PFD report

Billy Longshaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Mar 2022•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Flawed and limited review of serious clinical incidents
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes
  2. Failure to undertake detailed, rigorous and effective investigations of serious clinical incidents
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes
  3. Insufficient doctors’ familiarity with the practical application of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Flawed and limited review of serious clinical incidents

Wider context from the report

“2) The ’48 Hour Report for Significant incidents resulting in Moderate Harm and above’ prepared by an ED Consultant and others is fundamentally and obviously flawed (even when read against the Trust’s own medical records), prefaced as it is by the assumption that ‘the patient self-discharged against medical advice’. The Trust’s (limited) review of this matter represents a missed opportunity to consider vital issues such as the presentation of patients with significant learning disabilities to the Emergency Department, and the practical application of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in this clinical setting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to undertake detailed, rigorous and effective investigations of serious clinical incidents

Wider context from the report

“1) Notwithstanding Mr Longshaw died within 24 hours of being seen in the Emergency Department at Great Western Hospitals, Swindon, in circumstances where he was permitted to leave without basic blood tests being taken, any diagnosis being made, or serious abdominal pathology being fully excluded, it is a matter of concern that the Trust has not undertaken a detailed investigation into the care and treatment provided to him. Prompt, rigorous and effective investigations into serious clinical incidents are essential to deriving learning and improving patient safety; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations; Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient doctors’ familiarity with the practical application of the Mental Capacity Act 2005

Wider context from the report

“3) Mr Longshaw’s death raises issues as to the adequacy of education provided to medical students as to the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and doctors’ of all levels familiarity with the practical application of this legislation in clinical settings, and accompanying guidance such as that produced by the General Medical Council in this regard. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate education on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 for medical students

Wider context from the report

“3) Mr Longshaw’s death raises issues as to the adequacy of education provided to medical students as to the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and doctors’ of all levels familiarity with the practical application of this legislation in clinical settings, and accompanying guidance such as that produced by the General Medical Council in this regard. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.