Jardine Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

On 12 and 13 March 2026, I heard the inquest in the death of Miss Jardine Williams, aged 29 years, at the time of her death on 24 March 2025. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest, where I returned a narrative conclusion, and found the cause of death to be 1(a) Hanging.

I found that Jardine Williams resided at Flat 2 Harraby Green Hall, Harraby Green Road, Carlisle, Cumbria. Miss Williams was employed as a mental health nurse at Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust.

Miss Williams had been experiencing a period of mental ill health, which had been exacerbated following the witnessing of an extremely traumatic incident at her place of work. Miss Williams had sought medical treatment for her mental health condition.

At 17.16 hours on 24 March 2025, Miss Williams made a 999 call which was answered by the North West Ambulance Service. In this call Miss Williams confirmed she had been experiencing worsening mental health problems and had suicidal thoughts, as well as a plan and an intention to carry out that plan. The 999 call was categorised as a category 3 call, with a planned response time of 120 minutes.

The 999 call was passed to Cumbria Health on Call (CHOC) and came into the CHOC system at 17.40 hours. CHOC attempted to contact Miss Williams on four occasions between 18.14 hours and 18.54 hours without success.

At 20.58 hours on 24 March 2025, an ambulance from the Northwest Ambulance Service arrived at Flat 2 Harraby Green Hall, Harraby Green Road, Carlisle, Cumbria and found that Miss Williams ████████
████████ Whilst Miss Williams died as a result of a deliberate act, her intent cannot be determined on the balance of probabilities.

It is not possible to determine, on the balance of probabilities, if earlier attendance by the Northwest Ambulance Service at Flat 2 Harraby Green Hall, would have altered this outcome.

As outlined above, I heard evidence that Miss Williams had made a 999 call which had been answered by the Northwest Ambulance Service (‘NWAS’) who, in turn passed the information to CHOC.

(1) I found that the flow of information and communication between NWAS and CHOC was unclear and at times appeared to be confused. The information passed to CHOC at the outset, following the 999 call, appeared to be limited and may not have provided the receiving handler with the full picture of the situation. I was concerned that full and accurate information was therefore not passing between NWAS and CHOC.

(2) Thereafter between 18.14 and 18.54 hours, 4 attempts were made by CHOC to call Miss Williams, but no successful contact was made. At 19.48 hours NWAS called CHOC for an update regarding Miss Williams. I heard evidence that as per the agreed procedure, a third and final attempt at contact would be made. By this stage however four unsuccessful attempts had already been made to contact Miss Williams, and the third attempt to contact her had been made at 18.25hours. I considered that the flow of information between CHOC and NWAS appeared to have confused on this issue.

At 20.43 hours a further call was made to CHOC from NWAS for an update on the case, and again it was confirmed that no successful contact had been made with Miss Williams. Therefore, the call was taken back by NWAS approximately 2 hours 18 minutes after the third unsuccessful attempt was made to contact Miss Williams. Thereafter, an ambulance attended Flat 2 Harraby Green Hall at 20.58 hours.

I did not find that there was a causative link between the call not being returned to NWAS after the third unsuccessful attempt to contact Miss Williams, and the eventual outcome. I was concerned that, in terms of the procedure, the call should have been returned by CHOC to NWAS after the third failed attempt to contact Miss Williams at 18.25 hours, but that the call was not returned to NWAS by CHOC until 20.43 hours.