PFD report

Jack William PARTINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Nov 2013•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Lack of national standardised guidance on the management of ventilation in neonates
  2. Failure to routinely check medical records for new neonatal admissions
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions
  3. Failure to routinely use disposable exhaled carbon dioxide detectors on the NNU
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable exhaled carbon dioxide monitoring for neonates
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Staffing, training, governance and clinical issues are local matters that should be addressed by the NHS Trust.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national standardised guidance on the management of ventilation in neonates

Wider context from the report

“4) There are no national standardised policies, protocols or guidance on the management and administration of paralysing agents to neonates in need of intubation and/or the management of ventilation in neonates. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely check medical records for new neonatal admissions

Wider context from the report

“1) That there was no 1:1 neonatal nurse/cotside ‘handover’ at shift change, no individualised neonatal nursing care plan in use and no routine checks of medical records for new neonatal admissions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely use disposable exhaled carbon dioxide detectors on the NNU

Wider context from the report

“3) That disposable exhaled carbon dioxide detectors (ET CO2) were not routinely used on the NNU (as an adjunct) and that they are not currently/routinely used in many NNUs throughout the country. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable exhaled carbon dioxide monitoring for neonates.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure effective oversight and monitoring of the ventilatory pressure dial following intubation

Wider context from the report

“5) No single individual within the neonatal (resuscitation) team was allocated to oversee and monitor the ventilatory pressure dial following intubation. The dial in question was situated on the side of the incubator/cot, out of the direct line of sight of the clinician controlling the airway/ventilatory process. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national standardised guidance on the management and administration of paralysing agents to neonates needing intubation

Wider context from the report

“4) There are no national standardised policies, protocols or guidance on the management and administration of paralysing agents to neonates in need of intubation and/or the management of ventilation in neonates. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make treatment decisions collaboratively and using all available information

Wider context from the report

“2) Nursing staff, rather than the multi-disciplinary team plus parents, took treatment/change of treatment decisions in isolation and without consulting all available information (such as medical records etc.) ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of individualised neonatal nursing care plans

Wider context from the report

“1) That there was no 1:1 neonatal nurse/cotside ‘handover’ at shift change, no individualised neonatal nursing care plan in use and no routine checks of medical records for new neonatal admissions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable care-planning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide 1:1 neonatal nurse/cotside handover at shift change

Wider context from the report

“1) That there was no 1:1 neonatal nurse/cotside ‘handover’ at shift change, no individualised neonatal nursing care plan in use and no routine checks of medical records for new neonatal admissions. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable shift handover processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Staffing, training, governance and clinical issues are local matters that should be addressed by the NHS Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note that you have sent a Regulation 28 report to the local NHS Trust for its response. I believe that the issues concerning staffing, staff training, governance and clinical issues are local issues that should properly be addressed by the Trust.”

Source location

2013-0308-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 21 February 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing neonatal service care guidance should cover carbon dioxide detectors and paralysing agents, so duplicate national guidance is unnecessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Guidance on the use of carbon dioxide detectors and the management and administration of paralysing agents to neonates in need of intubation should already be covered in the care guidance of every neonatal service. We do not therefore believe issuing duplicate guidance would be valuable. The Resuscitation Council (UK) has issued updated guidance on new-born life support, which recommends detection of exhaled carbon dioxide in addition to clinical assessment as the most reliable method to confirm placement of a tracheal tube in neonates with a spontaneous circulation. We have been advised by NHS England that carbon dioxide monitors are being used increasingly in neonatal units. However, their use in individual cases is a matter for the clinical judgement of the health professionals involved.”

Source location

2013-0308-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 21 February 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Notify the British Association of Perinatal Medicine so the concerns reach neonatal teams through its quality care process.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 February 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Notify the British Association of Perinatal Medicine so the concerns reach neonatal teams through its quality care process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I will ensure that this case is notified to the British Association of Perinatal Medicine. In this way, the issues of concern will be brought to the attention of other neonatal teams throughout the country via the Association’s quality care process.”

Source location

2013-0308-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 21 February 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026