PFD report

Kamal Yahyia AL-HIRSI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Aug 2018•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
14

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
23

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised14

  1. Failure of written procedures to specify action for a bather in difficulty
  2. CCTV failing to provide visibility of the pool underwater and in blind spots
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming poolsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate surveillance of swimmers and water usersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems
  3. Failure of the alarm-response process to provide trained responders with the nature of the emergency
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of emergency alarm responsePart of recurring concern: Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangements
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.17

  1. Action

    Prohibit pool cleaning by diving or entering the water across all sites.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 October 2018.
  2. Action

    Require documented Workplace Induction Checklists covering emergency and lifesaving equipment locations and use.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 October 2018.
  3. Action

    Pilot the revised emergency response system at the Maida Vale and Durham health clubs.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 October 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Changes to policies and procedures were deferred pending the inquest and investigations by the Metropolitan Police and London Borough of Camden.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of written procedures to specify action for a bather in difficulty

Wider context from the report

“10. The written procedures did not detail the action that should be taken on noting a bather in difficulty; they talked about RLSS (Royal Life Saving Society) techniques being used but these were never taught; and the duty manager at the time gave evidence that he did not ever remember reading the standard operating procedures or emergency action plan. Of particular concern to me is that, ten months following Mr Al-Hirsi’s death, many of these practices remain entirely unchanged. For example, evidence was heard that no thought has been given to obtaining another camera; no thought to moving the CCTV monitor; and no thought to giving the staff water safety awareness training. Some refresher training is being given, but this was only started two weeks before the inquest began on Monday, and still no consideration has been given to including the freelance personal trainer (whose response to Mr Al-Hirsi was immediate and effective) in training regarding health and safety procedures within the club. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

CCTV failing to provide visibility of the pool underwater and in blind spots

Wider context from the report

“8. The pool was not under continuous supervision and there was no legal requirement for a lifeguard, but it was under CCTV surveillance. However, the camera was placed at such a position that it could not detect what was happening under water, and there was a blind spot in that part of the pool nearest the camera. After Mr Al-Hirsi slipped under water, he was completely invisible to the camera. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools; Inadequate surveillance of swimmers and water users; Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the alarm-response process to provide trained responders with the nature of the emergency

Wider context from the report

“5. The panic button alarm was audible by a beeping sound in reception and a light was illuminated on a control panel there, but this relied solely on the reactions of one individual who was not necessarily first aid trained and, if the receptionist did call 999, s/he would not necessarily know the nature of the emergency. In this instance, the receptionist who called an ambulance did not know that Mr Al-Hirsi had suffered a cardiac arrest. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency alarm response; Unreliable on-site emergency medical and first-aid response arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of emergency communication routes to reliably contact the duty manager

Wider context from the report

“6. The protocol in place was that, on hearing an alarm, the receptionist should simply contact the duty manager (who was the designated site first aider): first by radio; failing that by sending someone to find him; and failing that by ringing the duty manager’s mobile phone. The receptionist gave evidence that the radios often didn’t work, though the regional manager disagreed. When the receptionist was notified that there was an emergency, she could not use the radio because the duty manager had not picked a radio up; she was unsure where he was; and when she rang him on his mobile, she did not get through because there is a poor reception in the plant room where he was working. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to emergency communication.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of panic-button alarms to alert staff throughout the building

Wider context from the report

“4. Some members of staff did not know the exact location of the panic buttons, nor the circumstances in which they should be pressed. The panic buttons did not sound an audible alarm throughout the building, so anyone pressing a button would not know if it had alerted others, and staff elsewhere (other than at reception) would be unaware that there was an emergency. It did not occur to the cleaner who first realised that Mr Al-Hirsi was in difficulty to press the alarm, but even if she had, this would not have brought other staff running to help. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency alarm response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure staff know the location and use of panic buttons

Wider context from the report

“4. Some members of staff did not know the exact location of the panic buttons, nor the circumstances in which they should be pressed. The panic buttons did not sound an audible alarm throughout the building, so anyone pressing a button would not know if it had alerted others, and staff elsewhere (other than at reception) would be unaware that there was an emergency. It did not occur to the cleaner who first realised that Mr Al-Hirsi was in difficulty to press the alarm, but even if she had, this would not have brought other staff running to help. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain effective CCTV monitoring of the pool

Wider context from the report

“9. The CCTV monitor was in reception. This was meant to be observed every 15 minutes (to ensure maximum bather load had not been exceeded, rather than to look for bathers in distress), but these observations had fallen out of practice, and the monitor was behind the head of the receptionist, so it was never in her normal field of view. She had to turn her back on the public to look at it. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safety CCTV monitoring systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure the duty manager reads the standard operating procedures and emergency action plan

Wider context from the report

“10. The written procedures did not detail the action that should be taken on noting a bather in difficulty; they talked about RLSS (Royal Life Saving Society) techniques being used but these were never taught; and the duty manager at the time gave evidence that he did not ever remember reading the standard operating procedures or emergency action plan. Of particular concern to me is that, ten months following Mr Al-Hirsi’s death, many of these practices remain entirely unchanged. For example, evidence was heard that no thought has been given to obtaining another camera; no thought to moving the CCTV monitor; and no thought to giving the staff water safety awareness training. Some refresher training is being given, but this was only started two weeks before the inquest began on Monday, and still no consideration has been given to including the freelance personal trainer (whose response to Mr Al-Hirsi was immediate and effective) in training regarding health and safety procedures within the club. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication and understanding of emergency policies and procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure pool-cleaning partners can undertake an emergency water rescue

Wider context from the report

“2. No thought appeared to have been given to the fact that the cleaner who often partnered Mr Al-Hirsi in the pool cleaning process, standing on poolside and directing him, was a non swimmer and not confident to enter the water even at a depth of 1.5m. In the event, she relied on a club member to undertake the rescue. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of staff defibrillator location and use training

Wider context from the report

“7. There seemed a lack of meaningful awareness of the defibrillator location and function. The first person trained in CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) to respond to the calls for help was a freelance personal trainer who was not a member of Bannatyne staff. Although he was trained, he did not take the defibrillator (there was only one and it was located in the gym) with him, because at that stage he did not know that Mr Al-Hirsi had suffered a cardiac arrest. Some staff members had not received defibrillator training. When the personal trainer reached Mr Al-Hirsi and realised the exact nature of the emergency, the only other person on poolside at that point who seemed confident of the location of the defibrillator, was a club member who happened to be a retired doctor. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff training and familiarisation in defibrillator use.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of safe pool-cleaning equipment

Wider context from the report

“1. Mr Al-Hirsi cleaned the pool by diving down with a suction hose and holding his breath. This had always been the method at Maida Vale, because there was no pole or extension head. Whilst this did not have an impact on Mr Al-Hirsi’s death, evidence was heard that it was inherently dangerous. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of staff training in the use of pool lifesaving aids

Wider context from the report

“3. Members of staff had not been given any water safety awareness training. Some did not have a proper understanding of the ways in which a person in difficulty in the water may present, for example that they will not necessarily wave in distress, and that they may sink rather than float. Mr Al-Hirsi simply sank to the bottom of the pool. Bannatyne’s had not trained staff in the use of pool lifesaving aids. The cleaner who first tried to help Mr Al-Hirsi attempted to poke him with a float, but the float did what it was meant to, it floated. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to teach the lifesaving techniques required by pool procedures

Wider context from the report

“10. The written procedures did not detail the action that should be taken on noting a bather in difficulty; they talked about RLSS (Royal Life Saving Society) techniques being used but these were never taught; and the duty manager at the time gave evidence that he did not ever remember reading the standard operating procedures or emergency action plan. Of particular concern to me is that, ten months following Mr Al-Hirsi’s death, many of these practices remain entirely unchanged. For example, evidence was heard that no thought has been given to obtaining another camera; no thought to moving the CCTV monitor; and no thought to giving the staff water safety awareness training. Some refresher training is being given, but this was only started two weeks before the inquest began on Monday, and still no consideration has been given to including the freelance personal trainer (whose response to Mr Al-Hirsi was immediate and effective) in training regarding health and safety procedures within the club. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of staff water safety awareness training

Wider context from the report

“3. Members of staff had not been given any water safety awareness training. Some did not have a proper understanding of the ways in which a person in difficulty in the water may present, for example that they will not necessarily wave in distress, and that they may sink rather than float. Mr Al-Hirsi simply sank to the bottom of the pool. Bannatyne’s had not trained staff in the use of pool lifesaving aids. The cleaner who first tried to help Mr Al-Hirsi attempted to poke him with a float, but the float did what it was meant to, it floated. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prohibit pool cleaning by diving or entering the water across all sites.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prior to the incident, the Board of Directors of Bannatyne Fitness Limited (“the Company”) were unaware that the pool at Maida Vale had been cleaned in this unauthorised manner. Steps have now been taken across all of the Company’s sites to ensure that pools are not cleaned using this method. It is understood however that this was an isolated occurrence and not commonplace in the Company’s other sites. For the record however, the Company wishes to state that the evidence given at the inquest did not show, certainly to the Company’s satisfaction, that this method of cleaning, whilst not acceptable, was “inherently dangerous”. Indeed, the pool had been cleaned at Maida Vale in this way for a number of years without incident, and as the evidence confirmed, it played no part whatsoever in Mr Al Hirsi’s death.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 1 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require documented Workplace Induction Checklists covering emergency and lifesaving equipment locations and use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company also now requires all of its new and existing employees to undertake a documented Workplace Induction Checklist, where they will be given a guided tour of their site to ensure that they are aware of the location and use of the building’s emergency and life saving apparatus. The Company will ensure that all existing employees complete this by 15 November 2018.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pilot the revised emergency response system at the Maida Vale and Durham health clubs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has reviewed and amended its EAP, procedures and notification process for emergencies at the Maida Vale Club. Receptionists have been re-trained in recognising an alarm and the immediate next steps to be taken. The panic buttons when pressed will activate an automated message, which will be audible from all member areas of the Club and will notify all staff, including the Duty Manager(s), to muster at the Club’s Reception. The Duty Manager will dispatch employees to the emergency together with the Defibrillator and the other emergency equipment. The Company’s contractors will complete the installation work by 10 October 2018. It is the Company’s intention to pilot this revised emergency response system at its Maida Vale and Durham health clubs. Following a review of these systems, the Company intends to roll it out across its estate.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 3 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend emergency procedures and notification processes, and retrain receptionists on alarm recognition and immediate response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has reviewed and amended its EAP, procedures and notification process for emergencies at the Maida Vale Club. Receptionists have been re-trained in recognising an alarm and the immediate next steps to be taken. The panic buttons when pressed will activate an automated message, which will be audible from all member areas of the Club and will notify all staff, including the Duty Manager(s), to muster at the Club’s Reception. The Duty Manager will dispatch employees to the emergency together with the Defibrillator and the other emergency equipment. The Company’s contractors will complete the installation work by 10 October 2018. It is the Company’s intention to pilot this revised emergency response system at its Maida Vale and Durham health clubs. Following a review of these systems, the Company intends to roll it out across its estate.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 3 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review emergency action procedures, procedures and notification processes across all sites.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has also reviewed its EAPs, procedures and notification processes across all of its sites.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 4 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and update water-safety procedures through the Water Users Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has removed references to RLSS techniques from the Club’s documentation. This was an unfortunate error. In September 2017 the Company set up a Water Users Group consisting of representatives of the Company’s general managers, regional operations managers, regional estates managers, the Company’s board of directors and external stakeholders/suppliers. The Company has widened the scope of the Water Users Group’s remit and will review and update the Company’s procedures in relation to this area by 31 March 2019.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reinstate 15-minute CCTV checks at Maida Vale.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has moved the CCTV monitor at its Maida Club to a more suitable location so that the CCTV monitor is in the constant line of sight of its Receptionists. The Company has also reinstated the 15 minute CCTV checks at its Maida Vale Club, which formed part of the Company’s Normal Operating Procedure and risk assessments.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mandatory water-safety awareness training through the Learning Management System.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In January 2018, the Company employed two new members of staff; a Health & Safety Compliance Manager (who was previously employed by the Company’s Primary Authority) and a Learning & Development Manager to improve its training and compliance. Subsequent to this, the Company procured and, in May 2018, launched a new online Learning Management System. In order to enhance its employees’ existing knowledge, all staff are currently undertaking mandatory training modules.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure all existing employees complete the documented Workplace Induction Checklist.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company also now requires all of its new and existing employees to undertake a documented Workplace Induction Checklist, where they will be given a guided tour of their site to ensure that they are aware of the location and use of the building’s emergency and life saving apparatus. The Company will ensure that all existing employees complete this by 15 November 2018.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Upskill designated first aiders to obtain pool responder qualifications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is also the Company’s intention to upskill its designated first aiders to have a pool responder qualification. We will endeavour to complete this by 31 December 2018.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 1 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install an automated panic-button message audible throughout member areas and notifying staff to muster at reception.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has reviewed and amended its EAP, procedures and notification process for emergencies at the Maida Vale Club. Receptionists have been re-trained in recognising an alarm and the immediate next steps to be taken. The panic buttons when pressed will activate an automated message, which will be audible from all member areas of the Club and will notify all staff, including the Duty Manager(s), to muster at the Club’s Reception. The Duty Manager will dispatch employees to the emergency together with the Defibrillator and the other emergency equipment. The Company’s contractors will complete the installation work by 10 October 2018. It is the Company’s intention to pilot this revised emergency response system at its Maida Vale and Durham health clubs. Following a review of these systems, the Company intends to roll it out across its estate.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 3 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Relocate defibrillators to reception areas across all sites.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the time of Kamal’s death there was signage at the Club’s reception stating the whereabouts of the defibrillator. This was standard at all of the Company’s sites; defibrillators were not encased or hidden away in offices, but were located in a bracket on gym floors clearly signed in prominent locations and visible to employees, members and visitors. However, following the inquest and your Regulation 28 Report, the Company has taken the decision to relocate defibrillators to sites’ reception area, where they can be readily seen and accessed by all. The Company can confirm that this has been completed across all of its sites.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 4 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Move the Maida Vale CCTV monitor into receptionists’ constant line of sight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has moved the CCTV monitor at its Maida Club to a more suitable location so that the CCTV monitor is in the constant line of sight of its Receptionists. The Company has also reinstated the 15 minute CCTV checks at its Maida Vale Club, which formed part of the Company’s Normal Operating Procedure and risk assessments.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Centrally audit emergency procedures and documented drills quarterly.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As noted above, the Company requires all of its new and existing employees to undertake a documented Workplace Induction Checklist, where they will be given a guided tour of their site to ensure that they are aware of the location and use of the building’s emergency and life saving apparatus. The Company will also review its Emergency Action Procedures (“EAP”) and ensure that its employees participate in regular documented drills. The Company’s new Health & Safety Compliance Manager will audit these centrally on a quarterly basis from 1 October 2018.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reposition Maida Vale pool CCTV cameras and add cameras to remove the identified blind spot.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has undertaken a review of its CCTV coverage of the pool at its Maida Vale Club and has commissioned the work for the repositioning of the CCTV cameras. These works will be completed by 31 October 2018 and will include additional cameras to remove the blind spot noted at the Inquest. It should be noted that the purpose of these cameras is to monitor the number of people within the poolside environment as identified in HSG179. The images from these newly positioned cameras will be available to view on the monitor at reception.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 4 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure all existing employees complete the mandatory water-safety awareness module.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has introduced a new module on its Learning Management System on water safety awareness, which will be mandatory for all employees of the Company. The Company will ensure that all existing employees complete this by 31 October 2018.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review emergency action procedures and conduct regular documented drills covering multiple emergencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As noted above, the Company requires all of its new and existing employees to undertake a documented Workplace Induction Checklist, where they will be given a guided tour of their site to ensure that they are aware of the location and use of the building’s emergency and life saving apparatus. The Company will also review its Emergency Action Procedures (“EAP”) and ensure that its employees participate in regular documented drills. The Company’s new Health & Safety Compliance Manager will audit these centrally on a quarterly basis from 1 October 2018.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Changes to policies and procedures were deferred pending the inquest and investigations by the Metropolitan Police and London Borough of Camden.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Pending the outcome of the inquest, and investigations by the Metropolitan Police and the London Borough of Camden, the Company was advised not make any changes to its policies and procedures. Changes will now be implemented at both Maida Vale and across the Company where necessary, in the light of the concerns that have been raised.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The unauthorised pool-cleaning method was considered neither inherently dangerous nor causative of the death, and was viewed as an isolated occurrence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prior to the incident, the Board of Directors of Bannatyne Fitness Limited (“the Company”) were unaware that the pool at Maida Vale had been cleaned in this unauthorised manner. Steps have now been taken across all of the Company’s sites to ensure that pools are not cleaned using this method. It is understood however that this was an isolated occurrence and not commonplace in the Company’s other sites. For the record however, the Company wishes to state that the evidence given at the inquest did not show, certainly to the Company’s satisfaction, that this method of cleaning, whilst not acceptable, was “inherently dangerous”. Indeed, the pool had been cleaned at Maida Vale in this way for a number of years without incident, and as the evidence confirmed, it played no part whatsoever in Mr Al Hirsi’s death.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 1 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Assess the swimming competency of existing employees.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 October 2018.
  2. 2

    Employ Health and Safety Compliance and Learning and Development Managers to strengthen training and compliance.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 October 2018.
  3. 3

    Add swimming-competency assessment to recruitment procedures and use it when allocating responsibilities.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 October 2018.
  4. 4

    Remove references to RLSS techniques from club documentation.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 October 2018.
  5. 5

    Launch an online Learning Management System for employee training.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 October 2018.
  6. 6

    Establish and widen the remit of the Water Users Group to address water-safety procedures.

    Stated by Bannatyne Fitness LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 October 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess the swimming competency of existing employees.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has updated its recruitment processes and introduced a new question on its CV Supplement Application Form in order to determine the swimming competency of its new employees, which can then be utilised when allocating responsibilities. The Company will also ascertain the swimming competency of its existing employees by 14 October 2018.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 1 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Employ Health and Safety Compliance and Learning and Development Managers to strengthen training and compliance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In January 2018, the Company employed two new members of staff; a Health & Safety Compliance Manager (who was previously employed by the Company’s Primary Authority) and a Learning & Development Manager to improve its training and compliance. Subsequent to this, the Company procured and, in May 2018, launched a new online Learning Management System. In order to enhance its employees’ existing knowledge, all staff are currently undertaking mandatory training modules.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add swimming-competency assessment to recruitment procedures and use it when allocating responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has updated its recruitment processes and introduced a new question on its CV Supplement Application Form in order to determine the swimming competency of its new employees, which can then be utilised when allocating responsibilities. The Company will also ascertain the swimming competency of its existing employees by 14 October 2018.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 1 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remove references to RLSS techniques from club documentation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has removed references to RLSS techniques from the Club’s documentation. This was an unfortunate error. In September 2017 the Company set up a Water Users Group consisting of representatives of the Company’s general managers, regional operations managers, regional estates managers, the Company’s board of directors and external stakeholders/suppliers. The Company has widened the scope of the Water Users Group’s remit and will review and update the Company’s procedures in relation to this area by 31 March 2019.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch an online Learning Management System for employee training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In January 2018, the Company employed two new members of staff; a Health & Safety Compliance Manager (who was previously employed by the Company’s Primary Authority) and a Learning & Development Manager to improve its training and compliance. Subsequent to this, the Company procured and, in May 2018, launched a new online Learning Management System. In order to enhance its employees’ existing knowledge, all staff are currently undertaking mandatory training modules.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish and widen the remit of the Water Users Group to address water-safety procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Company has removed references to RLSS techniques from the Club’s documentation. This was an unfortunate error. In September 2017 the Company set up a Water Users Group consisting of representatives of the Company’s general managers, regional operations managers, regional estates managers, the Company’s board of directors and external stakeholders/suppliers. The Company has widened the scope of the Water Users Group’s remit and will review and update the Company’s procedures in relation to this area by 31 March 2019.”

Source location

2018-0265-Response-by-Bannatyne-Fitness-Limited
Page 5 · response
Published 11 October 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026