Sophie Ann Dean · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Sep 2024•Inner North London

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to provide complete information about treatment options before consent
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to discuss patient care options and decisionsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment
  2. Failure to ensure that consultation notes fully record discussions and assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
  3. Failure to obtain treatment consent without pressuring families
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. University College London Hospital (UCLH

    Record subspecialty agreement to implement the amended consent policy through local governance committees.

  2. University College London Hospital (UCLH

    Amend the consent policy to require additional consultant input, Best Interests Meetings where applicable, and documentation of operative and conservative-treatment risks.

  3. University College London Hospital (UCLH

    Audit implementation of the amended consent policy within six months.

  4. University College London Hospital (UCLH

    Audit ward-round notes within 12 months to verify compliance with the agreed documentation standard.

  5. University College London Hospital (UCLH

    Incorporate the PFD learning into subspecialty Trust induction covering ward-round documentation and the consent policy within three months.

  6. University College London Hospital (UCLH

    Establish a subspecialty-standard ward-round note with agreed minimum documentation requirements using the electronic record template.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide complete information about treatment options before consent

Wider context from the report

“3) The on-call surgeon used language such as having “pushed the family” into agreeing to surgery on 24 August 2023. There was also evidence that not all options/possibilities were discussed with Miss Dean’s parents prior to their consenting to surgery. The evidence was that Miss Dean’s parents may not have fully understood the rationale for surgery or the possibility of conservative management of the issue, prior to the laparotomy on 24 August 2023. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to discuss patient care options and decisions; Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure that consultation notes fully record discussions and assessments

Wider context from the report

“1) Consultant’s undertaking ward rounds allowed very junior doctors to make the entry from these consultations in the patient records. While there is no concern about this per se, there were numerous key factors missing from these notes. I am concerned that the notes did not fully represent the discussions and assessments that took place, which creates risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain treatment consent without pressuring families

Wider context from the report

“3) The on-call surgeon used language such as having “pushed the family” into agreeing to surgery on 24 August 2023. There was also evidence that not all options/possibilities were discussed with Miss Dean’s parents prior to their consenting to surgery. The evidence was that Miss Dean’s parents may not have fully understood the rationale for surgery or the possibility of conservative management of the issue, prior to the laparotomy on 24 August 2023. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Omissions from medical records

Wider context from the report

“2) There were other omissions from the medical records for Miss Dean’s admission. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Record subspecialty agreement to implement the amended consent policy through local governance committees.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Documentation of speciality agreement to implement this new policy will occur through local governance committees. This will be audited within six months.”

Source location

Response from UCLH
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the consent policy to require additional consultant input, Best Interests Meetings where applicable, and documentation of operative and conservative-treatment risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The consent policy has been amended to state that where there is agreed to be a high risk of surgical mortality (determined to be a 10% risk) in patients unable to provide informed consent who are undergoing an emergency surgical procedure, a second consultant opinion will be sought and the second consultant will document in the electronic record their opinion. In non-emergency situations, a Best Interests Meeting will convene and the outcome documented. In all cases, documentation will include the risks of performing the surgery, and the converse risks of doing nothing and continuing conservative treatment only.”

Source location

Response from UCLH
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit implementation of the amended consent policy within six months.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Documentation of speciality agreement to implement this new policy will occur through local governance committees. This will be audited within six months.”

Source location

Response from UCLH
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit ward-round notes within 12 months to verify compliance with the agreed documentation standard.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Each subspecialty team will decide on a standard ward round note to include an agreed minimum requirement for information. This may include, for example, the last set of observations, most recent blood tests or radiology findings, and documentation of the senior doctor leading the ward round. UCLH uses an electronic healthcare record system that allows personalisation of a standard ward round template, which is available across workstations and mobile devices, to facilitate delivery. Each division has agreed to perform a notes audit within the next 12 months to ensure this standard is being upheld.”

Source location

Response from UCLH
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate the PFD learning into subspecialty Trust induction covering ward-round documentation and the consent policy within three months.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The learning from this PFD will be incorporated into Trust induction on a subspecialty level, to ensure the ward round documentation requirements are clear for future resident doctors and there is familiarity with the consent policy. This timeline for this is three months for completion.”

Source location

Response from UCLH
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a subspecialty-standard ward-round note with agreed minimum documentation requirements using the electronic record template.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Each subspecialty team will decide on a standard ward round note to include an agreed minimum requirement for information. This may include, for example, the last set of observations, most recent blood tests or radiology findings, and documentation of the senior doctor leading the ward round. UCLH uses an electronic healthcare record system that allows personalisation of a standard ward round template, which is available across workstations and mobile devices, to facilitate delivery. Each division has agreed to perform a notes audit within the next 12 months to ensure this standard is being upheld.”

Source location

Response from UCLH
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026