PFD report

Yohannes Kidane · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Sep 2014•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of sufficient staffing for effective ACCT observations
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
  2. Insufficient night staffing to enable staff comfort breaks
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient prison staffing capacity for safe regime operation and incident responsePart of recurring concern: Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours
  3. Insufficient night staffing to provide healthcare and other prisoner needs
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient carePart of recurring concern: Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Meet with G4S and National Offender Management Service representatives to address non-clinical night duties, including cell-bell responses and ACCT observations.

    Stated by Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 September 2014.
  2. Action

    Liaise with Birmingham Community Healthcare Trust and G4S regarding night staffing levels and additional overnight support.

    Stated by Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 September 2014.
  3. Action

    Continue pursuing Commissioner funding for an additional Ward 2 staff member.

    Stated by Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 September 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.6

  1. Position

    G4S and the National Offender Management Service will provide a separate response concerning non-clinical night duties and ACCT observations.

    Stated by Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of sufficient staffing for effective ACCT observations

Wider context from the report

“(2) I am concerned that the ability to undertake effective ACCT observations is compromised by the lack of sufficient staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient night staffing to enable staff comfort breaks

Wider context from the report

“(3) When I asked how staff took breaks at night I was told staff did not take breaks during the night. I am concerned about the impact this would have on the care and wellbeing of prisoners and on the staff. Staff must need to take comfort breaks throughout the night which would add an additional burden on the already stretched staffing levels. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient prison staffing capacity for safe regime operation and incident response; Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient night staffing to provide healthcare and other prisoner needs

Wider context from the report

“(1) The healthcare department has 2 wards with 15 patients on each ward. The evidence presented at the inquest confirmed that at night the healthcare wards are staffed by 1 nurse per ward and 1 prison officer who is shared between both wards. Evidence confirmed there were a number of prisoners on ward 2 who required ACCT observation plus other prisoners requiring attention. At the time only 1 nurse was present as the Prison officer was on the other ward. I am concerned the wards have insufficient staff at night to provide for all the healthcare and other needs of prisoners. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care; Insufficient safe staffing and senior cover out of hours.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet with G4S and National Offender Management Service representatives to address non-clinical night duties, including cell-bell responses and ACCT observations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have met with G4S and representatives from the National Offenders Management Service as the evidence at the inquest identified that a significant part of the duties during the night are non-clinical, for example responding to cell bells, general enquiries and undertaking ACCT observations. I understand that they will be providing a separate response to you.”

Source location

2014-0392-Response-by-Birmingham-Solihull-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 3 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Liaise with Birmingham Community Healthcare Trust and G4S regarding night staffing levels and additional overnight support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to respond to the concerns that you have raised, the Trust has liaised with Birmingham Community Healthcare Trust (who provide physical healthcare on Ward 1 of the healthcare centre) and G4S who provide healthcare prison officers in the”

Source location

2014-0392-Response-by-Birmingham-Solihull-NHS
Page 1 · response
Published 3 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue pursuing Commissioner funding for an additional Ward 2 staff member.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am disappointed to report that we asked our Commissioner to attend two meetings regarding funding of an extra staff member for Ward 2. They declined to attend”

Source location

2014-0392-Response-by-Birmingham-Solihull-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 3 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

G4S and the National Offender Management Service will provide a separate response concerning non-clinical night duties and ACCT observations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have met with G4S and representatives from the National Offenders Management Service as the evidence at the inquest identified that a significant part of the duties during the night are non-clinical, for example responding to cell bells, general enquiries and undertaking ACCT observations. I understand that they will be providing a separate response to you.”

Source location

2014-0392-Response-by-Birmingham-Solihull-NHS
Page 4 · response
Published 3 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Funding approval for an extra Ward 2 staff member has not progressed because the Commissioner declined meetings; the matter will continue to be pursued.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am disappointed to report that we asked our Commissioner to attend two meetings regarding funding of an extra staff member for Ward 2. They declined to attend”

Source location

2014-0392-Response-by-Birmingham-Solihull-NHS
Page 3 · response
Published 3 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Healthcare Commissioners are responsible for funding additional prison healthcare staff and are invited to address the staffing concern.

Verbatim wording from the response

“healthcare centre. The Trust has also forwarded a copy of your letter to the Commissioner responsible for funding healthcare services within the prison.”

Source location

2014-0392-Response-by-Birmingham-Solihull-NHS
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The first concern falls within the Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust’s responsibility, and that Trust will respond separately.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You have raised three matters of concern. I am aware that the first of which concerns matters for Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust who will be responding separately. I will therefore address the second and third in turn.”

Source location

2014-0392-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 3 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing night staffing, including a prison custody officer and emergency assistance arrangements, is considered adequate for ACCT observations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Adequacy of Night Staffing for the conduct of ACCT observations The night staffing level for HMP Birmingham was reviewed when responsibility for its operation was transferred to G4S, and NOMS is satisfied that it is acceptable. G4S has chosen to deploy a Prison Custody Officer (PCO) to patrol the healthcare centre at night, and this is beyond the public sector benchmark which would require the use an Operational Support Grade (OSG) for this purpose. This allows extra flexibility, as a PCO is trained and authorised to perform additional duties, such as to unlock cell doors if required.”

Source location

2014-0392-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 3 September 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing night staffing and break-cover arrangements are considered sufficient, with additional staff available for high ACCT numbers or continuous supervision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Staff breaks at night The Night Orderly Officer arranges cover for breaks with the staff on duty at the beginning of each night shift. If there is a particularly high number of prisoners subject to Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) process in one location, the Night Orderly Officer may choose to locate an additional member of staff in that area. This is not common practice as night staffing levels are assessed as sufficient, but it is an option that can be used. If there”

Source location

2014-0392-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 3 September 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026