PFD report

Sheldon Marshall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Aug 2021•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Insufficient senior clinical input into policy-holder medical management
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care
  2. Lack of clarity about relative responsibility for patients’ overall medical management between Mayday Assistance Limited and air ambulance providers
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain clear clinical responsibility for patient carePart of recurring concern: Failure to provide continuity of patient carePart of recurring concern: Unsafe coordination of shared care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Conduct virtual weekly ward rounds to review patients of concern and formally review complex cases presenting clinical or logistical challenges.

    Stated by Mayday Group LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 August 2021.
  2. Action

    Implement an internal escalation process for very sick and seriously ill patients to the senior clinical team.

    Stated by Mayday Group LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 August 2021.
  3. Action

    Expand senior clinical capacity by employing two doctors, including a Medical Director and an additional doctor available on call.

    Stated by Mayday Group LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 August 2021.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient senior clinical input into policy-holder medical management

Wider context from the report

“Senior clinical input at Mayday Assistance Limited At the conclusion of the inquest the court found that there was an omission on the part of Mayday Assistance Limited to ensure that their Medical Director was aware of, and providing clinical leadership in relation to, Mr Marshall, from at least 22 November 2017. Whilst the court was not persuaded that this omission caused or contributed to the particular facts of Mr Marshall’s death, the Coroner is concerned that the level of senior clinical input at Mayday Assistance Limited remains insufficient and may have a negative impact on the medical management of current and future policy holders and therefore presents a risk of future deaths. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity about relative responsibility for patients’ overall medical management between Mayday Assistance Limited and air ambulance providers

Wider context from the report

“The medical management of patients once Mayday Assistance Limited has instructed an Air Ambulance provider During the course of the inquest the court heard evidence that on 24 November 2017 Mayday Assistance Limited instructed Tyrol Air Ambulance (TAA) to repatriate Mr Marshall from Nepal to the UK. The court heard that the repatriation to the UK did not ultimately go ahead as Mr Marshall was not considered fit enough to undergo the flight on the dates that TAA had an available aircraft. The court found that during the period from 24 November to 4 December 2017 there was a lack of clarity as between Mayday Assistance Limited and TAA with regards to who was responsible for Mr Marshall’s overall medical management, and as a result neither Mayday Assistance Limited nor TAA were monitoring Mr Marshall’s ongoing condition with a view to reviewing and advising on (i) whether the UK was the appropriate destination for Mr Marshall and identifying potential regional alternatives and (ii) the overall risk/benefits of him remaining in Nepal versus being transferred to another country in the region. Whilst the court was not persuaded that this omission caused or contributed to the particular facts of Mr Marshall’s death, the Coroner is concerned that this lack of clarity remains today, not only as between Mayday Assistance Limited and TAA but potentially as between Mayday Assistance Limited and other air ambulance providers, which presents a risk of future death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain clear clinical responsibility for patient care; Failure to provide continuity of patient care; Unsafe coordination of shared care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct virtual weekly ward rounds to review patients of concern and formally review complex cases presenting clinical or logistical challenges.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is now a virtual weekly ward round during which all patients presenting with any concerns are reviewed. This is attended by Dr ████████ (RGN this / Paramedic Practitioner) and ████████ (Operations Manager). During this weekly meeting there is a formal review of the management of any complex cases completed that provided clinical or logistical challenges.”

Source location

2021-0276-Response-from-Mayday-Group-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 26 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement an internal escalation process for very sick and seriously ill patients to the senior clinical team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Mayday now have in place an internal escalation process, which ensures escalation for VSIL and SIL (very sick and seriously ill patients) to the senior clinical team. We attach the Escalation Matrix for medical management now in place.”

Source location

2021-0276-Response-from-Mayday-Group-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 26 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Expand senior clinical capacity by employing two doctors, including a Medical Director and an additional doctor available on call.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Mayday Assistance now employs two doctors rather than only one. The Medical Director is now Dr ████████, who took up the post when Dr ████████ stepped down in June 2018. A further doctor, Dr ████████, has also been appointed to provide senior clinical input. We attach the CVs of both Dr ████████ and Dr ████████. A doctor is always available to assist the Medical Team in decision making and discussion with third parties when required. There is no set weekly working pattern and both doctors are available on call. Dr ████████ currently has no other clinical commitments.”

Source location

2021-0276-Response-from-Mayday-Group-Ltd_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 26 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish Air Ambulance Support Agreements with providers to clarify responsibilities and promote close working relationships on all cases.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An Air Ambulance Support Agreement is now in place with Mayday's Air Ambulance providers, as attached, to ensure that both parties are clear regarding their responsibilities and to ensure that there is a close working relationship on all cases. If a company declines to sign our agreement and cannot provide one with similar protocols they will be removed from Mayday's provider list.”

Source location

2021-0276-Response-from-Mayday-Group-Ltd_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 26 August 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026