PFD report

Patricia Violet PALIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Jun 2018•Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
5

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 5 recipients

Stated actions
14

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Failure to provide Shropdoc personnel with access to referring patients’ GP records
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably transfer medical records between healthcare organisationsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable consolidation and access to patients’ cross-service clinical risk information
  2. Failure to remove leg bandages for full top-to-toe examination
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to perform clinically indicated physical examinations
  3. Lack of a programme to replace unavailable A&E Doctors
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate contingency planning for safe patient care during staffing shortages
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.10

  1. Action

    Use Sepsis Champions as Emergency Department links to support staff education with the Critical Care Outreach Team.

    Stated by the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
  2. Action

    Write to practices encouraging discussion of enhanced Summary Care Records with patients who have chronic illness.

    Stated by SHROPSHIRE & TELFORD LOCAL MEDICAL COMMITTEEStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
  3. Action

    Review Emergency Department trolleys and assess a trial trolley containing equipment, antibiotics and fluids for immediate sepsis care.

    Stated by the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 July 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Short-notice Emergency Department staffing gaps cannot always be covered because of workforce fragility and limited available doctors and agency staff.

    Stated by the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide Shropdoc personnel with access to referring patients’ GP records

Wider context from the report

“1. Shropdoc personnel, be that Doctors or Urgent Care Practitioners are not able to access the referring patients GP records. This meant that they did not have the full picture of Patricia’s past medical history before administering any advice or treatment. This is not a one off isolated incident and applies to every case that is referred to Shropdoc. Evidence was given at the inquest from the Shropdoc Urgent Care Practitioners that it would have assisted them. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably transfer medical records between healthcare organisations; Unreliable consolidation and access to patients’ cross-service clinical risk information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to remove leg bandages for full top-to-toe examination

Wider context from the report

“4. Whilst there was a general awareness of the dangers of sepsis from the Shropdoc and Hospital witness evidence; a. Red flag signs of sepsis were missed. b. Leg bandages were not removed to allow full top to toe examination. c. Sepsis six care bundles were not followed in accordance with guidelines. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to perform clinically indicated physical examinations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a programme to replace unavailable A&E Doctors

Wider context from the report

“2. During the evening of the 1st October 2017, there were only two A&E Doctors on duty (a third had telephoned in sick ). Too few Doctors were therefore on duty in general to cover patient needs and there did not seem to be in place a programme for trying to get a third Doctor to replace the Doctor who had telephoned in sick. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate contingency planning for safe patient care during staffing shortages.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow Sepsis Six care bundles in accordance with guidelines

Wider context from the report

“4. Whilst there was a general awareness of the dangers of sepsis from the Shropdoc and Hospital witness evidence; a. Red flag signs of sepsis were missed. b. Leg bandages were not removed to allow full top to toe examination. c. Sepsis six care bundles were not followed in accordance with guidelines. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of prescribed drugs in the A&E department

Wider context from the report

“3. I heard evidence that a prescribed drug Ertapenem was not in stock within the A&E department and that led to a delay of some two hours and twenty five minutes until administration. Other suitable alternative drugs were available but not considered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide required medication promptly when clinically needed; Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify red flag signs of sepsis

Wider context from the report

“4. Whilst there was a general awareness of the dangers of sepsis from the Shropdoc and Hospital witness evidence; a. Red flag signs of sepsis were missed. b. Leg bandages were not removed to allow full top to toe examination. c. Sepsis six care bundles were not followed in accordance with guidelines. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient A&E Doctor staffing to cover patient needs

Wider context from the report

“2. During the evening of the 1st October 2017, there were only two A&E Doctors on duty (a third had telephoned in sick ). Too few Doctors were therefore on duty in general to cover patient needs and there did not seem to be in place a programme for trying to get a third Doctor to replace the Doctor who had telephoned in sick. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care; Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider suitable alternative drugs when the prescribed drug is unavailable

Wider context from the report

“3. I heard evidence that a prescribed drug Ertapenem was not in stock within the A&E department and that led to a delay of some two hours and twenty five minutes until administration. Other suitable alternative drugs were available but not considered. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use Sepsis Champions as Emergency Department links to support staff education with the Critical Care Outreach Team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Sepsis Champions have also been chosen to be a link within the ED, and they will work closely with the Critical Care Outreach Team to continue the education and provide support for all staff within the ED. The Team are also in the process of working with the Medical Teams to ensure that all the Doctors are trained in Sepsis recognition and treatment.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to practices encouraging discussion of enhanced Summary Care Records with patients who have chronic illness.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I’m afraid I don’t have figures for the proportion of Shropshire and Telford patients with severe frailty who have an enhanced SCR. The CCGs may be able to provide these. Clearly, GPs have a responsibility to encourage uptake in this group. In addition, there seems little doubt that there are potential benefits in all patients classed as frail having an enhanced SCR, and that could be extended further. As far as I am aware, there are no plans by the Government to extend the requirement beyond those with severe frailty. GP workload and manpower issues limit the capacity of practices to do more but I will write to practices encouraging GPs to discuss the benefits of allowing an enhanced SCR with all their patients with chronic illness.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 7 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review Emergency Department trolleys and assess a trial trolley containing equipment, antibiotics and fluids for immediate sepsis care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Alongside this we are reviewing the trolleys in the department, with the possibility of trialling a trolley that will allow for us to put everything into the trolley for immediate care of the septic patient, this includes antibiotics and fluids. The existing trolley in place does not carry everything required for immediate care.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share root-cause investigation learning with staff and improve communication about medicine availability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Doctor prescribing the Ertapenem was not made aware that it was not available in the department, so was unable to consider an alternative. The outcomes of the Root Cause Investigation were discussed with the team for learning to ensure communication is improved in the future. Furthermore, the drug is now stocked in the Emergency Department, to avoid recurrence in the future.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver sepsis education across both Emergency Departments, including recognition, screening, Sepsis Six and reference-card reinforcement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, given that Mrs Palin’s delays were based in the Emergency Department I wish to you update you on the work which has taken place and the on-going plans to improve sepsis care in ED specifically. Our Critical Care Outreach Team commenced a programme of sepsis education in both Emergency Departments, as of last week; to date 20 staff have been trained. The education is targeting all clinical staff in the department; however this is limited to availability of staff due to work load. The training sessions are taking place daily, 7 days a week. The feedback has been really positive from all staff. The areas covered within the teaching session are recognition using visual signs, as well as recognition using the Sepsis screening tool. The team then look at the Sepsis Six pathway in detail and discuss the importance of delivering this within the one hour time frame.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and implement a revised sepsis screening tool in the Surgical Assessment Unit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Root Cause Analysis was shared with the staff involved in order for lessons to be learnt by the individuals involved in Mrs Palin’s care. This was reflected by Dr ████████ who attested to this in the Inquest hearing. In addition to this the Trust has carried out work on Sepsis and much more is planned through the Trust. In the last few years our organisation partnered with Virginia Mason Hospital in America, in order to improve patient safety and care. As part of this, one of the Value Streams has focused on Sepsis and improving care for patients with this condition. Some of the improvements which are being rolled out include:”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a bespoke sepsis trolley in the Surgical Assessment Unit for timely treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• New Sepsis Trolley – the SAU team introduced a bespoke sepsis trolley to store all of the items required to provide timely treatment for patients who are diagnosed with sepsis generating greater efficiency and reliability based on ‘set up reduction’.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a Patient Group Directive enabling specified senior nurses to deliver sepsis fluids and antibiotics within one hour when a doctor is unavailable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are also developing a Patient Group Directive which will allow Senior Band 5 Nurses and Band 6 Nurses to deliver the fluids and antibiotics within the one hour required time frame in the event that a Doctor is not available to meet the demands of the one hour time frame. This is a huge step for us and one that has been welcomed by all of the nursing staff within the ED. Both ED’s have Practice Education Nurses who will continue to ensure all staff are up to date with their sepsis training.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with medical teams to train all doctors in sepsis recognition and treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Sepsis Champions have also been chosen to be a link within the ED, and they will work closely with the Critical Care Outreach Team to continue the education and provide support for all staff within the ED. The Team are also in the process of working with the Medical Teams to ensure that all the Doctors are trained in Sepsis recognition and treatment.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Stock ertapenem in the Emergency Department to prevent treatment delays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Doctor prescribing the Ertapenem was not made aware that it was not available in the department, so was unable to consider an alternative. The outcomes of the Root Cause Investigation were discussed with the team for learning to ensure communication is improved in the future. Furthermore, the drug is now stocked in the Emergency Department, to avoid recurrence in the future.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Short-notice Emergency Department staffing gaps cannot always be covered because of workforce fragility and limited available doctors and agency staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust does have a process in place for trying to backfill vacant shifts in the Emergency Department. At the first instance we will attempt to contact our own doctors via the Departmental Consultants or Medical Staffing representative making contact. We will also advertise via external agencies at the same time to ensure that every attempt is made to fill the gap. I attach a copy of the flow charts used to backfill vacant shifts.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Partner with Virginia Mason Hospital through a sepsis-focused patient-safety value stream to improve sepsis care.

    Stated by the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
  2. 2

    Develop a sepsis information webpage on the Trust intranet.

    Stated by the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
  3. 3

    Deliver monthly sepsis awareness spotlights highlighting good practice across hospital wards.

    Stated by the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
  4. 4

    Provide a sepsis box in Ward 28 containing items needed for rapid diagnosis.

    Stated by the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 July 2018.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    GP workload and manpower constraints limit practices’ capacity to provide enhanced Summary Care Records beyond required groups.

    Stated by SHROPSHIRE & TELFORD LOCAL MEDICAL COMMITTEEUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Partner with Virginia Mason Hospital through a sepsis-focused patient-safety value stream to improve sepsis care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Root Cause Analysis was shared with the staff involved in order for lessons to be learnt by the individuals involved in Mrs Palin’s care. This was reflected by Dr ████████ who attested to this in the Inquest hearing. In addition to this the Trust has carried out work on Sepsis and much more is planned through the Trust. In the last few years our organisation partnered with Virginia Mason Hospital in America, in order to improve patient safety and care. As part of this, one of the Value Streams has focused on Sepsis and improving care for patients with this condition. Some of the improvements which are being rolled out include:”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a sepsis information webpage on the Trust intranet.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Critical Care Outreach Team have also developed a new Sepsis Web page on the Trust Intranet with information and links. On this the team will be doing a ‘Spotlight’ of the month to highlight good practice from various wards around the hospital to raise awareness of sepsis, this should keep sepsis awareness fresh and in the minds of everyone.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver monthly sepsis awareness spotlights highlighting good practice across hospital wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Critical Care Outreach Team have also developed a new Sepsis Web page on the Trust Intranet with information and links. On this the team will be doing a ‘Spotlight’ of the month to highlight good practice from various wards around the hospital to raise awareness of sepsis, this should keep sepsis awareness fresh and in the minds of everyone.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide a sepsis box in Ward 28 containing items needed for rapid diagnosis.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Sepsis Box - the box placed all the items required in one place in order that a diagnosis can be obtained quickly (Ward 28).”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

GP workload and manpower constraints limit practices’ capacity to provide enhanced Summary Care Records beyond required groups.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I’m afraid I don’t have figures for the proportion of Shropshire and Telford patients with severe frailty who have an enhanced SCR. The CCGs may be able to provide these. Clearly, GPs have a responsibility to encourage uptake in this group. In addition, there seems little doubt that there are potential benefits in all patients classed as frail having an enhanced SCR, and that could be extended further. As far as I am aware, there are no plans by the Government to extend the requirement beyond those with severe frailty. GP workload and manpower issues limit the capacity of practices to do more but I will write to practices encouraging GPs to discuss the benefits of allowing an enhanced SCR with all their patients with chronic illness.”

Source location

2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
Page 7 · response
Published 8 July 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/5

Data last updated 7 September 2026