PFD report

Michael Guy Hutchence · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Jun 2016•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Unnecessary transfers between hospital wards
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital bed management and allocation processes
  2. Shortage of Braun’s Frames for safe leg elevation
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable
  3. Failure to record accurate patient weights consistently
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably monitor patients' weights
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Undertake monthly live spot audits of 30 inpatient records to improve written-record quality during the electronic-record rollout.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 June 2016.
  2. Action

    Install and roll out an electronic patient record integrating healthcare information and standardising documentation and care pathways.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 June 2016.
  3. Action

    Merge D2 staff with the Short Stay Surgical Unit and increase weekend capacity to 32 patients, providing additional emergency capacity and redeploying spare staff to staffing gaps.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 June 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.5

  1. Position

    Critical-care patients were supervised by qualified staff, and the patient was never solely cared for by an unqualified nurse.

    Stated by Stockport NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unnecessary transfers between hospital wards

Wider context from the report

“1. For no other reason than the convenience of the hospital bed-managers, he was moved at least four times from ward to ward in the hospital. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital bed management and allocation processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Shortage of Braun’s Frames for safe leg elevation

Wider context from the report

“6. I was told that the ideal way of elevating a patient’s leg is by using a Braun’s Frame. There was (and apparently still is) a shortage of these within the hospital, such that his leg was at all times elevated by using pillows. This was a potential for causing or contributing to the formation of DVT’s. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record accurate patient weights consistently

Wider context from the report

“4. In addition to the above problem, the body weight was recorded on some occasions in metric and others in imperial weights. This can and does lead to confusion. On one page of the notes, the predicted weight was shown as 15stone 10lbs which was in fact the actual weight and NOT the predicted weight. For the purpose of the accurate delivery of many drugs including anti-coagulants, accurate weight recording is essential. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably monitor patients' weights.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to use a sufficiently refined method for anticoagulant dose assessment

Wider context from the report

“3. He was administered his anti-coagulant simply on the basis of his body weight. He weighed 99.8Kg and the difference between a daily dose of 40mg of Clexane and a twice daily dose of 40mg of Clexane is arbitrarily set at a body weight of 100Kg. Should there not be a rather more refined way of assessing the dose required? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe anticoagulant management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient availability of trained nursing staff

Wider context from the report

“5. There was a shortage of trained nurses in the hospital, and this may have led to at least one of the “ward moves”. Ward D2 was closed due to lack of staff. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide appropriately specialist and supervised nursing care

Wider context from the report

“2. The quality and accuracy of the nursing and medical notes left much to be desired and it was noted that he was cared for by non-specialist nurses on a number of occasions and even when he was in the I.T.U. he was looked after by a trainee nurse. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain accurate nursing and medical notes

Wider context from the report

“2. The quality and accuracy of the nursing and medical notes left much to be desired and it was noted that he was cared for by non-specialist nurses on a number of occasions and even when he was in the I.T.U. he was looked after by a trainee nurse. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide usable sterile surgical kits

Wider context from the report

“7. The patient was taken to theatre for the operation and this could not be started as the “kit” for the operation was found to have a non-sterile status as the outer wrapping had been breached. The operation was delayed whilst another kit was obtained but this was also found to be defective. The operation was then aborted and put off for a further two days, during which time the patient was immobile and the risk of DVT and PE was inevitably increased. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable pre-operative preparation and safety checks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake monthly live spot audits of 30 inpatient records to improve written-record quality during the electronic-record rollout.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The EPR will improve patient safety and outcomes by standardising pathways underpinned by best practice, it will remove issues relating to the illegibility of written records and will also assist with the completion of important documents, as the system will employ a ‘force function’, meaning the record cannot be left incomplete. The roll out for the system will be completed in 2017. In the meantime we will continue to try to improve our written records by undertaking monthly ‘live’ spot audits of 30 inpatient records across the wards.”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install and roll out an electronic patient record integrating healthcare information and standardising documentation and care pathways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is currently in the process of installing an electronic patient record (EPR) system, which is a computerised version of the entire healthcare record. Instead of hospital staff using a mixture of paper and electronic records, information will be available to them online in one place. We already use a variety of electronic systems to help staff look after our patients, but the EPR will bring all this information together.”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Merge D2 staff with the Short Stay Surgical Unit and increase weekend capacity to 32 patients, providing additional emergency capacity and redeploying spare staff to staffing gaps.

Verbatim wording from the response

“D2 (an elective inpatient ward) was closed following NHS England advice for us not to undertake any elective work, apart from day case work, due to winter bed pressures throughout the NHS at that time. As a result of this we merged the staff from D2 with SSSU which was open 7 days a week and increased to 32 patients at a weekend, giving us extra capacity for emergencies. Any spare staff were utilised to support gaps in staffing on other areas.”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue an awareness drive requiring staff to record patient weight and height using metric measurements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is currently an ongoing awareness drive to ensure all staff are recording weight and height in the metric format.”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Purchase and provide four additional Braun frames for Ward D1, increasing the hospital total to eight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can advise that four new Braun frames have since been purchased and were delivered to Ward D1 on 25 July 2016; we now have 8 in total. There is still a potential that outlying trauma patients, in the very busy winter period, may still have pillows utilised as an elevation method.”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Critical-care patients were supervised by qualified staff, and the patient was never solely cared for by an unqualified nurse.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2) The quality and accuracy of the nursing and medical notes left much to be desired and it was noted that Mr Hutchence was cared for by non-specialist nurses on a number of occasions and even when he was in the I.T.U. he was looked after by a trainee nurse.”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Evidence and manufacturer guidance do not support routine anticoagulant dose adjustments for overweight patients without evidence of efficacy and safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3) Mr Hutchence was administered his anti-coagulant simply on the basis of his body weight. He weighed 99.8 Kg and the difference between a daily dose of 40 mg. of Clexane and a twice daily dose of 40mg of Clexane is arbitrarily set at a body weight of 100 Kg. Should there not be a rather more refined way of assessing the dose required?”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Proceeding with surgery when instrument-tray sterility was uncertain was unacceptable, requiring postponement until safe equipment was available.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Mr. Hutchence was scheduled for surgery on the trauma list for open reduction and internal fixation of fractured left tibia and fibula on 19th January 2016. It has not been possible to identify a particular cause for the breaches in the wrappings. Great care and attention is given to maintaining the integrity and sterility of the instrument tray wrappings. It is standard theatre practice that careful and thorough checking of every instrument tray wrapping is undertaken by the theatre practitioner prior to use. In this case, the routine checking identified the breaches and an appropriate action was taken to re-sterilise the instrument trays.”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

There is no direct evidence that limb elevation reduces venous thromboembolism, and the elevation method does not affect that risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6) I was told the ideal way of elevating a patient’s leg is by using a Braun’s frame. There was (and apparently still is) a shortage of these within the hospital such that Mr Hutchence’s leg was at all times elevated by using pillows. This was a potential for causing or contributing to the formation of D.V.T’s”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ward moves were often necessary to create bed capacity and meet emergency access targets, rather than being solely for bed-manager convenience.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1) For no other reason, other than the convenience of hospital bed managers, Mr. Hutchence was moved at least four times from ward to ward within the hospital.”

Source location

2016-0228-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 20 June 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026