PFD report

Giuseppe TABONE and Andrew EVANS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Mar 2024•East Sussex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Confusion about when full prisoner roll checks are required
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisonersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable prison roll-check procedures
  2. Insufficient monitoring of staff completion of required prisoner checks
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners
  3. Failure by staff to understand the importance of completing every required roll check
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisonersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable prison roll-check procedures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Publish staff notices reinforcing the importance of completing roll checks and prompting key safety observations.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 March 2024.
  2. Action

    Provide on-the-job roll-check support and training through standards coaching team staff shadowing officers at HMP Lewes.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 March 2024.
  3. Action

    Issue a staff notice communicating learning from the inquest about roll checks after the review is complete.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 March 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing roll-check assurance measures and staff accountability are considered sufficient; staff must be trusted to perform required duties.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Confusion about when full prisoner roll checks are required

Wider context from the report

“At the inquest, two prison staff admitted that they had independently failed to carry out the required roll checks on L wing at 7.30pm and 8.45pm on the evening of 27 June 2022. One officer recorded on the wing log book that he had carried out the 7.30pm check, even though he did not do so. The other gave evidence that he did not carry out the 8.45pm check because he was distracted by the day shift officers, who were watching videos in the control room and were not responding to prisoner's cell bell calls. The staff members concerned have been subject to disciplinary proceedings, but continue to work at the prison. It was not possible to say on the evidence whether Andrew or Giuseppe’s lives could have been saved had the required roll checks been carried out. Evidence was given that, since this incident, staff have been provided with ‘bite size’ training on roll checks, although neither of the staff members concerned had received this training. I remain concerned that there is a risk of future deaths caused by prison staff at HMP Lewes failing to carry out the required checks on prisoners, particularly during the night state. The purpose of roll checks is to ensure that each prisoner is present and alive and well. If a roll check is not carried out, there is a risk that a prisoner in need of medical attention and unable to ring the cell bell could remain undiscovered until the morning. There was confusion from staff at the prison as to when full roll checks are required. Further, I am concerned that staff may know when roll checks are required but not fully understand the importance of carrying out every required check. Both staff members concerned were aware that the roll check was required, but did not carry it out because they thought that checks had been carried out by other staff members. I am also concerned that there are insufficient measures in place to monitor staff to ensure that all required checks are being carried out. There may be lessons that can be learnt from other prisons as to how to ensure checks are always carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners; Unreliable prison roll-check procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient monitoring of staff completion of required prisoner checks

Wider context from the report

“At the inquest, two prison staff admitted that they had independently failed to carry out the required roll checks on L wing at 7.30pm and 8.45pm on the evening of 27 June 2022. One officer recorded on the wing log book that he had carried out the 7.30pm check, even though he did not do so. The other gave evidence that he did not carry out the 8.45pm check because he was distracted by the day shift officers, who were watching videos in the control room and were not responding to prisoner's cell bell calls. The staff members concerned have been subject to disciplinary proceedings, but continue to work at the prison. It was not possible to say on the evidence whether Andrew or Giuseppe’s lives could have been saved had the required roll checks been carried out. Evidence was given that, since this incident, staff have been provided with ‘bite size’ training on roll checks, although neither of the staff members concerned had received this training. I remain concerned that there is a risk of future deaths caused by prison staff at HMP Lewes failing to carry out the required checks on prisoners, particularly during the night state. The purpose of roll checks is to ensure that each prisoner is present and alive and well. If a roll check is not carried out, there is a risk that a prisoner in need of medical attention and unable to ring the cell bell could remain undiscovered until the morning. There was confusion from staff at the prison as to when full roll checks are required. Further, I am concerned that staff may know when roll checks are required but not fully understand the importance of carrying out every required check. Both staff members concerned were aware that the roll check was required, but did not carry it out because they thought that checks had been carried out by other staff members. I am also concerned that there are insufficient measures in place to monitor staff to ensure that all required checks are being carried out. There may be lessons that can be learnt from other prisons as to how to ensure checks are always carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure by staff to understand the importance of completing every required roll check

Wider context from the report

“At the inquest, two prison staff admitted that they had independently failed to carry out the required roll checks on L wing at 7.30pm and 8.45pm on the evening of 27 June 2022. One officer recorded on the wing log book that he had carried out the 7.30pm check, even though he did not do so. The other gave evidence that he did not carry out the 8.45pm check because he was distracted by the day shift officers, who were watching videos in the control room and were not responding to prisoner's cell bell calls. The staff members concerned have been subject to disciplinary proceedings, but continue to work at the prison. It was not possible to say on the evidence whether Andrew or Giuseppe’s lives could have been saved had the required roll checks been carried out. Evidence was given that, since this incident, staff have been provided with ‘bite size’ training on roll checks, although neither of the staff members concerned had received this training. I remain concerned that there is a risk of future deaths caused by prison staff at HMP Lewes failing to carry out the required checks on prisoners, particularly during the night state. The purpose of roll checks is to ensure that each prisoner is present and alive and well. If a roll check is not carried out, there is a risk that a prisoner in need of medical attention and unable to ring the cell bell could remain undiscovered until the morning. There was confusion from staff at the prison as to when full roll checks are required. Further, I am concerned that staff may know when roll checks are required but not fully understand the importance of carrying out every required check. Both staff members concerned were aware that the roll check was required, but did not carry it out because they thought that checks had been carried out by other staff members. I am also concerned that there are insufficient measures in place to monitor staff to ensure that all required checks are being carried out. There may be lessons that can be learnt from other prisons as to how to ensure checks are always carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners; Unreliable prison roll-check procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to carry out required prisoner roll checks

Wider context from the report

“At the inquest, two prison staff admitted that they had independently failed to carry out the required roll checks on L wing at 7.30pm and 8.45pm on the evening of 27 June 2022. One officer recorded on the wing log book that he had carried out the 7.30pm check, even though he did not do so. The other gave evidence that he did not carry out the 8.45pm check because he was distracted by the day shift officers, who were watching videos in the control room and were not responding to prisoner's cell bell calls. The staff members concerned have been subject to disciplinary proceedings, but continue to work at the prison. It was not possible to say on the evidence whether Andrew or Giuseppe’s lives could have been saved had the required roll checks been carried out. Evidence was given that, since this incident, staff have been provided with ‘bite size’ training on roll checks, although neither of the staff members concerned had received this training. I remain concerned that there is a risk of future deaths caused by prison staff at HMP Lewes failing to carry out the required checks on prisoners, particularly during the night state. The purpose of roll checks is to ensure that each prisoner is present and alive and well. If a roll check is not carried out, there is a risk that a prisoner in need of medical attention and unable to ring the cell bell could remain undiscovered until the morning. There was confusion from staff at the prison as to when full roll checks are required. Further, I am concerned that staff may know when roll checks are required but not fully understand the importance of carrying out every required check. Both staff members concerned were aware that the roll check was required, but did not carry it out because they thought that checks had been carried out by other staff members. I am also concerned that there are insufficient measures in place to monitor staff to ensure that all required checks are being carried out. There may be lessons that can be learnt from other prisons as to how to ensure checks are always carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to carry out required overnight checks; Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inaccurate recording of prisoner roll checks

Wider context from the report

“At the inquest, two prison staff admitted that they had independently failed to carry out the required roll checks on L wing at 7.30pm and 8.45pm on the evening of 27 June 2022. One officer recorded on the wing log book that he had carried out the 7.30pm check, even though he did not do so. The other gave evidence that he did not carry out the 8.45pm check because he was distracted by the day shift officers, who were watching videos in the control room and were not responding to prisoner's cell bell calls. The staff members concerned have been subject to disciplinary proceedings, but continue to work at the prison. It was not possible to say on the evidence whether Andrew or Giuseppe’s lives could have been saved had the required roll checks been carried out. Evidence was given that, since this incident, staff have been provided with ‘bite size’ training on roll checks, although neither of the staff members concerned had received this training. I remain concerned that there is a risk of future deaths caused by prison staff at HMP Lewes failing to carry out the required checks on prisoners, particularly during the night state. The purpose of roll checks is to ensure that each prisoner is present and alive and well. If a roll check is not carried out, there is a risk that a prisoner in need of medical attention and unable to ring the cell bell could remain undiscovered until the morning. There was confusion from staff at the prison as to when full roll checks are required. Further, I am concerned that staff may know when roll checks are required but not fully understand the importance of carrying out every required check. Both staff members concerned were aware that the roll check was required, but did not carry it out because they thought that checks had been carried out by other staff members. I am also concerned that there are insufficient measures in place to monitor staff to ensure that all required checks are being carried out. There may be lessons that can be learnt from other prisons as to how to ensure checks are always carried out. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of required observations in care and custody.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish staff notices reinforcing the importance of completing roll checks and prompting key safety observations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am also informed that the prison has published notices to staff highlighting the importance of carrying out roll checks in line with expectations. A notice to staff was issued in August 2023 which prompts staff to consider three points when carrying out roll checks:”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide on-the-job roll-check support and training through standards coaching team staff shadowing officers at HMP Lewes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that HMP Lewes has planned further sessions of ‘bite size’ training on roll checks. The two members of staff who gave evidence that they had not received the training will be required to attend as a priority. Additionally, the prison has received support from the standards coaching team, a national resource, which consisted of a team of experienced prison staff shadowing officers at HMP Lewes to provide support and on-the-job training. The team covered roll checks as part of the support.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a staff notice communicating learning from the inquest about roll checks after the review is complete.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the inquest into the deaths of Mr Tabone and Mr Evans, the prison is reviewing roll checks to ensure that processes are in line with new staffing profiles and regime planning which is currently being reviewed and updated. Once this work is complete, a new notice to staff will be issued setting out learning from the inquest around roll checks.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue taking appropriate action, including disciplinary action where necessary, when staff fail to meet roll-check expectations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Staff are aware that CCTV is in use around the establishment and that their actions may be scrutinised following an incident such as a death in custody. If staff are found to have failed to carry out the required tasks or when there is a question over their performance and ability there will be a thorough investigation to determine what has happened and to ensure that staff who fail to uphold the values of HMPPS by putting prisoner’s safety at risk are held to account through disciplinary procedures. Staff are aware that failure to carry out the duties entrusted to them will result in disciplinary action, and that, depending on the circumstances, the outcome may range from advice and guidance in order to support them to perform better, to dismissal from the service.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and clarify the roll-check local operating procedure, including required times and recording arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Governor of HMP Lewes has informed me that the prison’s LOP on roll checks was reviewed in August 2023 and clearly sets out the times that roll checks are required to be carried out and where staff must sign to confirm that the checks have been completed. The LOP provides guidance on checks during the week, on weekends and during the night state so that staff understand what their duties are at all times.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 19 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver further bite-size roll-check training sessions, prioritising staff who previously lacked the training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that HMP Lewes has planned further sessions of ‘bite size’ training on roll checks. The two members of staff who gave evidence that they had not received the training will be required to attend as a priority. Additionally, the prison has received support from the standards coaching team, a national resource, which consisted of a team of experienced prison staff shadowing officers at HMP Lewes to provide support and on-the-job training. The team covered roll checks as part of the support.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the roll-check process against new staffing profiles and regime planning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the inquest into the deaths of Mr Tabone and Mr Evans, the prison is reviewing roll checks to ensure that processes are in line with new staffing profiles and regime planning which is currently being reviewed and updated. Once this work is complete, a new notice to staff will be issued setting out learning from the inquest around roll checks.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 March 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing roll-check assurance measures and staff accountability are considered sufficient; staff must be trusted to perform required duties.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that evidence was given at the inquest on the assurance measures in place for roll checks at the prison but that you remain concerned that the measures are insufficient. Whilst I am also concerned to learn of instances where staff have not carried out their duties in line with clear expectations, we must be able to trust staff to carry out the required tasks that are fundamental to their role. HMP Lewes also holds a daily briefing which provides an opportunity to update and remind staff of the duties to be carried out as well as to convey any other important information.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 19 March 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026