PFD report

Susan Ann Smalley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Nov 2017•Gloucestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Insufficient ambulance resources to meet demand in the Gloucestershire area
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls
  2. Lack of clarity about which hospital should treat the patient
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital destination selection for patient transfers
  3. Failure to appropriately expedite urgent emergency transfers between hospitals
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate coordination between hospitals during patient carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient ambulance resources to meet demand in the Gloucestershire area

Wider context from the report

“1. The sufficiency of ambulance resources that have been allocated to meet demand in the Gloucestershire area, ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity about which hospital should treat the patient

Wider context from the report

“2. Whether clinicians, patients and paramedics are clear as to which hospital, either Gloucester Royal Hospital or Cheltenham General hospital, should be treating the patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital destination selection for patient transfers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to appropriately expedite urgent emergency transfers between hospitals

Wider context from the report

“3. When urgent emergency transfers are requested between hospitals, how they are appropriately expedited. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate coordination between hospitals during patient care; Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.