PFD report

Jillian Anne Steedman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Oct 2025•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
13

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
19

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised13

  1. Lack of information sharing between professionals involved in care and treatment
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff
  2. Failure to complete discharge care plans, risk assessment and procedures
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable care-planning processesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  3. Failure to learn lessons from the death
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to learn from deaths through systematic review
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.14

  1. Action

    Review information-sharing protocols for collaboration with professionals in other organisations.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2025.
  2. Action

    Address the importance of recording information in care-plan sections through staff meetings, supervision and audit.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2025.
  3. Action

    Hold a post-Inquest debrief with Community and Crisis Response teams to share learning about information sharing.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 October 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Essex County Council is responsible for responding to concerns about placement appropriateness and updating the section 117 care plan.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of information sharing between professionals involved in care and treatment

Wider context from the report

“(1) There was a lack of information sharing between professionals involved in the care and treatment of Jillian Steedman who was a complex mental health patient with a long history of treatment resistant mental disorder. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete discharge care plans, risk assessment and procedures

Wider context from the report

“(4) The mental health Trust staff involved in the discharge and community care of Mrs Steedman were put on notice by a clinical lead on 16 March 2023 that the care plans, risk assessment and procedures relevant to the discharge had not been completed and were required in addition to the integrated plan that was attached to the email. These were never completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable care-planning processes; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to learn lessons from the death

Wider context from the report

“(14) There was an absence of a Council investigation and confusion as to which organisation should take the lead following Mrs Steedman’s death and then dispute before the inquest on the Investigation Report provided by the mental health Trust at the inquest. This caused concerns that lessons have not been learned. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to learn from deaths through systematic review.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Out-of-date information for aftercare planning, placement and risk assessment

Wider context from the report

“(11) The information for the aftercare planning and assessment presented for placement and risk for Mrs Steedman placed before the panel was significantly out of date. There was no review and the s117 care plan had not been updated since 13 September 2022. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording and checking of placement risk information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review placement appropriateness following crisis

Wider context from the report

“(8) The appropriateness of the placement was not reviewed following a crisis on 15 April 2023 just a few days after admission. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a contact list in the integrated plan

Wider context from the report

“(13) There was no contact list provided as part of the integrated plan, and Mrs Steedman requested that her social worker be contacted when she was in crisis on 15 April, and she stated she wanted to die and would throw herself in front of a train. This led to the call being diverted to mental health crisis and not directly to the FIRST team in accordance with the plan. The appropriateness of the placement in the care home was not reviewed at that time or when the care home management expressed concerns about Mrs Steedman’s risks of diverting a taxi. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable care-planning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete required reviews during distress and crises

Wider context from the report

“(7) Visiting professionals did not complete the required reviews necessary when Mrs Steedman was distressed and experiencing crises. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of visiting professionals to review care plans and risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“(6) The mental health Trust staff and the local authority social worker were visiting Mrs Steedman. The integrated plan required significant visits for Mrs Steedman initially every day with out of hours support available with a slow taper off over weeks. None of the visiting professionals asked to review the care plans or risk assessments and any such scrutiny would have revealed these necessary documents had not been completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of social worker to alert others to deficient or absent plans following crises

Wider context from the report

“(12) The social worker did not raise any alerts as to deficiencies or absence of plans following crises for Mrs Steedman. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inappropriate care-home placement for patient needs

Wider context from the report

“(5) Mrs Steedman was discharged to the care home on 11 April 2023 from mental health hospital following an admission of over 12 months and previously failed discharges. Evidence was heard Mrs Steedman was not appropriately placed in the Care Home based on her needs and the local authority were on notice that another care home had refused to admit Mrs Steedman due to her mental health. There was no review and the s117 care plan had not been updated since 13 September 2022. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure people are placed in care settings suitable for their needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review and update the s117 care plan

Wider context from the report

“(5) Mrs Steedman was discharged to the care home on 11 April 2023 from mental health hospital following an admission of over 12 months and previously failed discharges. Evidence was heard Mrs Steedman was not appropriately placed in the Care Home based on her needs and the local authority were on notice that another care home had refused to admit Mrs Steedman due to her mental health. There was no review and the s117 care plan had not been updated since 13 September 2022. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable care-planning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of Council investigation and clarity over investigative leadership

Wider context from the report

“(14) There was an absence of a Council investigation and confusion as to which organisation should take the lead following Mrs Steedman’s death and then dispute before the inquest on the Investigation Report provided by the mental health Trust at the inquest. This caused concerns that lessons have not been learned. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform the ongoing ECT consultant of mental health deterioration

Wider context from the report

“(2) Mrs Steedman’s consultant responsible for ongoing Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) was not informed of her mental health deterioration. Previous adjustments to the frequency of ECT had proved beneficial. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and respond to deteriorating mental health in service users; Unreliable circulation of safety-critical mental health information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review information-sharing protocols for collaboration with professionals in other organisations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have strengthened our governance by reviewing our information-sharing protocols with specific reference to how we work with professionals in other organisations. We have introduced structured communication methods for handovers and shared care plans which we have made accessible to all involved professionals including care home and social care staff. We are working in a more collaborative culture through regular multidisciplinary team meetings which is supporting our patient’s safety and planning. The Trust has relooked at its named”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Address the importance of recording information in care-plan sections through staff meetings, supervision and audit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: Since Mrs Steedman’s death, the importance of recording information in the care-plan section has been addressed. This has included discussing in meetings with staff, supervision and audit.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a post-Inquest debrief with Community and Crisis Response teams to share learning about information sharing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: The Trust appreciates the need to ensure information sharing between professionals is carried out in a robust and timely manner. To share the learning on this point, a post-Inquest debrief was held with the Community and the Crisis Response Team teams to discuss the Inquest and the concerns raised with regards to information sharing.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Carry out joint EPUT-ECC work to improve patient-safety investigations and update the PSIRF Policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There has been joint work between EPUT and ECC that has led to an improvement in joint working on patients safety investigations, and this is also reflected in the updated PSIRF Policy”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss professional curiosity with teams, remind staff to review care-home paperwork and consult carers, and provide support sessions on asking appropriate questions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response: We refer to our reply above under concern 4 in respect of care plans and risk assessments. In addition, as part of team reflections in this matter, the importance of professional curiosity was discussed and the team were reminded that they should review care home paperwork (where access is possible) and also speak with carers within the home. Support sessions were provided on asking right questions using professional curiosity and how this would have given more opportunity to understand Mrs Steedman’s needs and risks, whilst acknowledging that the Care Home may in turn approach the Trust with regards to any information or support required.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share patient-safety learning through the lessons team with clinical and non-clinical staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response The Trust has shared learning through the lessons team available to all clinical and non clinical staff. Information regarding patient care is discussed robustly through MDT’s and supervision, Caseloads are reviewed through audit.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a Care Unit Incident Review Group and Patient Safety Lead role within the care unit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work is ongoing to increase the robustness of the patient safety incident reports, particularly around the setting of Terms of Reference which set the focus for the review. The Care Unit Incident Review Group and the establishment of the Patient Safety Lead role within the care unit has strengthened this process during 2025.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce structured handovers and shared care plans accessible to involved health, care-home and social-care professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have strengthened our governance by reviewing our information-sharing protocols with specific reference to how we work with professionals in other organisations. We have introduced structured communication methods for handovers and shared care plans which we have made accessible to all involved professionals including care home and social care staff. We are working in a more collaborative culture through regular multidisciplinary team meetings which is supporting our patient’s safety and planning. The Trust has relooked at its named”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a multi-agency Transfer of Care hub to discuss urgent-care pathway contacts and attribute follow-up actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response In this case the CRS assessed the needs of Mrs Steedman and identified that she needed support over the weekend. They were aware she was open to community services. The decision was taken to seek support from Sanctuary who were able to provide non-clinical support, thereby providing Mrs Steedman with another layer of support. There is now a multi agency Transfer of Care hub where any patient who has had contact with the Urgent Care Pathway will be discussed and a follow up action attributed.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 3 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review named-worker roles and responsibilities to strengthen accountability, and audit compliance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have strengthened our governance by reviewing our information-sharing protocols with specific reference to how we work with professionals in other organisations. We have introduced structured communication methods for handovers and shared care plans which we have made accessible to all involved professionals including care home and social care staff. We are working in a more collaborative culture through regular multidisciplinary team meetings which is supporting our patient’s safety and planning. The Trust has relooked at its named”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen patient-safety incident reports, particularly the robustness of Terms of Reference for reviews.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Work is ongoing to increase the robustness of the patient safety incident reports, particularly around the setting of Terms of Reference which set the focus for the review. The Care Unit Incident Review Group and the establishment of the Patient Safety Lead role within the care unit has strengthened this process during 2025.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with EPUT to strengthen its incident response framework, including safeguarding, investigation handling and early Adult Social Care involvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To ensure roles and responsibilities for investigating deaths are clear we have been working with our colleagues in EPUT to ensure that their Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) is robust. We have met with the EPUT lead in this area and have provided detailed comments on their PSIRF to ensure that safeguarding remains at the centre of the approach, patient safety investigations are appropriately dealt with, and, where Adult Social Care needs to be involved, we are engaged at the earliest opportunity. We will continue to work with EPUT as they further develop their PSIRF.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the Section 117 policy to improve care delivery and incorporate learning from the death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also been working with system partners to improve the governance arrangements that support mental health care in our administrative area and are presently working on a revision to the Section 117 policy so that it supports the effective delivery of care in this important area and incorporates the learning from Mrs Steedman’s sad death. This work is ongoing, but we anticipate it will be completed within the next six months.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake a full review of community mental health social work arrangements, including joint-working arrangements, to clarify roles and responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to this PFD, we will undertake a full review of our community mental health social work arrangements, including the existing arrangements supporting joint working, to ensure roles and responsibilities are clear. We expect this work to take place over the next year and we are committed to ensuring that the outcome of this work is safer with better coordinated support for those using the service.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Essex County Council is responsible for responding to concerns about placement appropriateness and updating the section 117 care plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Concern 5) Mrs Steedman was discharged to the care home on 11 April 2023 from mental health hospital following an admission of over 12 months and previously failed discharges. Evidence was heard Mrs Steedman was not appropriately placed in the Care Home based on her needs and the local authority were on notice that another care home had refused to admit Mrs Steedman due to her mental health. There was no review and the s117 care plan had not been updated since 13 September 2022”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Develop a more collaborative multidisciplinary working culture through regular multidisciplinary team meetings.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2025.
  2. 2

    Monitor the stated provisions to assess their contribution to patient safety and therapeutic care.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 October 2025.
  3. 3

    Continue proactively managing consent and documenting patient and family preferences through advance statements.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2025.
  4. 4

    Examine the operational configuration of the Approved Mental Health Professional service.

    Stated by Essex County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2025.
  5. 5

    Review policies governing delivery of Mental Health Act obligations.

    Stated by Essex County CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 October 2025.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The internal investigation could not be expanded to cover matters outside the agreed Terms of Reference without undermining the investigation framework.

    Stated by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a more collaborative multidisciplinary working culture through regular multidisciplinary team meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have strengthened our governance by reviewing our information-sharing protocols with specific reference to how we work with professionals in other organisations. We have introduced structured communication methods for handovers and shared care plans which we have made accessible to all involved professionals including care home and social care staff. We are working in a more collaborative culture through regular multidisciplinary team meetings which is supporting our patient’s safety and planning. The Trust has relooked at its named”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 1 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor the stated provisions to assess their contribution to patient safety and therapeutic care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I hope that I have provided some reassurances around the steps that we have taken to address the issues of concern contained within your report. We know there is an acute need to embed and effect change, hence we will monitor the above provisions to ensure these are contributing to our overall aim of keeping patients safe and delivering therapeutic care.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 5 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue proactively managing consent and documenting patient and family preferences through advance statements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, we are continuing to involve patients and families by managing consent proactively and documenting preferences through advance statements throughout the patient’s journey.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Examine the operational configuration of the Approved Mental Health Professional service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Critically the findings in this case, and in particular the recommendations set out in the PFD notice, have identified the need for us to take a detailed look at the operational delivery of care and support in this area. We have already started work by reviewing our policies associated with the delivery of our Mental Health Act obligations and are currently examining the operational configuration of our own Approved Mental Health Professional service, but we need to do more.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review policies governing delivery of Mental Health Act obligations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Critically the findings in this case, and in particular the recommendations set out in the PFD notice, have identified the need for us to take a detailed look at the operational delivery of care and support in this area. We have already started work by reviewing our policies associated with the delivery of our Mental Health Act obligations and are currently examining the operational configuration of our own Approved Mental Health Professional service, but we need to do more.”

Source location

Response from Essex County Council
Page 2 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The internal investigation could not be expanded to cover matters outside the agreed Terms of Reference without undermining the investigation framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Response There is an important need to afford impartiality to the author / the family in respect of such reports in relation to agreed Terms of Reference (TOR). The internal report is prepared for learning purposes, with the TORs being agreed with families in advance (where they wish to engage with the investigation process). This then sets the framework of the review. It would be inappropriate for this framework to be influenced by any other process, in terms of what should or should not be covered within the investigation.”

Source location

Response from Essex Partnership University
Page 4 · response
Published 14 October 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026