PFD report

Jason O’Rourke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Feb 2021•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure of the prisoner arrival form to sufficiently highlight self-harm and suicide risk to wing staff
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systemsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable sharing of safety-critical risk information within prisons
  2. Lack of robust management audit of nightly roll checks
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of care and safety auditing to identify deficienciesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable prison roll-check procedures
  3. Failure of the prisoner arrival form to provide a clear self-harm and suicide risk assessment and response pathway
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systemsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Visit Belmarsh to identify further roll-check improvements and test compliance with the new process and Local Security Strategy.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 February 2021.
  2. Action

    Require a discipline officer to remain on the wing until each night OSG roll check is completed, recorded, signed and reported, with spot checks of compliance.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 February 2021.
  3. Action

    Review the quality-assurance processes for roll checks with the LTHSE safety team.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 February 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Routine CCTV monitoring cannot be used to assure roll checks because CCTV is authorised only for specified safety, security or investigative circumstances.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the prisoner arrival form to sufficiently highlight self-harm and suicide risk to wing staff

Wider context from the report

“(1) The ‘immediate needs’ form completed for prisoners on arrival at HMP Belmarsh does not facilitate a clear assessment of any risk of self-harm or suicide and the actions to be taken if such a risk is identified. The form poses a question: “Is there any specific concerns re self-harm or suicide?” and then gives the guidance “if yes, amend care plan”. However, this guidance is only effective for those prisoners who already have a care plan, meaning those who are already on an Open Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (‘ACCT’) plan. The action to be taken for those prisoners where specific concerns regarding self-harm or suicide are identified, but who do not already have a care plan, is unclear from the form. It is also unclear how the above question interacts with further questions below it which address any past ACCTs/F2052SHs, the level of support available to the prisoner and the answer the prisoner gives to the question “Do you feel suicidal now?” Accordingly, this form does not sufficiently highlight prisoners who are in fact suicidal, or where there are concerns about their risk of self-harm or suicidal, to those on the wing. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable sharing of safety-critical risk information within prisons.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of robust management audit of nightly roll checks

Wider context from the report

“(2) The nightly roll checks at HMP Belmarsh are due to be carried out by a single member of Operational Support Grade (OSG) staff at 9.00 pm and 6.00 am. Their stated purpose is to check for escape or death among the prisoners. On handing over to the morning staff, the OSG signs paperwork indicating that the roll checks have been completed. There is no robust system by which the prison management audit this process. This means that the prison management can be under the impression that the checks have been carried out, when they have not been, as occurred here. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of care and safety auditing to identify deficiencies; Unreliable prison roll-check procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the prisoner arrival form to provide a clear self-harm and suicide risk assessment and response pathway

Wider context from the report

“(1) The ‘immediate needs’ form completed for prisoners on arrival at HMP Belmarsh does not facilitate a clear assessment of any risk of self-harm or suicide and the actions to be taken if such a risk is identified. The form poses a question: “Is there any specific concerns re self-harm or suicide?” and then gives the guidance “if yes, amend care plan”. However, this guidance is only effective for those prisoners who already have a care plan, meaning those who are already on an Open Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (‘ACCT’) plan. The action to be taken for those prisoners where specific concerns regarding self-harm or suicide are identified, but who do not already have a care plan, is unclear from the form. It is also unclear how the above question interacts with further questions below it which address any past ACCTs/F2052SHs, the level of support available to the prisoner and the answer the prisoner gives to the question “Do you feel suicidal now?” Accordingly, this form does not sufficiently highlight prisoners who are in fact suicidal, or where there are concerns about their risk of self-harm or suicidal, to those on the wing. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective prison suicide and self-harm prevention systems; Unreliable assessment of suicide and self-harm risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Visit Belmarsh to identify further roll-check improvements and test compliance with the new process and Local Security Strategy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the light of the concerns that you have expressed, the Governor of HMP Belmarsh is working with the Long Term and High Security Estate (LTHSE) safety team to review the quality assurance processes in place for roll checks. As a first step, a system has been implemented whereby when a night OSG arrives a discipline officer remains on the wing until a full roll check has been completed, recorded and signed for on the wing and reported to the Orderly Officer. Spot checks are in place to ensure that the process is being followed. The LTHSE safety team will be visiting Belmarsh to identify further opportunities for improvement and to test compliance with this new process, and the LSS more generally.”

Source location

2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 15 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require a discipline officer to remain on the wing until each night OSG roll check is completed, recorded, signed and reported, with spot checks of compliance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the light of the concerns that you have expressed, the Governor of HMP Belmarsh is working with the Long Term and High Security Estate (LTHSE) safety team to review the quality assurance processes in place for roll checks. As a first step, a system has been implemented whereby when a night OSG arrives a discipline officer remains on the wing until a full roll check has been completed, recorded and signed for on the wing and reported to the Orderly Officer. Spot checks are in place to ensure that the process is being followed. The LTHSE safety team will be visiting Belmarsh to identify further opportunities for improvement and to test compliance with this new process, and the LSS more generally.”

Source location

2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 15 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the quality-assurance processes for roll checks with the LTHSE safety team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the light of the concerns that you have expressed, the Governor of HMP Belmarsh is working with the Long Term and High Security Estate (LTHSE) safety team to review the quality assurance processes in place for roll checks. As a first step, a system has been implemented whereby when a night OSG arrives a discipline officer remains on the wing until a full roll check has been completed, recorded and signed for on the wing and reported to the Orderly Officer. Spot checks are in place to ensure that the process is being followed. The LTHSE safety team will be visiting Belmarsh to identify further opportunities for improvement and to test compliance with this new process, and the LSS more generally.”

Source location

2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 15 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a revised immediate-needs form with clearer guidance for identifying, communicating and documenting suicide or self-harm risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following evidence heard at the inquest you have raised concerns in relation to the ‘immediate needs’ form completed for prisoners on arrival at HMP Belmarsh. This is a locally produced document created in line with the Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 07/2015 Early days in Custody. You will be aware that the early days in custody is a period in which risk of self-harm or suicide is heightened and the wellbeing of prisoners in our care is the primary concern of staff throughout the reception and first night process. Following the inquest a review of the form has taken place, and a new version is now in use.”

Source location

2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 15 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Routine CCTV monitoring cannot be used to assure roll checks because CCTV is authorised only for specified safety, security or investigative circumstances.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that the question of using CCTV for assurance was explored at the inquest. CCTV is deployed in prisons for reasons of safety and security and not for general surveillance or monitoring staff performance. Playback of CCTV coverage is only authorised in certain circumstances, such as where there is reason to believe that safety or security has been compromised, or to assist with a formal investigation. Where there is suspicion that roll checks are not being carried out, CCTV could be used as part of an investigation into those suspicions, but it cannot routinely be monitored as part of the assurance process. Staff are aware that CCTV is in use around the establishment and that their actions may be scrutinised following an incident such as a death in custody.”

Source location

2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 15 February 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026