PFD report

Terence Ryan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Sep 2017•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of alerts for new medications subject to repeat prescription
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical safety-alert systems
  2. Failure to notify relevant support services and contacts after patient self-discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge
  3. Failure to record externally requested new medications on repeat prescriptions
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate recording of medication prescribing decisions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Study and discuss the repeat prescribing and scanning protocols at a practice meeting.

    Stated by Grasmere SurgeryStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2017.
  2. Action

    Arrange a follow-up meeting in three months to review how the prescribing protocol is working within the practice.

    Stated by Grasmere SurgeryStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 October 2017.
  3. Action

    Meet with all receptionists and nurses to address the protocols.

    Stated by Grasmere SurgeryStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The existing self-discharge policy and electronic discharge system require GP discharge letters for all patients, addressing discharge communication.

    Stated by Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of alerts for new medications subject to repeat prescription

Wider context from the report

“i. On the 15th July 2016 a Consultant prescribed Edoxaban 60mg per day for long term anticoagulation treatment to be collected by the deceased on a weekly basis by repeat prescription issued by the General Practitioner and the Consultant sent a letter to the General Practitioner to confirm that plan of treatment. The repeat prescription for Edoxaban was not put on the deceased’s repeat prescriptions by the General Practitioner and the deceased did not receive Edoxaban for administration after the 22nd July 2016 and he would not have had a supply of Edoxaban following his self-discharge from the Hospital on the 10th November 2016. The General Practitioner gave evidence that the Surgery had undertaken a “Significant Event Analysis” as to how the Edoxaban prescription had been missed and the investigation resulted in the following recommendations within the Surgery to prevent a recurrence:- a. GP to review “active problems” on the computer system when any patient comes in, in order to ensure patient is on the appropriate treatment. b. In respect of discharge letters directing new medication – the letter will be sent on a task to a prescription clerk, who will add the new medication and issue a month’s supply. If necessary (depending on the type of medication involved) the task will include sending a request to the patient to see the GP for review in a month’s time. However, the General Practitioner confirmed that the above recommendations had not been included in any formal documented protocol and I was not satisfied that there was to be a note on a patient’s record to alert a Doctor to a new medication subject to repeat prescription, bearing in mind that the deceased had seen a General Practitioner on the 13th September 2016, the 30th September 2016 and the 14th October 2016 without the omission being checked. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical safety-alert systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to notify relevant support services and contacts after patient self-discharge

Wider context from the report

“ii. The evidence at the Inquest revealed that the Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust does not have a protocol with regard to patients who self-discharge from the Hospital, particularly where they may be receiving necessary medication in the form of anticoagulation treatment. At the Inquest the deceased was identified as an vulnerable patient and the absence of a protocol is even more important in relation to a vulnerable patient. There is no protocol to contact the Police, General Practitioner, Family or Social Services to bring it to their attention that a patient has self-discharged so that they become aware and they can make contact with the patient following his discharge to ensure that he has appropriate support and necessary medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record externally requested new medications on repeat prescriptions

Wider context from the report

“i. On the 15th July 2016 a Consultant prescribed Edoxaban 60mg per day for long term anticoagulation treatment to be collected by the deceased on a weekly basis by repeat prescription issued by the General Practitioner and the Consultant sent a letter to the General Practitioner to confirm that plan of treatment. The repeat prescription for Edoxaban was not put on the deceased’s repeat prescriptions by the General Practitioner and the deceased did not receive Edoxaban for administration after the 22nd July 2016 and he would not have had a supply of Edoxaban following his self-discharge from the Hospital on the 10th November 2016. The General Practitioner gave evidence that the Surgery had undertaken a “Significant Event Analysis” as to how the Edoxaban prescription had been missed and the investigation resulted in the following recommendations within the Surgery to prevent a recurrence:- a. GP to review “active problems” on the computer system when any patient comes in, in order to ensure patient is on the appropriate treatment. b. In respect of discharge letters directing new medication – the letter will be sent on a task to a prescription clerk, who will add the new medication and issue a month’s supply. If necessary (depending on the type of medication involved) the task will include sending a request to the patient to see the GP for review in a month’s time. However, the General Practitioner confirmed that the above recommendations had not been included in any formal documented protocol and I was not satisfied that there was to be a note on a patient’s record to alert a Doctor to a new medication subject to repeat prescription, bearing in mind that the deceased had seen a General Practitioner on the 13th September 2016, the 30th September 2016 and the 14th October 2016 without the omission being checked. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate recording of medication prescribing decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a protocol for patients self-discharging from hospital without necessary medication

Wider context from the report

“ii. The evidence at the Inquest revealed that the Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust does not have a protocol with regard to patients who self-discharge from the Hospital, particularly where they may be receiving necessary medication in the form of anticoagulation treatment. At the Inquest the deceased was identified as an vulnerable patient and the absence of a protocol is even more important in relation to a vulnerable patient. There is no protocol to contact the Police, General Practitioner, Family or Social Services to bring it to their attention that a patient has self-discharged so that they become aware and they can make contact with the patient following his discharge to ensure that he has appropriate support and necessary medication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure patients receive the correct prescribed medication at hospital discharge; Failure to ensure safe post-discharge arrangements for vulnerable patients and residents; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Study and discuss the repeat prescribing and scanning protocols at a practice meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I enclose copies of our Repeat Prescribing Protocol; this includes the ‘Protection on Prescribing’ including hospital letters.”

Source location

2017-0225-Response-by-Grasmere-Surgery
Page 1 · response
Published 6 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Arrange a follow-up meeting in three months to review how the prescribing protocol is working within the practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A further meeting will be arranged in three month's time to review how the Prescribing Protocol has been working within the Practice.”

Source location

2017-0225-Response-by-Grasmere-Surgery
Page 1 · response
Published 6 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet with all receptionists and nurses to address the protocols.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I enclose copies of our Repeat Prescribing Protocol; this includes the ‘Protection on Prescribing’ including hospital letters.”

Source location

2017-0225-Response-by-Grasmere-Surgery
Page 1 · response
Published 6 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the electronic hospital information system to provide ward managers with daily lists of missing discharge summaries and promptly rectify failures or delays in sending them to GPs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you will be aware the Trust has now implemented a Hospital Information System (HIS) which is an electronic patient records system. Discharge letters are generated electronically through this system. I have been informed that as part of the audit of this system, the Ward Manager will receive a daily list of the patients for whom a discharge summary has not been completed. This is a real time audit so action can be taken to rectify this issue immediately and a discharge summary can be sent to the patient’s GP as the patient is being discharged/shortly after their discharge from the hospital.”

Source location

2017-0225-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 6 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue communicating self-discharge policy requirements to clinical and nursing staff through bulletins, meetings, induction, briefings and read-and-sign materials.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have been informed that a bulletin with the key requirements of the Policy for Self-Discharge Against Medical Advice has been prepared for both clinicians and for the nursing staff to heighten awareness of the policy and ensure compliance. This information has been and will be shared/communicated in the following ways:”

Source location

2017-0225-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 6 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a more sophisticated audit of hospital information system records to assess information quality and identify discharge-summary failures or delays in real time.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The HIS system is audited and work is currently being undertaken to develop a more sophisticated audit system to assess the quality of the information recorded on HIS. As such the Trust is continually seeking to improve its systems to ensure the best care possible for its patients.”

Source location

2017-0225-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 6 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assign self-discharge codes and conduct monthly audits to verify that discharge letters are sent to patients’ GPs, urgently rectifying omissions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, I believe that the Trust’s medical coders, who attach a code to each patient to help categorise patients to enable data to be collated, now assign a code to any patient who has self-discharged. At the end of each month an audit is conducted of the patients with a self-discharge code to check that a discharge letter has been sent to each patient’s GP. For any patients without a discharge letter, the Division is notified and a letter is sent to the patient’s GP urgently.”

Source location

2017-0225-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 6 October 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The existing self-discharge policy and electronic discharge system require GP discharge letters for all patients, addressing discharge communication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Please can I assure you that the Trust does have a Policy for “Self-discharge Against Medical Advice”. I enclose a copy of this policy for your information. This version of the Policy was approved in November 2014 and was in place at the time that Mr Ryan was treated at the Trust.”

Source location

2017-0225-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026