PFD report

Jane Elizabeth Wadsworth · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Jul 2023•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to ensure administration and escalation of missed antibiotic doses
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable management of medication doses not takenPart of recurring concern: Unsafe medication administration
  2. Failure to discuss cases with the specialist Liver team
  3. Lack of clear clinical ownership of specialist consultation actions
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical task management and follow-through
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Issue a staff poster explaining how to prevent medication omissions and obtain unavailable medicines.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  2. Action

    Amend the Critical Care Unit daily review chart to document clearly who referred patients to the Liver Unit and when.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  3. Action

    Provide each ward with an allocated pharmacist and pharmacy technician to review treatment sheets daily and support timely medication ordering.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 July 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    The concerns fall under the Trust’s remit rather than NHS England’s functions.

    Stated by NHS EnglandOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure administration and escalation of missed antibiotic doses

Wider context from the report

“1. Mrs Wadsworth missed three doses of antibiotics prescribed to treat her infection according to the evidence given to the inquest. This did not appear to have been escalated and there was no clear explanation regarding this occurring other than that her cannula may not have been in place and there was a delay in a doctor being available to reinsert one; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable management of medication doses not taken; Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to discuss cases with the specialist Liver team

Wider context from the report

“6. Following her first admission to ICU there was a note that Mrs Wadsworth’s case should be discussed with a specialist Liver team. There was no evidence available to the inquest that such a discussion had taken place. It was not entirely clear on the evidence precisely which clinician was to take ownership of the action. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear clinical ownership of specialist consultation actions

Wider context from the report

“6. Following her first admission to ICU there was a note that Mrs Wadsworth’s case should be discussed with a specialist Liver team. There was no evidence available to the inquest that such a discussion had taken place. It was not entirely clear on the evidence precisely which clinician was to take ownership of the action. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical task management and follow-through.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of effective consultant input into inpatient care

Wider context from the report

“2. The evidence before the inquest was that on her admission over Christmas/New Year there was no effective consultant input into her care; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of Critical Care Outreach assessment to address complex non-NEWS2 indicators of ICU need

Wider context from the report

“4. The alternative support available to ward based staff and possible route into ICU according to the evidence given at inquest was via the Critical Care Outreach team. That team is staffed primarily by nurses and its key focus is on presentation linked to NEWS2 scores according to the evidence given to the inquest. Mrs Wadsworth’s case was a complex one involving issues relating to her liver function and kidney function rather than just her NEWS2 scores and it was unclear if the Critical Care Outreach Team were best placed to assess her need for ICU support; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct effective doctor-to-doctor discussion of potential ICU involvement

Wider context from the report

“3. The junior doctor involved in her care felt that ICU involvement/input would be beneficial. The evidence was that there did not seem to be any doctor to doctor discussion of this. The inquest heard evidence that this was one way a patient could be transferred to ICU. It was unclear why there had not been such a discussion and whether in periods such as Christmas/ New Year where there were fewer consultants available the system worked effectively. This was not a situation where there had been a ward based ceiling of care put in place and ultimately Mrs Wadsworth was treated by ICU but was extremely unwell at that point and did not respond to that intervention at that point; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to escalate deteriorating patients for ICU involvement.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability and insufficient capacity of the Critical Care Outreach team

Wider context from the report

“5. The inquest heard that on the date of one referral that team was not in any event available to the ward and the nurse who should have undertaken the role had been redeployed elsewhere in the trust and there was no capacity to fill that role; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable critical-care outreach for deteriorating patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a staff poster explaining how to prevent medication omissions and obtain unavailable medicines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust recognise that there is an overall percentage of medication doses which are omitted for a ‘non-valid clinical reason’. This means that unsigned doses would be recorded under this category (along with any medication doses omitted due to lack of availability). In the last completed audit the percentage of medication doses omitted for a ‘non-valid clinical reason’ averaged 4% of all prescribed doses. This audit is part of the Trust’s standard audit cycle and the results are fed back to the multidisciplinary Medicines Safety Group. One of the actions from the last audit was to issue a new poster which highlights to all staff how to avoid omissions in medication- this includes information of how to access medication if unavailable within the clinical area.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the Critical Care Unit daily review chart to document clearly who referred patients to the Liver Unit and when.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust acknowledge that the clinical documentation recorded within the Critical Unit was not clear with regards to who and when Mrs Wadsworth was referred to the Liver Unit. In response to this the Critical Care Unit have amended their daily review chart to provide additional clarity on this point and that this is documented in a more comprehensive way.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 6 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide each ward with an allocated pharmacist and pharmacy technician to review treatment sheets daily and support timely medication ordering.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To provide further support for inpatient areas each ward has a Ward based Pharmacy Team. Each ward area has an allocated ward pharmacist and pharmacy technician who evaluate individual treatment sheets on a daily basis. They form a key element of the multidisciplinary team caring for our patients. Pharmacy presence on the wards supports the accurate prescribing and administration of medication. They also ensure timely ordering of medications which do not form part of the routine medication stocked within the ward area.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit omitted medication doses through pharmacy, ward quality-assurance and accreditation processes, reporting results and sharing learning for improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust continue to focus on improvement in relation to missed doses of medication. There is an established program of medication audits which are reported to the Trust’s Medication Safety Group. The Medication Group meet bi-monthly and has a multidisciplinary membership. At present the Pharmacy Department perform an annual snapshot retrospective audit which focuses on omitted/unsigned doses. The audit covers inpatient areas and looks at any medication doses which are not administered as prescribed and the documented reasons for this. The most recent audit was presented to Trust Medicines Safety Group on 28/04/23.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Redesign the medication kardex to highlight time-critical medicines and streamline ward medication-ordering and emergency supply arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust medication kardex has been redesigned to place greater emphasis on time critical medications. Pharmacy systems for ordering medications to the ward have been streamlined and the Trust also has an emergency medication cupboard and an on-call pharmacy for obtaining medications out of hours. I attach a copy of the template of the updated medicines kardex and the PowerPoint slides to support the new medicine chart for your consideration and information.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain a critical-care referral policy defining consultant-to-consultant and urgent medical-registrar referral pathways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Admission and Discharge Policy for Critical Care clearly sets out referral pathways for those patients who may require a higher level of care leading critical care due to their current clinical condition. The referral pathway is in line with national guidance (National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths- NCEPOD, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence- NICE, National Patient Safety Agency-NPSA, and Royal College Physicians) that the optimal referral pathway is consultant to consultant. However the policy describes that in more critical instances where any delay may be detrimental to the patient then a referral may come from training grade doctors. It is expected that this be a medical registrar (i.e. medical middle grade either on-call or responsible for the patient).”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 5 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain a 24-hour, seven-day MERIT service staffed by senior anaesthetic clinicians to provide emergency critical-care support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has an established Critical Care Outreach Team which is comprised of a number of highly skilled and experienced critical care nursing colleagues. The service is available on a 24 hour, seven day a week basis. In addition to this the Trust also implemented a MERIT (Medical Emergency and Rapid Intubation Team) team as part of its response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Although the Trust, like other nations have stood down many of the supportive measures implemented in response to the pandemic, the organisation has continued with the MERIT Team. The MERIT Team is staffed by senior anaesthetic colleagues, including Consultant level from 08:30 to 18:00, and from 18:00 to 08:30 this is staffed by a middle grade anaesthetist.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 5 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide medication-omission induction and refresher training, with medication-management assessment for nurses new to the Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The issue of omitted doses is covered in the nursing induction training that the Pharmacist delivers. Every nurse receives this training at the point of joining the Trust. This training can also be accessed as a refresher course. Every nurse new to the Trust also receives a medication management assessment undertaken by the Ward Manager which evidences safer practice in keeping with Trust policy. This is recorded in the individual’s personnel file and a copy sent to the learning and development department.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The concerns fall under the Trust’s remit rather than NHS England’s functions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The matters of concern raised in your Report come under the remit of Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (hereafter “the Trust”), who are therefore the appropriate organisation to respond to the concerns raised. I am however grateful to you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention. The concerns have been shared with my relevant regional Quality colleagues in the North West, who are engaging with Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (the responsible commissioning body for Greater Manchester) about the issues raised.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust is the appropriate organisation to respond, with the Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board responsible for commissioning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The matters of concern raised in your Report come under the remit of Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (hereafter “the Trust”), who are therefore the appropriate organisation to respond to the concerns raised. I am however grateful to you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention. The concerns have been shared with my relevant regional Quality colleagues in the North West, who are engaging with Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (the responsible commissioning body for Greater Manchester) about the issues raised.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The consultant on-call rota had no staffing deficit during the admission, contrary to concerns about ineffective consultant input over Christmas and New Year.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust operates a Consultant on-call rota which includes all weekends and bank holidays throughout the year. The on-call Consultant’s remit is one of assisting their Urgent Care consultant colleagues in the review of new patients who have been admitted to the Acute Medical Unit and also to perform the review and care planning of any acutely unwell medical patients located in the medical wards across the Hospital if required.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 3 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing outreach absence procedures, staffing oversight and MERIT support provided alternative safeguards when an outreach practitioner was redeployed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“the appropriate medical plan to be put in place. At the time of Mrs Wadsworth’s admission the Outreach Practitioner had been allocated to an inpatient area to mitigate risk following a short notice staff absence. However despite this the ward team could have also considered contacting the MERIT team for advice and guidance for Mrs Wadsworth.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 6 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Engage with Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board about the reported patient safety issues.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  2. 2

    Discuss the Regulation 28 Report through the Regulation 28 Working Group to share learning across NHS regions.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  3. 3

    Share the reported patient safety concerns with relevant regional Quality colleagues.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  4. 4

    Deliver IV cannulation induction, simulation and supervised clinical competency assessment for registered staff.

    Stated by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 July 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage with Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board about the reported patient safety issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The matters of concern raised in your Report come under the remit of Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (hereafter “the Trust”), who are therefore the appropriate organisation to respond to the concerns raised. I am however grateful to you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention. The concerns have been shared with my relevant regional Quality colleagues in the North West, who are engaging with Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (the responsible commissioning body for Greater Manchester) about the issues raised.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the Regulation 28 Report through the Regulation 28 Working Group to share learning across NHS regions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your Report will also be discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the reported patient safety concerns with relevant regional Quality colleagues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The matters of concern raised in your Report come under the remit of Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (hereafter “the Trust”), who are therefore the appropriate organisation to respond to the concerns raised. I am however grateful to you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention. The concerns have been shared with my relevant regional Quality colleagues in the North West, who are engaging with Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (the responsible commissioning body for Greater Manchester) about the issues raised.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver IV cannulation induction, simulation and supervised clinical competency assessment for registered staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During Trust induction, all registered members of staff undergo clinical induction training which includes intravenous (IV) cannulation. Registered members of staff is asked to complete an e-learning package and present evidence of the completion of training by way of a certificate to the Trust Training team. On receipt of the certificate the Trust training team support simulated practice on an artificial arm to illustrate and reinforce practice under direct supervision. Once completed the registered member of staff is provided with a competency document which is taken into clinical practice. Competency is completed following assessment in the clinical setting by another competent colleague. This skill is essential to role for all Registered Nurses working within Acute Care and the IV Therapy Team.”

Source location

Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026