PFD report

Frederick Robert Peter King · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 Nov 2022•Berkshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to provide adequate fluid
  2. Failure to maintain complete records of fluid provision and pad status
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care recordsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of fluid balance information
  3. Failure to record and convey family health concerns
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to acknowledge and act on family and carer safety concerns in patient care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The provider has taken sufficient action to mitigate risks and prevent future deaths.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide adequate fluid

Wider context from the report

“(1) Fred did not receive adequate fluid in the 2 days prior to his death (985 and 770 ml). There were also 10 days during August and September 2021 when Fred received less than the minimum level of fluid, he required namely 1200ml. This was in the context of very high temperatures in the week of his death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain complete records of fluid provision and pad status

Wider context from the report

“(2) Inadequate record keeping in the Birchwood Care made it difficult to obtain the relevant records for the Inquest and the records obtained were incomplete for example in terms of what recording timings of fluid provision, whether pads were wet/dry and also family concerns regarding health were not recorded and conveyed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records; Unreliable recording of fluid balance information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record and convey family health concerns

Wider context from the report

“(2) Inadequate record keeping in the Birchwood Care made it difficult to obtain the relevant records for the Inquest and the records obtained were incomplete for example in terms of what recording timings of fluid provision, whether pads were wet/dry and also family concerns regarding health were not recorded and conveyed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to acknowledge and act on family and carer safety concerns in patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of an on-site care home manager

Wider context from the report

“(3) There was no manager on the ground of the care home in the 3 days prior to Fred’s death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient care home management capacity and oversight.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The provider has taken sufficient action to mitigate risks and prevent future deaths.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We sent an urgent letter to the provider West Berkshire Council to confirm CQC had received the regulation 28 report and asked them to set out in writing evidence of the actions they had taken to date following this death and any additional action they intended to take in response to the prevention of future death report. We received a detailed response from the provider. We are satisfied the provider has taken sufficient action according to section 6 of the regulation 28 report to mitigate risks to people and prevent future deaths.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Consider the circumstances of Mr King’s death under the Enforcement Policy to determine whether to pursue criminal or civil enforcement action.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 November 2022.
  2. 2

    Conducted a follow-up inspection of Birchwood Care Home and reassessed the service as requiring improvement across all domains.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2022.
  3. 3

    Conducted a focused inspection of Birchwood Care Home in response to concerns about safety and leadership.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 November 2022.
  4. 4

    Carry out a follow-up comprehensive inspection of Birchwood Care Home by 25 August 2023 to assess progress and compliance with legal requirements.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 November 2022.
  5. 5

    Keep Birchwood Care Home under review and monitor provider progress and information received to inform regulatory inspection activity.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 November 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider the circumstances of Mr King’s death under the Enforcement Policy to determine whether to pursue criminal or civil enforcement action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, we will consider the circumstances which led to the death of Mr Frederick King in accordance with our Enforcement Policy to determine whether we need to pursue criminal or civil enforcement action. Our civil enforcement powers include;”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conducted a follow-up inspection of Birchwood Care Home and reassessed the service as requiring improvement across all domains.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During a follow up inspection conducted in July 2022, CQC rated Birchwood Care Home requires improvement in all domains. Please see the link to the report published 25 August 2022:”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 1 · response
Published 21 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conducted a focused inspection of Birchwood Care Home in response to concerns about safety and leadership.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In April 2022, prior to the conclusion of Mr Frederick King’s inquest, CQC conducted a further, focused inspection in response to concerns. Following this Birchwood Care Home was rated requires improvement in safe and inadequate in well led. Please see the following link to the report published 21 April 2022:”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 1 · response
Published 21 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Carry out a follow-up comprehensive inspection of Birchwood Care Home by 25 August 2023 to assess progress and compliance with legal requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are keeping the service under review and will be returning for a follow up comprehensive inspection to assess their progress by 25 August 2023. When services are rated requires improvement CQC requests an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress and we continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Keep Birchwood Care Home under review and monitor provider progress and information received to inform regulatory inspection activity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are keeping the service under review and will be returning for a follow up comprehensive inspection to assess their progress by 25 August 2023. When services are rated requires improvement CQC requests an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress and we continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 21 November 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026