressure sores. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.