PFD report

Paul Moroney · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Feb 2015•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Unavailability of records of previous oxygen levels on readmission
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable documentation and communication of patients’ oxygen requirements
  2. Failure to monitor oxygen saturations before discharge after oxygen therapy
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable monitoring of oxygen saturation during clinical care
  3. Failure to record oxygen saturations during hospital care
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care recordsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable monitoring of oxygen saturation during clinical care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Oxygen saturations were monitored and recorded during the hospital attendance, contrary to the concern that they were not.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of records of previous oxygen levels on readmission

Wider context from the report

“3. When he was re-admitted to the hospital there was no record available to the staff about his previous oxygen levels. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care; Unreliable documentation and communication of patients’ oxygen requirements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to monitor oxygen saturations before discharge after oxygen therapy

Wider context from the report

“2. Having been put on oxygen in the hospital, this was discontinued and he was sent home without his Oxygen saturations being monitored ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes; Unreliable monitoring of oxygen saturation during clinical care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record oxygen saturations during hospital care

Wider context from the report

“1. Whilst at the hospital on the first occasion, no oxygen saturations were monitored or recorded ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records; Unreliable monitoring of oxygen saturation during clinical care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to monitor oxygen saturations during hospital care

Wider context from the report

“1. Whilst at the hospital on the first occasion, no oxygen saturations were monitored or recorded ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable monitoring of oxygen saturation during clinical care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Oxygen saturations were monitored and recorded during the hospital attendance, contrary to the concern that they were not.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Whilst at the hospital on the first occasion, no oxygen saturations were monitored or recorded.”

Source location

2015-0043-Response-by-Tameside-Hospital-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 4 February 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026