PFD report

Ricky Crosher and Matthew Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 May 2026•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
19

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to retain evidence pertinent to deaths
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to retain safety-critical source records and evidence
  2. Failure to ensure a safe and productive working relationship between prison and healthcare staff
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures
  3. Failure to maintain an appropriately staffed and resourced Safer Custody function
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient resourcing of prison self-harm prevention functions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.15

  1. Action

    Maintain Head of Healthcare leadership, cross-team meeting participation, strategic planning, and competent deputy cover to support integrated working.

    Stated by Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2026.
  2. Action

    Attend daily ACCT reviews with prison staff to identify prisoners who may require additional support.

    Stated by Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2026.
  3. Action

    Operate a joint Duty Manager Rota providing a senior-manager contact during core hours for resolving or escalating prison-healthcare issues.

    Stated by Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to retain evidence pertinent to deaths

Wider context from the report

“5. Failure to retain evidence pertinent to the death ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to retain safety-critical source records and evidence.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure a safe and productive working relationship between prison and healthcare staff

Wider context from the report

“6. Failure to ensure a safe and productive working relationship between prison and healthcare staff ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe interoperability between prison custody and healthcare procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain an appropriately staffed and resourced Safer Custody function

Wider context from the report

“1. Failure to have in place an appropriately staffed and resourced Safer Custody function ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient resourcing of prison self-harm prevention functions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide a safe Care and Separation Unit meeting expected policy and minimum standards of decency

Wider context from the report

“3. Failure to provide a safe Care and Separation Unit which adhered to expected policy and minimum standards of decency ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Persistent failure to maintain a robust system for learning from deaths

Wider context from the report

“4. Persistent failure to have in place a robust system for learning from deaths ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to learn from deaths through systematic review.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain a robust system for managing the safer custody telephone line

Wider context from the report

“2. Failure to have in place a robust system for managing the safer custody telephone line ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain Head of Healthcare leadership, cross-team meeting participation, strategic planning, and competent deputy cover to support integrated working.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our Head of Healthcare plays a key role in facilitating integrated working practices between healthcare and prison teams. They are a core member of, and consistent attendee at, key meetings at the prison including a new Tri-partite Meeting, which deals with issues concerning safer custody, security, and drug strategy, and the Local Delivery Board, whose members also include NHS England and the Local Authority. A member of the strategic leadership team, the Head of Healthcare has also contributed to an integrated two-year strategy for the prison. If the head of healthcare is unable to attend (e.g., due to annual leave or training), then a suitably competent colleague deputises on their behalf to ensure continuity of services provided and sustained improved working relationships between the Trust and HMP Governor(s).”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Attend daily ACCT reviews with prison staff to identify prisoners who may require additional support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Members of our healthcare team contribute to a range of meetings with prison staff including the Prison Council, the Specialist Interventions meeting, and two new meetings – the ‘Top 30 Most Violent’ meeting, and Segregation meeting. The latter two meetings have been put in place to embed strategies for reducing violence across the prison, and to safely manage transitions between ‘normal location’ and the ‘segregation unit’. Members of our team now attend daily ACCT reviews with prison staff enabling early identification of those that may require additional support.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a joint Duty Manager Rota providing a senior-manager contact during core hours for resolving or escalating prison-healthcare issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Beyond meetings, we have also collaborated with the prison team to establish a Duty Manager Rota. This provides a single point of contact for both prison and healthcare staff during core hours to a senior manager to resolve issues that may arise or to ensure they are escalated to the appropriate organisation for resolution where this is not possible.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Host Governor-grade prison colleagues in healthcare staff briefings at least monthly to reinforce integrated working.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have welcomed Governor-grade colleagues from the prison team into healthcare staff briefings on at least a monthly basis, which helps reinforce the integrated approach between prison and healthcare teams we know from experience to be the most successful.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participate in prison-healthcare meetings, including violence-reduction and segregation meetings, to support safer custody and transitions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Members of our healthcare team contribute to a range of meetings with prison staff including the Prison Council, the Specialist Interventions meeting, and two new meetings – the ‘Top 30 Most Violent’ meeting, and Segregation meeting. The latter two meetings have been put in place to embed strategies for reducing violence across the prison, and to safely manage transitions between ‘normal location’ and the ‘segregation unit’. Members of our team now attend daily ACCT reviews with prison staff enabling early identification of those that may require additional support.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Manage, download and securely retain death-in-custody CCTV footage under a local protocol to prevent overwriting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Access to CCTV footage for Death in Custody purposes is managed by the Safety Team who are responsible for the identification, downloading and secure retention of relevant footage to ensure it is not overwritten. All footage is obtained, and retained, in line with a local protocol.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Select, train and rotate Care and Separation Unit staff to support safe management of complex behaviours and prisoner needs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All members of operational staff assigned to work within the CSU are subject to a formal selection process where they must demonstrate their ability to deal with complex behaviours, whilst building and maintaining constructive and professional relationships with prisoners. Successful staff receive additional operational training to further develop their skills in recognising and responding to the diverse needs of the CSU population. CSU staff are rotated from the unit after a maximum of three years to maintain effectiveness and wellbeing.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct daily healthcare-prison briefings and structured handovers to improve continuity of care and information sharing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your sixth concern is in relation to collaborative working between HMP Lowdham Grange and healthcare. In July 2025 Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust assumed responsibility of HMP Lowdham Grange’s healthcare provider. Since this change in provider communication and working relationships between parties has improved significantly. Healthcare representatives attend the daily morning briefing and provide updates on any issues arising from the previous day. In addition, a structured daily handover takes place between healthcare and prison staff to ensure continuity of care and effective information sharing.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete and ringfence the Safer Custody Safety team to maintain consistent visibility and support for vulnerable prisoners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your first concern is around staffing and resource within the Safer Custody function at HMP Lowdham Grange. As of March 2026, the Safety team now has a full complement of staff, and to enable the team to be consistently visible across the establishment, the resource has been ringfenced, meaning that staff cannot be redeployed to carry out alternative routine duties. This ensures the staff in the team have the opportunity to actively engage with the most vulnerable prisoners and ensure that appropriate support is consistently provided.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct weekly Duty Governor assurance checks of the Care and Separation Unit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to the above CSU staffing structure the Duty Governor also completes weekly assurance checks to ensure oversight at senior management level. This weekly assurance visit allows for engagement with staff and prisoners and ensures that the unit is being managed as expected, and in line with HMPPS policy.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a Prevention of Future Deaths meeting to review learning recommendations, raise actions and verify their effective implementation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your fourth concern is in relation to lessons learnt from deaths in custody at HMP Lowdham Grange. In October 2024 the Governor of HMP Lowdham Grange introduced a Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) meeting where recommendations arising from Early Learning Reviews, Prisons and Probation Ombudsman (PPO) investigations and Regulation 28 reports are regularly reviewed and actions raised. Assurance checks are conducted on all actions once completed to ensure that recommendations have been fully embedded and are operating effectively within the establishment.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement an electronic central repository for prisoner records with controlled access, document tracking, retrieval and secure sharing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your fourth concern relates to the retention of evidence pertinent to a death in custody. In November 2024 a system was introduced whereby all prisoner records are stored electronically and the database acts as a central repository for all relevant documentation, enabling the establishment to collate, manage and securely share documentation with external stakeholders. The introduction of this approach ensures that all documentation is”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish the Care and Separation Unit staffing structure with senior custodial oversight and designated operational staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your third concern relates to the Care and Separation Unit (CSU) provision, which is used to manage and support more complex prisoners. Since August 2024 the running of the CSU has been overseen by a Governor supported by a Custodial Manager, a Supervising Officer, and a team of Band 3 officers.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Upgrade and operate the Safer Custody telephone line with dedicated message checks, recording, retention and review of calls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Safety team are also responsible for the management of the Safer Custody telephone line, which prisoners can call if they need some support. This telephone system was upgraded in March 2026 so that it no longer operates as a standalone system, and calls are now routed to a telephone located within the team’s office, with a designated member of the team responsible for checking messages multiple times throughout the day. All calls are recorded in a logbook which is regularly reviewed by Safety officers, and appropriate action”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appoint an Inquest and PFD Lead to coordinate PFD responses and oversee implementation and sustainment of learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, in April 2026 HMP Lowdham Grange appointed an Inquest and PFD Lead who is responsible for coordinating the prison’s response to PFD matters and for providing oversight and assurance that learning is implemented and sustained across the establishment.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Continue pursuing healthcare service improvements and strong working relationships with the prison Governor and wider prison team.

    Stated by Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 July 2026.
  2. 2

    Designate at least two daily Healthcare Officers to facilitate prisoner access to healthcare appointments.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation Service and Lowdham Grange PrisonStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2026.
  3. 3

    Provide daily mental health participation in ACCT reviews and maintain referral pathways for mental health, healthcare and substance misuse support.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation Service and Lowdham Grange PrisonStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2026.
  4. 4

    Increase healthcare staffing levels to enhance healthcare provision within the establishment.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation Service and Lowdham Grange PrisonStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 July 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue pursuing healthcare service improvements and strong working relationships with the prison Governor and wider prison team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since taking over as provider of the healthcare service at HMP Lowdham Grange, we have made significant improvements to the service and its relationship with the prison. As a learning organisation, we will continue to pursue improvement opportunities and a strong working relationship with our partners including the prison Governor and the wider prison team.”

Source location

Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Designate at least two daily Healthcare Officers to facilitate prisoner access to healthcare appointments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HMP Lowdham Grange also detail a minimum of two operational members of staff every day to be designated Healthcare Officers. These officers move around the establishment facilitating the movement of prisoners who are attending healthcare appointments in line with the individual wing regime, supporting the efficient delivery of healthcare services and improving prisoner access to care. There has also been an increase in healthcare staffing levels, enhancing the provision of care within the establishment.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide daily mental health participation in ACCT reviews and maintain referral pathways for mental health, healthcare and substance misuse support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A member of the mental health team now attends ACCT reviews on a daily basis, contributing to the review process and helping to identify prisoners who may require additional support. Furthermore, there are clear and effective referral pathways in place for mental health, primary healthcare, and substance misuse services, ensuring that prisoners can access appropriate support in a timely manner.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase healthcare staffing levels to enhance healthcare provision within the establishment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HMP Lowdham Grange also detail a minimum of two operational members of staff every day to be designated Healthcare Officers. These officers move around the establishment facilitating the movement of prisoners who are attending healthcare appointments in line with the individual wing regime, supporting the efficient delivery of healthcare services and improving prisoner access to care. There has also been an increase in healthcare staffing levels, enhancing the provision of care within the establishment.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 3 · response
Published 28 July 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026