PFD report

Philip Anthony ELLIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Nov 2021•County Durham and Darlington

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to undertake serious incident reviews of supervision failures
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes
  2. Failure to supervise service users to prevent unsupervised departure from service premises
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Restrict clients from spending time away from the project until achieving at least three months' abstinence.

    Stated by Free the WayStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 November 2021.
  2. Action

    Require staff or suitably established recovering residents to escort clients leaving the project.

    Stated by Free the WayStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 November 2021.
  3. Action

    Closely monitor treatment entrants and house clients at higher overdose risk in continuously staffed accommodation.

    Stated by Free the WayStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 November 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Because clients live in community accommodation, they remain free to leave, and such departures cannot be mitigated.

    Stated by Free the WayUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to undertake serious incident reviews of supervision failures

Wider context from the report

“That the deceased was able to leave the service premises unsupervised and obtain drugs in breach of the services own rules. The evidence at the Inquest indicated that there had not been a serious incident review undertaken by Free the Way into the failures of supervision in this case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to supervise service users to prevent unsupervised departure from service premises

Wider context from the report

“That the deceased was able to leave the service premises unsupervised and obtain drugs in breach of the services own rules. The evidence at the Inquest indicated that there had not been a serious incident review undertaken by Free the Way into the failures of supervision in this case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Restrict clients from spending time away from the project until achieving at least three months' abstinence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While Phillip was allowed to return to his home to collect clothing, prior to re-entering treatment with us, and this was unaccompanied this has certainly raised issues and something that needs to be addressed in the future. Phillip was also allowed to leave the project, in the company, of another resident and in accordance with our peer-support model of care, however, this could also have provided Phillip with the opportunity of purchasing drugs and paraphernalia and another issue of concern for the future. Based on this evidence Free the Way will be introducing the following measures, with immediate effect, to ensure that any re-occurrence of such an incident is significantly reduced:”

Source location

2021-0380-Response-from-Free-the-Way_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require staff or suitably established recovering residents to escort clients leaving the project.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While Phillip was allowed to return to his home to collect clothing, prior to re-entering treatment with us, and this was unaccompanied this has certainly raised issues and something that needs to be addressed in the future. Phillip was also allowed to leave the project, in the company, of another resident and in accordance with our peer-support model of care, however, this could also have provided Phillip with the opportunity of purchasing drugs and paraphernalia and another issue of concern for the future. Based on this evidence Free the Way will be introducing the following measures, with immediate effect, to ensure that any re-occurrence of such an incident is significantly reduced:”

Source location

2021-0380-Response-from-Free-the-Way_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Closely monitor treatment entrants and house clients at higher overdose risk in continuously staffed accommodation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While Phillip was allowed to return to his home to collect clothing, prior to re-entering treatment with us, and this was unaccompanied this has certainly raised issues and something that needs to be addressed in the future. Phillip was also allowed to leave the project, in the company, of another resident and in accordance with our peer-support model of care, however, this could also have provided Phillip with the opportunity of purchasing drugs and paraphernalia and another issue of concern for the future. Based on this evidence Free the Way will be introducing the following measures, with immediate effect, to ensure that any re-occurrence of such an incident is significantly reduced:”

Source location

2021-0380-Response-from-Free-the-Way_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Escort relapsed clients to their homes to collect property before re-entering treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While Phillip was allowed to return to his home to collect clothing, prior to re-entering treatment with us, and this was unaccompanied this has certainly raised issues and something that needs to be addressed in the future. Phillip was also allowed to leave the project, in the company, of another resident and in accordance with our peer-support model of care, however, this could also have provided Phillip with the opportunity of purchasing drugs and paraphernalia and another issue of concern for the future. Based on this evidence Free the Way will be introducing the following measures, with immediate effect, to ensure that any re-occurrence of such an incident is significantly reduced:”

Source location

2021-0380-Response-from-Free-the-Way_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Because clients live in community accommodation, they remain free to leave, and such departures cannot be mitigated.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While we will adhere stringently to the above objectives, as we are a quasi-residential treatment facility where clients reside in accommodation units within the community then they are still free to leave at any”

Source location

2021-0380-Response-from-Free-the-Way_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 November 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Exclude clients who leave without staff approval and terminate their tenancies and licence agreements.

    Stated by Free the WayStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 November 2021.
  2. 2

    Conduct regular room checks, searches and urine screening for all clients.

    Stated by Free the WayStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 November 2021.
  3. 3

    Search all client property before clients return to treatment.

    Stated by Free the WayStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 November 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Exclude clients who leave without staff approval and terminate their tenancies and licence agreements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“time and we are unable to mitigate such events. However, should clients leave the project without the approval of staff they will not be allowed to return to the project and their tendencies and license agreements will be terminated with immediate effect.”

Source location

2021-0380-Response-from-Free-the-Way_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct regular room checks, searches and urine screening for all clients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While Phillip was allowed to return to his home to collect clothing, prior to re-entering treatment with us, and this was unaccompanied this has certainly raised issues and something that needs to be addressed in the future. Phillip was also allowed to leave the project, in the company, of another resident and in accordance with our peer-support model of care, however, this could also have provided Phillip with the opportunity of purchasing drugs and paraphernalia and another issue of concern for the future. Based on this evidence Free the Way will be introducing the following measures, with immediate effect, to ensure that any re-occurrence of such an incident is significantly reduced:”

Source location

2021-0380-Response-from-Free-the-Way_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 November 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Search all client property before clients return to treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While Phillip was allowed to return to his home to collect clothing, prior to re-entering treatment with us, and this was unaccompanied this has certainly raised issues and something that needs to be addressed in the future. Phillip was also allowed to leave the project, in the company, of another resident and in accordance with our peer-support model of care, however, this could also have provided Phillip with the opportunity of purchasing drugs and paraphernalia and another issue of concern for the future. Based on this evidence Free the Way will be introducing the following measures, with immediate effect, to ensure that any re-occurrence of such an incident is significantly reduced:”

Source location

2021-0380-Response-from-Free-the-Way_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 November 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026