PFD report

Shirley Anne Nightingale · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Dec 2019•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of a system requiring suitably experienced clinician agreement for departures from recognised best practice timescales
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable authorisation and documentation of departures from clinical plans and standards
  2. Lack of a clear system to follow up required OGD before the next-day AMU ward round
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure scheduled investigations are followed up
  3. Failure to record the rationale for departing from recognised best practice timescales
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably document the rationale for consequential decisionsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable authorisation and documentation of departures from clinical plans and standards
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system requiring suitably experienced clinician agreement for departures from recognised best practice timescales

Wider context from the report

“3. When a decision was made to depart from the recognised best practice timescales the rationale was not recorded and there was no system to ensure that a suitably experienced clinician agreed with the decision. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable authorisation and documentation of departures from clinical plans and standards.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear system to follow up required OGD before the next-day AMU ward round

Wider context from the report

“2. The inquest heard that it had been identified in Accident and Emergency that the OGD was required. The notes were marked accordingly but there was no clear system to ensure that this was followed up prior to the ward round on AMU the next day; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure scheduled investigations are followed up.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record the rationale for departing from recognised best practice timescales

Wider context from the report

“3. When a decision was made to depart from the recognised best practice timescales the rationale was not recorded and there was no system to ensure that a suitably experienced clinician agreed with the decision. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably document the rationale for consequential decisions; Unreliable authorisation and documentation of departures from clinical plans and standards.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a clear clinician escalation and prioritisation system for OGD lists and patient need when OGD capacity is unavailable

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard that there was no clear system for escalation /prioritisation by treating clinicians in relation to management of the OGD lists and patient need where the OGD team said there was no capacity; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable management of clinical waiting lists.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.