PFD report

JILL FELICITY SINSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Aug 2013•West Yorkshire (East)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to review relevant computerised medical records during clinical consultation
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions
  2. Failure to consider and act on Consultant Psychiatrist correspondence
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable review and action on clinically significant incoming correspondence
  3. Failure to arrange necessary General Practitioner review or Consultant Psychiatrist referral
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior cliniciansPart of recurring concern: Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review relevant computerised medical records during clinical consultation

Wider context from the report

“(2) When the Deceased was seen at the GP surgery by a Staff Nurse on the 3rd July 2012 – (a) the Deceased’s presentation on that occasion was such as to necessitate a review by a GP and/or referral to the Deceased’s Consultant Psychiatrist, but no such review and/or referral was considered, and (b) due regard was not paid to the Deceased’s computerised medical records prior to and/or in the course of consulting with the Deceased on that occasion, as information provided by the Deceased to the said Staff Nurse was fundamentally incorrect which was apparent from earlier entries in the Deceased’s said records ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider and act on Consultant Psychiatrist correspondence

Wider context from the report

“(4) Upon receipt of correspondence from the Deceased’s Consultant Psychiatrist, due regard was not paid to the contents thereof and appropriate action was not taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable review and action on clinically significant incoming correspondence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to arrange necessary General Practitioner review or Consultant Psychiatrist referral

Wider context from the report

“(2) When the Deceased was seen at the GP surgery by a Staff Nurse on the 3rd July 2012 – (a) the Deceased’s presentation on that occasion was such as to necessitate a review by a GP and/or referral to the Deceased’s Consultant Psychiatrist, but no such review and/or referral was considered, and (b) due regard was not paid to the Deceased’s computerised medical records prior to and/or in the course of consulting with the Deceased on that occasion, as information provided by the Deceased to the said Staff Nurse was fundamentally incorrect which was apparent from earlier entries in the Deceased’s said records ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate significant clinical concerns to appropriately senior clinicians; Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to account for self-harm and suicidal tendencies when supplying unsupervised medication

Wider context from the report

“(3) The Deceased was prescribed a significant quantity of medication on a monthly basis, such medication being given in possession and unsupervised, without due consideration for the Deceased’s medical history of self-harm and suicidal tendencies, which history was recorded on the Deceased’s computerised medical records. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks; Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide regular General Practitioner monitoring

Wider context from the report

“(1) The Deceased’s General Practitioner did not ensure the Deceased was monitored regularly, or at all, by a General Practitioner but preferred to rely upon the care she received from the CMHT. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.