Hayden Meirion NORTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Apr 2015•Exeter and Greater Devon

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Unavailability of an emergency code protocol for calling an ambulance
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to call an ambulance promptly when emergency assistance is requiredPart of recurring concern: Unreliable access to emergency communicationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable emergency access to hospital care
  2. Lack of recorded blood-pressure monitoring
  3. Failure to inform inmates about screening for aortic aneurysm
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate detection and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust

    Promote national screening programmes through monthly health-promotion sessions and prison-wide posters.

  2. Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust

    Conduct a further audit of hypertension-monitoring compliance in July 2015.

  3. Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust

    Provide and track access to abdominal aortic aneurysm screening for eligible Devon prison patients, documenting screening offers, attendance or declining reasons.

  4. Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust

    Complete a baseline review of compliance with NICE hypertension standards for monitoring and recording prisoners’ blood pressure.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust

    Responsibility for establishing the prison’s emergency medical response code protocol rests with the Prison Service, specifically HMP Dartmoor’s Governor.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of an emergency code protocol for calling an ambulance

Wider context from the report

“The Deceased was medically assessed whilst an inmate of HMP Albany (now part of HMP Isle of Wight) on 28 September 2006 and known to have extensive and well documented history of high cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease with episodic angina, two previous myocardial infarctions, blood pressure 220/100. But after arrival at HMP Dartmoor on 15 March 2013, (1) there was no record that his blood pressure was monitored; or (2) that he had been informed of a screening test for aortic aneurysm. He died on 6th January 2014 from a ruptured aortic aneurysm at HMP Dartmoor. (3) There was a delay in calling an emergency ambulance because HMP Dartmoor did not have an emergency code (unlike HMP Exeter) protocol. There was insufficient evidence to say the above were causative of Mr NORTON’s death but there would have been an awareness of possible problems to come. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to call an ambulance promptly when emergency assistance is required; Unreliable access to emergency communication; Unreliable emergency access to hospital care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of recorded blood-pressure monitoring

Wider context from the report

“The Deceased was medically assessed whilst an inmate of HMP Albany (now part of HMP Isle of Wight) on 28 September 2006 and known to have extensive and well documented history of high cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease with episodic angina, two previous myocardial infarctions, blood pressure 220/100. But after arrival at HMP Dartmoor on 15 March 2013, (1) there was no record that his blood pressure was monitored; or (2) that he had been informed of a screening test for aortic aneurysm. He died on 6th January 2014 from a ruptured aortic aneurysm at HMP Dartmoor. (3) There was a delay in calling an emergency ambulance because HMP Dartmoor did not have an emergency code (unlike HMP Exeter) protocol. There was insufficient evidence to say the above were causative of Mr NORTON’s death but there would have been an awareness of possible problems to come. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform inmates about screening for aortic aneurysm

Wider context from the report

“The Deceased was medically assessed whilst an inmate of HMP Albany (now part of HMP Isle of Wight) on 28 September 2006 and known to have extensive and well documented history of high cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease with episodic angina, two previous myocardial infarctions, blood pressure 220/100. But after arrival at HMP Dartmoor on 15 March 2013, (1) there was no record that his blood pressure was monitored; or (2) that he had been informed of a screening test for aortic aneurysm. He died on 6th January 2014 from a ruptured aortic aneurysm at HMP Dartmoor. (3) There was a delay in calling an emergency ambulance because HMP Dartmoor did not have an emergency code (unlike HMP Exeter) protocol. There was insufficient evidence to say the above were causative of Mr NORTON’s death but there would have been an awareness of possible problems to come. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate detection and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Promote national screening programmes through monthly health-promotion sessions and prison-wide posters.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5.5.3. The AAA screening is actively promoted in the prison, as noted in recent audit where of the 29 patients who attended for AAA screening, 18 were self-referrals. (See appendix 5)”

Source location

2015-0137-Response-by-Dorset-Health-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 13 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a further audit of hypertension-monitoring compliance in July 2015.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5.4.1. National guidelines (NICE) are in place in the Prison healthcare service and form part of the Trusts prison healthcare clinical audit programme. In line with the PPO action plan following the death of Mr Norton, GP Clinical Lead Dr ████████ undertook a baseline review of compliance against NICE QS28 Hypertension to ensure compliance. This is provided at Appendix 3 and at point of audit the Trust was fully compliant. A further audit is planned for July 2015 to ensure ongoing monitoring and compliance.”

Source location

2015-0137-Response-by-Dorset-Health-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 13 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide and track access to abdominal aortic aneurysm screening for eligible Devon prison patients, documenting screening offers, attendance or declining reasons.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5.5.1. The Trust now provides a AAA screening programme, which is available to all patients within the Devon prisons. Eligible patients (as defined by the National AAA Screening programme) are tracked to ensure all are offered and receive screening, or reasons for declining are clearly documented.”

Source location

2015-0137-Response-by-Dorset-Health-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 13 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a baseline review of compliance with NICE hypertension standards for monitoring and recording prisoners’ blood pressure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5.4.1. National guidelines (NICE) are in place in the Prison healthcare service and form part of the Trusts prison healthcare clinical audit programme. In line with the PPO action plan following the death of Mr Norton, GP Clinical Lead Dr ████████ undertook a baseline review of compliance against NICE QS28 Hypertension to ensure compliance. This is provided at Appendix 3 and at point of audit the Trust was fully compliant. A further audit is planned for July 2015 to ensure ongoing monitoring and compliance.”

Source location

2015-0137-Response-by-Dorset-Health-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 13 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for establishing the prison’s emergency medical response code protocol rests with the Prison Service, specifically HMP Dartmoor’s Governor.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3.3. The third of the concerns relates to the HMP Dartmoor service, at the time of this report it is not clear whether the prison have been asked to respond separately or whether the Trust is expected to do so on their behalf. The Trust is awaiting a response from HM Coroner’s office to determine this. For the purposes of this report the third recommendation has been left for HMP Dartmoor Governing Governor Bridie Oaks-Richards to respond to as this is a prison responsibility.”

Source location

2015-0137-Response-by-Dorset-Health-Care-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 13 April 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026