PFD report

Edith Kirkham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Feb 2016•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to read or understand medical and nursing notes
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions
  2. Inadequate staffing levels and expertise in the ward
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity
  3. Inadequate planning and unclear management standards for intermediate care
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable intermediate care arrangements
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to read or understand medical and nursing notes

Wider context from the report

“3. The staff, or some of them, who gave evidence at the inquest, had either failed to read the medical/nursing notes, or if they had so read them, they had failed to understand them. The consultant surgeon had clearly indicated that the patient was to mobilise and was able to fully weight-bear, however for the whole of the week she spent in this ward she was nursed in bed and not mobilised at all. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate staffing levels and expertise in the ward

Wider context from the report

“2. Perhaps as a result of the problems highlighted at (1) above, the ward appears to have been inadequately staffed, both as to numbers of staff and the level of expertise thereof. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate planning and unclear management standards for intermediate care

Wider context from the report

“1. The intermediate care arrangement at Darnton House, I was informed, was a joint venture between L and M Health care and Tameside Hospital, but there seems to have been inadequate planning and unclear rules as to the level and type of management required for the patients/residents. Was the required standard that of a hospital or that of a care home. No-one seemed to know and this led to general uncertainty. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable intermediate care arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to mobilise patients when clinically indicated

Wider context from the report

“3. The staff, or some of them, who gave evidence at the inquest, had either failed to read the medical/nursing notes, or if they had so read them, they had failed to understand them. The consultant surgeon had clearly indicated that the patient was to mobilise and was able to fully weight-bear, however for the whole of the week she spent in this ward she was nursed in bed and not mobilised at all. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of records for patients’ ward stays

Wider context from the report

“6. Despite the request from me as HM Senior Coroner, it appears that no records were available relating to the whole of her stay in this ward. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in arranging indicated physiotherapy

Wider context from the report

“5. Mrs Kirkham was moved to the intermediate care ward on a Friday preceding a bank-holiday weekend, and despite the clear indication that she was to have physiotherapy, none was arranged for four days after her arrival. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to hand over patients’ individual needs from hospital to the ward

Wider context from the report

“4. There was no apparent handover from the hospital to this ward, as to the individual needs of the patient, and the staff were therefore placed in an impossible position. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.