PFD report

Shahzadi Khan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Jan 2024•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Failure of out-of-area and private providers to coordinate effectively with local discharge arrangements
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure safe discharge planning for inpatient mental health admissionsPart of recurring concern: Out-of-area mental health placements failing to provide effective continuity of care and supportPart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  2. Lack of awareness of menopause as a factor in mental health deterioration
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and provide joined-up care for menopause-related deteriorationPart of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and respond to deteriorating mental health in service users
  3. Inadequate support for women experiencing menopause-related mental health deterioration
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to recognise and provide joined-up care for menopause-related deterioration
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Make funding available to support discharge from mental health inpatient settings and reduce out-of-area placements.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2024.
  2. Action

    Provide funding to Mind in Greater Manchester to raise awareness of menopause and its effects on mental health.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2024.
  3. Action

    Publish statutory guidance for discharge from all mental health inpatient settings.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of out-of-area and private providers to coordinate effectively with local discharge arrangements

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard evidence that a shortage of mental health beds nationally meant that the situation that arose here of a placement out of area many miles from home was not unusual and that private beds were being used on a regular basis due to a shortage of NHS beds. The inquest heard that this meant that there were a number of consequences as a result of all of such placements which could as in Ms Khan’s case impact on a patient and increase the risk they presented. In particular: • A family could not easily stay in contact and visiting was almost impossible. This meant a patient felt more isolated and their family could not provide information effectively to the treating clinicians. • Where a non-NHS bed was being used or an out of trust bed was being used notes were not easily shared as different electronic systems were used. • Out of area trusts/private providers would not be familiar with local arrangements to support discharge and had to rely on local trust teams to put plans in place which could as in this case lead to less effective communication ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure safe discharge planning for inpatient mental health admissions; Out-of-area mental health placements failing to provide effective continuity of care and support; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of awareness of menopause as a factor in mental health deterioration

Wider context from the report

“2. There was evidence from her family that her deterioration was in part due to her going through the menopause and that had there been better awareness of this as a factor in mental health deterioration for some women and better support in place, interventions could have taken place at an earlier stage and been more effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and provide joined-up care for menopause-related deterioration; Failure to recognise and respond to deteriorating mental health in service users.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate support for women experiencing menopause-related mental health deterioration

Wider context from the report

“2. There was evidence from her family that her deterioration was in part due to her going through the menopause and that had there been better awareness of this as a factor in mental health deterioration for some women and better support in place, interventions could have taken place at an earlier stage and been more effective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and provide joined-up care for menopause-related deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to share clinical notes across different electronic systems

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard evidence that a shortage of mental health beds nationally meant that the situation that arose here of a placement out of area many miles from home was not unusual and that private beds were being used on a regular basis due to a shortage of NHS beds. The inquest heard that this meant that there were a number of consequences as a result of all of such placements which could as in Ms Khan’s case impact on a patient and increase the risk they presented. In particular: • A family could not easily stay in contact and visiting was almost impossible. This meant a patient felt more isolated and their family could not provide information effectively to the treating clinicians. • Where a non-NHS bed was being used or an out of trust bed was being used notes were not easily shared as different electronic systems were used. • Out of area trusts/private providers would not be familiar with local arrangements to support discharge and had to rely on local trust teams to put plans in place which could as in this case lead to less effective communication ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Electronic patient records failing to make relevant clinical information available and actionable.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to establish a clear discharge plan understood by all involved in care

Wider context from the report

“3. The inquest heard that due to its size the mental health trust covers a number of areas. Each area has its own systems and pathways. Lack of understanding of these pathways by coordinating teams meant that patients were not being moved onto the correct pathway for care. The inquest heard that this was compounded by a lack of awareness by the Trafford HBT of the local pathway for a patient such as Ms Khan and the need for a clear discharge plan to be in place that was understood by all those involved in a patient’s care including her family and mental health care workers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of out-of-area mental health placements limiting family contact

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard evidence that a shortage of mental health beds nationally meant that the situation that arose here of a placement out of area many miles from home was not unusual and that private beds were being used on a regular basis due to a shortage of NHS beds. The inquest heard that this meant that there were a number of consequences as a result of all of such placements which could as in Ms Khan’s case impact on a patient and increase the risk they presented. In particular: • A family could not easily stay in contact and visiting was almost impossible. This meant a patient felt more isolated and their family could not provide information effectively to the treating clinicians. • Where a non-NHS bed was being used or an out of trust bed was being used notes were not easily shared as different electronic systems were used. • Out of area trusts/private providers would not be familiar with local arrangements to support discharge and had to rely on local trust teams to put plans in place which could as in this case lead to less effective communication ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Out-of-area mental health placements failing to provide effective continuity of care and support.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of understanding of local mental health care pathways by coordinating teams

Wider context from the report

“3. The inquest heard that due to its size the mental health trust covers a number of areas. Each area has its own systems and pathways. Lack of understanding of these pathways by coordinating teams meant that patients were not being moved onto the correct pathway for care. The inquest heard that this was compounded by a lack of awareness by the Trafford HBT of the local pathway for a patient such as Ms Khan and the need for a clear discharge plan to be in place that was understood by all those involved in a patient’s care including her family and mental health care workers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unclear roles and pathways for community mental-health services.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Shortage of available mental health beds

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard evidence that a shortage of mental health beds nationally meant that the situation that arose here of a placement out of area many miles from home was not unusual and that private beds were being used on a regular basis due to a shortage of NHS beds. The inquest heard that this meant that there were a number of consequences as a result of all of such placements which could as in Ms Khan’s case impact on a patient and increase the risk they presented. In particular: • A family could not easily stay in contact and visiting was almost impossible. This meant a patient felt more isolated and their family could not provide information effectively to the treating clinicians. • Where a non-NHS bed was being used or an out of trust bed was being used notes were not easily shared as different electronic systems were used. • Out of area trusts/private providers would not be familiar with local arrangements to support discharge and had to rely on local trust teams to put plans in place which could as in this case lead to less effective communication ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient psychiatric inpatient bed capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make funding available to support discharge from mental health inpatient settings and reduce out-of-area placements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To improve the issue of out of area placements, and to support adult social care and discharge, up to £2.8 billion has been made available in 2023/24 and £4.7 billion in 2024/25. This can be used to support discharge from mental health inpatient settings, reducing bed occupancy and OAPs. The Department has been working with NHS England and other”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide funding to Mind in Greater Manchester to raise awareness of menopause and its effects on mental health.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To raise awareness of menopause for healthcare staff including the effect of menopause on mental health, funding has been given to Mind in Greater Manchester (this is a partnership of five local Minds working together to ensure people experience better mental health and to support people with their mental health to live well and feel valued in their communities and at work). The funding will:”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish statutory guidance for discharge from all mental health inpatient settings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To improve the issue of out of area placements, and to support adult social care and discharge, up to £2.8 billion has been made available in 2023/24 and £4.7 billion in 2024/25. This can be used to support discharge from mental health inpatient settings, reducing bed occupancy and OAPs. The Department has been working with NHS England and other”

Source location

Response from Department of Health and Social Care
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026