PFD report

Ellie Jane LONG · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Mar 2019•Norfolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to maintain timely disclosure of all relevant documents
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable disclosure of relevant evidence in formal proceedings
  2. Failure to sustain the priority of record keeping and disclosure requirements
  3. Failure to maintain full and contemporaneous electronic records
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Instruct all clinical services to review record-keeping and partner-agency communication practices.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 June 2019.
  2. Action

    Provide management assurance on actions taken to improve record keeping and partner-agency communication.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 June 2019.
  3. Action

    Deliver a learning session on clinicians’ regulatory, legal and professional responsibilities for record keeping and communication.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 June 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Operational managers are responsible for reviewing record-keeping and partner-agency communication practices and providing assurance of improvement actions.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain timely disclosure of all relevant documents

Wider context from the report

“1. Record keeping and Auditing of Record keeping a) Not all records were properly recorded on Lorenzo. Further, personal handwritten notes were made of some meetings which were not then reflected in the electronic records. Some of these notes only came to light during the inquest hearing. It is, of course, imperative that all staff recognise their obligations in respect of keeping full and contemporaneous electronic records and that full disclosure of all relevant documents is made in a timely fashion before the inquest commences. This avoids potential delay in the inquest process and further distress to the family. b) Some action has been taken by NSFT in this respect, not least in that the team is now better resourced staff-wise. Further action has been and is being taken to ensure staff appreciate the importance of full record keeping. An audit of the records has been undertaken to ensure full compliance with record keeping requirements but this will only continue until 100% compliance has been achieved. c) Concern remains in that staff do change over time and matters raised now do not necessarily remain at the forefront of an individual’s mind, especially when under time pressure. Good record keeping is an integral part of any good service and must be second nature to all staff. It must be fully appreciated by all as “a vital component in the management of risk”. Further, record keeping has been raised elsewhere as a matter of concern within NSFT. d) I have concern that full record keeping and disclosure requirements will not remain a priority. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable disclosure of relevant evidence in formal proceedings.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to sustain the priority of record keeping and disclosure requirements

Wider context from the report

“1. Record keeping and Auditing of Record keeping a) Not all records were properly recorded on Lorenzo. Further, personal handwritten notes were made of some meetings which were not then reflected in the electronic records. Some of these notes only came to light during the inquest hearing. It is, of course, imperative that all staff recognise their obligations in respect of keeping full and contemporaneous electronic records and that full disclosure of all relevant documents is made in a timely fashion before the inquest commences. This avoids potential delay in the inquest process and further distress to the family. b) Some action has been taken by NSFT in this respect, not least in that the team is now better resourced staff-wise. Further action has been and is being taken to ensure staff appreciate the importance of full record keeping. An audit of the records has been undertaken to ensure full compliance with record keeping requirements but this will only continue until 100% compliance has been achieved. c) Concern remains in that staff do change over time and matters raised now do not necessarily remain at the forefront of an individual’s mind, especially when under time pressure. Good record keeping is an integral part of any good service and must be second nature to all staff. It must be fully appreciated by all as “a vital component in the management of risk”. Further, record keeping has been raised elsewhere as a matter of concern within NSFT. d) I have concern that full record keeping and disclosure requirements will not remain a priority. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain full and contemporaneous electronic records

Wider context from the report

“1. Record keeping and Auditing of Record keeping a) Not all records were properly recorded on Lorenzo. Further, personal handwritten notes were made of some meetings which were not then reflected in the electronic records. Some of these notes only came to light during the inquest hearing. It is, of course, imperative that all staff recognise their obligations in respect of keeping full and contemporaneous electronic records and that full disclosure of all relevant documents is made in a timely fashion before the inquest commences. This avoids potential delay in the inquest process and further distress to the family. b) Some action has been taken by NSFT in this respect, not least in that the team is now better resourced staff-wise. Further action has been and is being taken to ensure staff appreciate the importance of full record keeping. An audit of the records has been undertaken to ensure full compliance with record keeping requirements but this will only continue until 100% compliance has been achieved. c) Concern remains in that staff do change over time and matters raised now do not necessarily remain at the forefront of an individual’s mind, especially when under time pressure. Good record keeping is an integral part of any good service and must be second nature to all staff. It must be fully appreciated by all as “a vital component in the management of risk”. Further, record keeping has been raised elsewhere as a matter of concern within NSFT. d) I have concern that full record keeping and disclosure requirements will not remain a priority. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to share relevant information and communicate with external agencies

Wider context from the report

“2. Communication with External Agencies a) An initial full, updating letter was sent to Ellie’s GP. However no further updating information was sent. A letter was written providing updating information, but this was not sent. No further updating information was sent to the GP by telephone, letter or email. b) The evidence heard is that efforts were made to contact the school by telephone. However, the school had no record of any such calls. There is no evidence of email or written correspondence or further telephone calls in an effort to communicate with the school. c) It is accepted by the Trust that sharing of relevant information is necessary. NSFT has indicated it will “remind staff of the importance of recording efforts to share information/maintain communication”. d) Sharing of information and communication with external agencies is a matter which has been raised with NSFT on previous occasions. The importance of “recording efforts to share information ...” may not be sufficient to prevent future deaths. It is the importance of sharing information and communicating with external agencies that should be addressed here. Recording of information is dealt with at Point 1 above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care; Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Instruct all clinical services to review record-keeping and partner-agency communication practices.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All clinical services have been instructed to review their working practice in respect of record keeping and communication with partner agencies. Responsibility for this rests with the operational managers who will provide assurance of the actions taken to improve performance.”

Source location

2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide management assurance on actions taken to improve record keeping and partner-agency communication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All clinical services have been instructed to review their working practice in respect of record keeping and communication with partner agencies. Responsibility for this rests with the operational managers who will provide assurance of the actions taken to improve performance.”

Source location

2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver a learning session on clinicians’ regulatory, legal and professional responsibilities for record keeping and communication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Supporting this is a learning session to be delivered by the Head of Patient Safety and Safeguarding and the Legal Services Manager. The session will have a specific focus on the regulatory, legal and professional responsibilities each clinician holds with respect to record keeping and communication.”

Source location

2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor intervention effectiveness through audit, user feedback and quality and safety reviews.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust will gain assurance these interventions are working through a number of indicators. This will include audit, user feedback and the outcomes of quality and safety reviews. To support an effective assurance system, the Trust is implementing a new governance structure enabling a combined and tiered approach that will provide the culture and conditions for improvement.”

Source location

2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review working practices for record keeping and communication with partner agencies across clinical services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All clinical services have been instructed to review their working practice in respect of record keeping and communication with partner agencies. Responsibility for this rests with the operational managers who will provide assurance of the actions taken to improve performance.”

Source location

2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operational managers are responsible for reviewing record-keeping and partner-agency communication practices and providing assurance of improvement actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All clinical services have been instructed to review their working practice in respect of record keeping and communication with partner agencies. Responsibility for this rests with the operational managers who will provide assurance of the actions taken to improve performance.”

Source location

2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Introduce new Clinical Directors to strengthen clinical and service leadership for safe and effective services.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 June 2019.
  2. 2

    Implement a new governance structure providing combined, tiered assurance for quality and safety improvement.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 June 2019.
  3. 3

    Introduce Patient Participation Leads for each locality to support quality, patient experience and learning from serious incidents.

    Stated by Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 June 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce new Clinical Directors to strengthen clinical and service leadership for safe and effective services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is strengthening its clinical and service leadership to ensure they have the necessary breadth of skills and resource to lead safe and effective services. Of particular note, the Trust will be introducing Patient Participation Leads for each locality, who will work alongside new Clinical Directors to lead the components of quality and patient experience. The Trust is finalising the recruitment to these roles which will be fully effective from September 2019. A key function of this new approach will be the”

Source location

2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a new governance structure providing combined, tiered assurance for quality and safety improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust will gain assurance these interventions are working through a number of indicators. This will include audit, user feedback and the outcomes of quality and safety reviews. To support an effective assurance system, the Trust is implementing a new governance structure enabling a combined and tiered approach that will provide the culture and conditions for improvement.”

Source location

2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce Patient Participation Leads for each locality to support quality, patient experience and learning from serious incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is strengthening its clinical and service leadership to ensure they have the necessary breadth of skills and resource to lead safe and effective services. Of particular note, the Trust will be introducing Patient Participation Leads for each locality, who will work alongside new Clinical Directors to lead the components of quality and patient experience. The Trust is finalising the recruitment to these roles which will be fully effective from September 2019. A key function of this new approach will be the”

Source location

2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 June 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026